Change log
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Current public record freshness and review state.
Peking University currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 1 official source attribution. Latest tracked changed date: May 6, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
5 claim records
Peking University's AI Scientific Integrity Platform defines AI use boundaries across seven research stages: topic selection, literature search and management, research design and implementation, paper writing, paper submission, paper review, and grant application and review.
Peking University's AI use guidelines apply to faculty, students, researchers, and administrators who use generative AI or other AI-assisted tools in teaching, research, and management activities.
Peking University classifies AI use in research into three tiers: open use (low risk, broadly applicable), limited use (moderate risk, requires verification and constraints), and prohibited use (high risk or violation, forbidden).
Peking University distinguishes two levels of AI involvement in research: instrumental assistance (using AI as a tool to handle routine or repetitive tasks) and replacement completion (using AI to independently complete tasks involving core intellectual contribution and creative labor).
Peking University's AI Scientific Integrity Platform synthesizes AI use policies from 18 domestic and international sources, including Chinese government agencies (MOST, NSFC), Chinese universities (Fudan, Nanjing, Sichuan), international bodies (EU Commission, NIH), and universities (Harvard, Yale, Cambridge, UCL, Oxford, MIT).
1 source attribution
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 6, 2026, 4:55 AM