Perbezaan keluaran
The University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney)
Perbezaan penjejak bersatu untuk public-release-20260523-001. Teks penuh halaman sumber tidak diterbitkan; petikan bukti bahasa asal yang ringkas dipaparkan untuk konteks sitasi.
Perbezaan bersatu
Perubahan penjejak antara-keluaran yang dijana daripada snapshot keluaran awam.
The University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney) public-release-20260523-001 perbezaan
Pelesenan awal yang dikesan.
+72-0
11 # The University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney) AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+other: UNSW advises students given permission to use AI in assessments to always clearly acknowledge that use when planning, designing, or writing their assessment.
5+Evidence (en, 4704ba661be8): If you are given permission and wish to use AI in the process of planning, designing, or writing your assessment, you should always clearly acknowledge this.
46 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
57 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
8+other: UNSW has published six AI principles: AI use must benefit UNSW and society; be equitable and respectful of human rights; be trustworthy, safe, and reliable; be transparent; be identifiable, explainable, and contestable; and be secure and resilient.
9+Evidence (en, 4704ba661be8): The use of AI systems at UNSW benefits UNSW, individuals, society, and the environment. The use of AI systems at UNSW is equitable, and respectful of human rights, diversity, inclusivity, and accessibility. AI systems and their lifecycle at UNSW are trustworthy and are used responsibly, safely, and reliably in accordance with their intended purpose. The use of AI systems is transparent, and people understand when the AI system is engaging with or impacting them, the environment, and/or society. AI systems and their lifecycle used at UNSW are identifiable, explainable, interpretable, accountable, and contestable. AI systems and their lifecycle used at UNSW are secure and resilient.
610 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
711 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
12+other: UNSW's first key principle for AI in assessment requires staff to be honest and transparent about the use of any AI tool where it would reasonably be expected that use of the tool would be disclosed.
13+Evidence (en, 33409d5e6c59): Be honest and transparent about the use of any AI tool where it would reasonably be expected that use of the tool would be disclosed.
814 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
915 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
16+other: UNSW's second key principle for AI in assessment requires that any AI-based output must be reviewed with all due diligence before being released or relied upon, particularly to avoid bias and factual errors.
17+Evidence (en, 33409d5e6c59): Ensure that any AI-based output is reviewed with all due diligence before being released or relied upon. This is particularly important to ensure that you avoid bias and factual errors in the output.
1018 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1119 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
20+other: UNSW defines six high-level categories for permitted AI use in assessments: No Assistance, Simple Editing Assistance, Planning/Design Assistance, Assistance with Attribution, Generative AI Software-based Assessments, and Not Applicable.
21+Evidence (en, 33409d5e6c59): Based on extensive feedback across UNSW, six high-level categories have been defined for assessments that include some degree of AI use, as well as an additional category for assessments where AI is unlikely to be used.
1222 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1323 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
24+other: UNSW requires that when ChatGPT or other forms of GenAI are accepted as part of an assessment, academics must ensure the tools are easily accessible for all students with no physical, geographical, or financial restrictions.
25+Evidence (en, 33409d5e6c59): When ChatGPT or other forms of GenAI are accepted as part of an assessment, academics must ensure that they are easily accessible for everyone. There must be no physical, geographical or financial restrictions on students' use of the tool.
1426 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1527 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
28+other: UNSW states that as a rule, markers must not use AI platforms for marking or grading student work.
29+Evidence (en, 33409d5e6c59): As a rule, markers must not use AI platforms for marking or grading.
1630 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1731 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
32+other: UNSW only authorises the use of Turnitin's AI Writing Detection Tool for detecting improper AI use in student work; UNSW IT has not approved other detection tools due to privacy and accuracy concerns.
33+Evidence (en, 33409d5e6c59): UNSW only authorises the use of Turnitin's AI Writing Detection Tool for detecting improper AI use. Students' work should not be uploaded to any other platform because: Only Turnitin has been approved by UNSW Cyber Security as protecting student privacy. The accuracy of other detection tools is extremely low.
1834 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1935 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
36+other: UNSW's investigation process for suspected improper AI use involves five steps: initial sense-check, checking signs of AI writing, discussing with the student, contacting the School Student Integrity Adviser (SSIA), and referral to the Conduct & Integrity Office.
37+Evidence (en, 33409d5e6c59): Step 1: Initial checks... Step 2: Check the signs... Step 3: Discuss with the student... Step 4: Contact your SSIA for further assistance... Step 5: Contact the Conduct & Integrity Office
2038 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
2139 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
40+other: Where unauthorised AI use in an assessment is admitted or determined at UNSW, a finding of serious student misconduct is made as a breach of Principle 3 of the Student Code of Conduct, with penalties consistent with Serious Student Misconduct and Serious Plagiarism (typically 00FL for the course, suspension, or exclusion).
41+Evidence (en, 33409d5e6c59): Where the unauthorised use of AI in an assessment is admitted or determined, a finding of serious student misconduct is made – as a breach of Principle 3 of the Student Code of Conduct which states that students must act with integrity, honesty and trust. The penalties for a finding of this sort would be consistent with the penalties for Serious Student Misconduct and Serious Plagiarism – they would normally sit at 00FL for the course, suspension or exclusion depending on the matter.
2242 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
2343 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
44+other: UNSW has an AI leadership group that serves as a clearinghouse for critical issues and strategic initiatives and plays a pivotal role in guiding enterprise decisions on AI.
45+Evidence (en, 57b772b4148f): UNSW has an AI leadership group that serves as an overall clearinghouse for addressing critical issues and strategic initiatives. It plays a pivotal role in guiding enterprise decisions.
2446 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
2547 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
48+other: UNSW uses a Levels of AI Assistance framework with six categories for assessments: No Assistance, Simple Editing Assistance, Planning or Design Assistance, Assistance with Attribution, Generative AI Software-based Assessments, and Not Applicable.
49+Evidence (en, 4704ba661be8): The Levels of AI Assistance framework is designed to help convenors communicate to students how much, or how little AI can be used in the process of planning, creating and producing an assignment.
2650 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
2751 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
52+other: UNSW has developed an AI capability framework for teaching staff covering common knowledge (what is AI, prompts, evaluating outputs), AI governance, ethical and responsible use, assessment and learning, and technology (Microsoft Copilot, Adobe Firefly, Scite.ai).
53+Evidence (en, 57b772b4148f): To equip our staff to meet the university's evolving AI needs, UNSW has developed a framework that aims to guide staff with the knowledge and skills to navigate in an AI-driven academic environment.
2854 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
2955 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
56+other: UNSW has adopted Microsoft Copilot, Adobe Firefly, and Scite.ai as its approved AI tools for staff use.
57+Evidence (en, 57b772b4148f): Identification and practical application of adopted AI tools at UNSW: Microsoft Copilot, Adobe Firefly, Scite.ai
3058 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
3159 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
60+other: UNSW requires that students must follow assessment instructions regarding AI use, that what students present must be their own work, and that students must acknowledge all sources including AI as an external source using proper referencing.
61+Evidence (en, 2fb44fd83942): Students must follow the assessment instructions... What students present must be their own work... Students must acknowledge sources. Students should attribute all sources using proper referencing, unless the assessment nature or instructions exempt them from doing so. External sources that must be referenced include both the work of others and sources from digital or physical objects, with AI classified as an external source.
3262 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
3363 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
64+other: UNSW states that students are entitled to use generative AI to the extent specified by course instructions or university rules, and that assessment instructions should set out acceptable use of AI tools.
65+Evidence (en, 2fb44fd83942): Students are entitled to use generative AI to the extent specified by the course instructions or university rules. All assessment instructions should set out the acceptable use of AI tools.
3466 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
3567 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
68+other: UNSW College students may only use AI for an assessment if the instructions in the Course Outline permit its use.
69+Evidence (en, 480942a7fc76): You may use AI for an assessment if the instructions in your Course Outline permit its use.
3670 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
3771 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
72+other: UNSW College recommends Microsoft Copilot as the only generative AI platform for staff and students, as it provides commercial data protection and is the only platform recommended where generative AI use is allowed in coursework and assessment.
73+Evidence (en, 480942a7fc76): UNSW College recommend that students use the College Microsoft Copilot AI Tool... Where the use of generative AI is allowed as part of coursework and/or assessment, this is the only generative AI platform recommended for UNSW College staff and students.
3874 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
3975 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
76+other: UNSW activated Microsoft Copilot with Commercial Data Protection for all staff and students with a zID in May 2024, providing a secure platform where sensitive information is stored and accessed only by authorised staff.
77+Evidence (en, 480942a7fc76): In May 2024, UNSW activated Microsoft Copilot with Commercial Data Protection for all staff and students with a zID. The protected version provides staff and students with a secure platform to ensure that sensitive information is securely stored and accessed only by authorised staff.
4078 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
4179 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
80+other: UNSW College requires that if AI is permitted for an assessment, students must acknowledge and reference the AI tool using the referencing style for their course and program (e.g., APA Style Referencing 7th edition).
81+Evidence (en, 480942a7fc76): If you are permitted to use AI for part or all of your assessment, you must: Acknowledge and reference the AI tool using the referencing style for your course and program. For example, APA Style Referencing 7th edition.
4282 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
4383 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
84+other: UNSW College permits AI tools for refining writing only when an AI assessment icon indicates it is allowed, for purposes including refining spelling and grammar, revising style and tone, improving clarity, improving vocabulary, checking similarity, assisting proofreading, and self-marking against a rubric.
85+Evidence (en, 480942a7fc76): If an AI assessment icon says you can refine your writing with AI tools or as a copyediting tool, you may be permitted to use these tools for the following: Refine spelling and grammar. Revise style and tone. Improve clarity and coherence of writing. Improve vocabulary. Check your document for similarity to online sources. Assist in proofreading. Self-mark an assessment against a marking rubric.
4486 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
4587 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
88+other: UNSW's AI Leadership Group endorsed and published principles on the Ethical and Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence at UNSW in 2024, designed to regulate AI use, support a positive approach, and promote world-leading AI research.
89+Evidence (en, d4f62e3d035e): UNSW's AI Leadership Group has recently endorsed and published principles on the Ethical and Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence at UNSW. These are to be used to steer and support the use of AI and generative AI appropriately at the University. UNSW aims to provide a safe and digitally secure environment relating to the use of generative AI, for both students and staff. The principles are designed to regulate the use of AI (including generative AI), support a positive approach to and promote world-leading AI research.
4690 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
4791 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
92+other: Under UNSW's 'No Assistance' level, students are not permitted to use any generative AI tools, software, or service to search for or generate information or answers.
93+Evidence (en, 4704ba661be8): This assessment is designed for you to complete without the use of any generative AI. You are not permitted to use any generative AI tools, software or service to search for or generate information or answers.
4894 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
4995 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
96+other: At UNSW, the unauthorised or unacknowledged use of AI in assessments is classified as cheating and considered student misconduct under the Code of Conduct and Values.
97+Evidence (en, 4704ba661be8): The unauthorised or unacknowledged use of AI in assessments is a form of cheating and is considered to be student misconduct at UNSW under the current Code of Conduct and Values.
5098 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
5199 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
100+other: UNSW penalties for unauthorised AI use in assessments may include a fail grade, a mark of zero for the course, suspension, or permanent exclusion.
101+Evidence (en, 4704ba661be8): If you have been found to use AI in a manner that does not meet the course instructions, penalties may occur which would include a fail, a mark of zero for the course, suspension or permanent exclusion.
52102 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
53103 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
104+other: UNSW provides academics with access to Turnitin's AI detection tool for assessments submitted through Moodle Turnitin Assignment or Inspera, but notes this is not always conclusive evidence of improper AI use.
105+Evidence (en, 4704ba661be8): All academics marking assessments submitted through either Moodle Turnitin Assignment or Inspera now have access to Turnitin's new AI detection tool. This provides academics with an estimated percentage of text that has similarities to AI-generated or AI-paraphrased text. This is not always conclusive evidence that a student has inappropriately used generative AI, however, this will be a flag for a marker to further review a student's submission.
54106 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
55107 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
108+other: UNSW classifies Grammarly, Quillbot, and translation tools such as Google Translate, DeepL, and Baidu Translate as forms of generative AI.
109+Evidence (en, 4704ba661be8): It's important that students are aware of what tools use generative AI and may be inappropriate in an assessment. For example, Grammarly, Quillbot and translation tools such as Google Translate, DeepL and Baidu Translate are forms of generative AI.
56110 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
57111 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
112+other: UNSW advises students not to include any personal or sensitive information in AI prompts, including addresses, names, emails, zID, or intellectual property, and recommends using Microsoft Copilot with a UNSW account for data privacy.
113+Evidence (en, 4704ba661be8): Protect personal information. Do not include any personal or sensitive information in prompts, your own or other people's (i.e. addresses, name, emails, zID or intellectual property). For data privacy and protection, use Microsoft Copilot using your UNSW account
58114 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
59115 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
116+other: UNSW warns students that generative AI tools may produce invalid or unreliable information ('fabrications' or 'hallucinations') and advises them to verify the accuracy of AI outputs.
117+Evidence (en, 4704ba661be8): Verify accuracy of AI outputs. GenAI tools could produce invalid or unreliable information ('fabrications' or 'hallucinations'). Book an appointment with the Academic Skills team if you need guidance.
60118 ## Source attribution added
61119 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
120+Source https://my.unswcollege.edu.au/student-support/student-ai-guidelines snapshot 480942a7fc762dbe43a517aeae7df90d5d042ca01cb56f314c0cc36bd115dc2a
121+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T04:55:45Z
62122 ## Source attribution added
63123 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
124+Source https://www.education.unsw.edu.au/news-events/news/genai-update-june-2023 snapshot 1096262dab754a5ea23a65f1479127c13267baf1d621c2fb21bc82125ac62b72
125+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T04:55:45Z
64126 ## Source attribution added
65127 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
128+Source https://www.inside.unsw.edu.au/innovation-and-engagement/are-you-aware-unsws-new-ai-principles snapshot d4f62e3d035e16bcf2620ee3ad7f1dfc3694f5b41f4f68bb73f6ccd53902a9bf
129+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T04:55:45Z
66130 ## Source attribution added
67131 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
132+Source https://www.teaching.unsw.edu.au/ai/ai-assessment-guidance snapshot 33409d5e6c59361d2c259aa714cb2e0ca305a12d15d50af6eb77229a05e06e61
133+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T04:55:45Z
68134 ## Source attribution added
69135 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
136+Source https://www.teaching.unsw.edu.au/ai/guidance-to-student snapshot 2fb44fd83942ce5729dfc30b56ed295ca2883a13d06441b427ca9b6acfc841ca
137+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T04:55:45Z
70138 ## Source attribution added
71139 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
140+Source https://www.teaching.unsw.edu.au/ai/guidelines snapshot 57b772b4148fa35277a60538cbc8175d07caf290a51ab057206f4b17b5cf5639
141+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T04:55:45Z
72142 ## Source attribution added
73143 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
144+Source https://www.unsw.edu.au/student/managing-your-studies/academic-skills-support/toolkit/ai snapshot 4704ba661be84136e6a699c4c456d300349b5ac06faf2b965655c75a4aebc44a
145+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T04:55:45Z
Cara membaca perbezaan ini
Metadata pelepasan penjejak, bukan bukti langsung masa penerbitan universiti.
Tuntutan diekstrak baharu adalah penambahan penjejak dan tidak semestinya diterbitkan baru-baru ini oleh universiti. Perubahan snapshot sumber bermaksud URL yang sama menghasilkan hesh berbeza; ia mungkin teks dasar, susun atur, navigasi, atau metadata.
Sempadan
Hanya metadata penjejak
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.