Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Gothenburg in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.
At present, all staff and students have access to the chat service Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat. In addition, employees have access to ChatGPT Edu. It is also possible to request access to the extended version of Copilot, Microsoft 365 Copilot; however, this service comes with a cost that is charged to the department or equivalent, and therefore an order requires approval from a manager.
University of Gothenburg PIL guidance says all staff and students have access to Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat, employees have access to ChatGPT Edu, and Microsoft 365 Copilot can be requested with manager approval because its cost is charged to the department or equivalent.
claim-gothenburg-copilot-chat-chatgpt-edu-access
Use of generative AI at the University of Gothenburg
Det är viktigt att notera att universitetet inte rekommenderar att kontrollera ditt arbete med en AI-detektionsverktyg eftersom befintliga verktyg är opålitliga.
University of Gothenburg student guidance says the university does not recommend checking student work with an AI-detection tool because existing tools are unreliable.
claim-gothenburg-ai-detection-not-recommended
Så kan generativ AI påverka lärande och examinationer
Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Gothenburg in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.
With regard to the use of generative AI tools, AI-generated content may not be presented as one’s own work, as this is considered misleading. In the task instructions, the examiner should specify the limits for the permitted use of generative AI tools.
The University of Gothenburg study-rules PDF states that, for take-home examinations, written tasks, or equivalent, AI-generated content may not be presented as one’s own work and examiners should specify the limits for permitted use of generative AI tools.
claim-gothenburg-ai-generated-not-own-work
Rules 95, take-home examinations, written tasks or equivalent
Göteborgs universitet förbjuder inte användning av generativ AI i utbildning. Istället är det upp till lärare och examinatorer att själva avgöra om, när och hur generativ AI kan användas i kursarbete och examinationer.
University of Gothenburg student guidance says the university does not prohibit generative AI in education; teachers and examiners decide whether, when, and how it may be used in coursework and examinations.
claim-gothenburg-no-university-wide-ban
Universitetets ställningstagande kring generativ AI
Riktlinjer för generativ AI varierar mellan kurser, program, avdelningar och fakulteter. Det är lärare och examinatorer som ansvarar för att kommunicera riktlinjer kring generativ AI till studenter.
University of Gothenburg student guidance says generative-AI guidelines vary between courses, programmes, departments, and faculties, and that teachers and examiners are responsible for communicating those guidelines to students.
claim-gothenburg-guidelines-vary-communication
Universitetets ställningstagande kring generativ AI
Generativ AI kan skapa nytt innehåll. Universitetet förbjuder inte användning av generativ AI, men det räknas som fusk om du använder det för att: Genomföra en examinationsuppgift som du som student förväntas göra själv; Presenterar AI-genererad text eller annat material som om det vore ditt eget arbete; Även andra sätt att använda generativ AI kan vara otillåtna i din kurs eller i ditt program.
University of Gothenburg student guidance on cheating says generative AI use counts as cheating when it is used to complete an examination task the student is expected to do independently, to present AI-generated material as the student’s own work, or in other ways prohibited in the course or programme.
Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Gothenburg in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.
Det är viktigt att notera att universitetet inte rekommenderar att kontrollera ditt arbete med en AI-detektionsverktyg eftersom befintliga verktyg är opålitliga.
University of Gothenburg student guidance says the university does not recommend checking student work with an AI-detection tool because existing tools are unreliable.
claim-gothenburg-ai-detection-not-recommended
Så kan generativ AI påverka lärande och examinationer
There is also some complexity regarding the use of services not offered through the university since they have not been scrutinized from, for example, legal perspectives, or in terms of security. Therefore, users of these services are advised to exercise caution. It is, for instance, very important not to share any personal data or sensitive information. This also applies to Microsoft Bing Chat/Copilot at present, even though it is offered through the university.
University of Gothenburg PIL guidance advises caution with services not offered through the university because they have not been reviewed for legal or security issues, and says users should not share personal data or sensitive information; the page says this also applied to Microsoft Bing Chat/Copilot at the time of publication.
Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Gothenburg in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.
Göteborgs universitet förbjuder inte användning av generativ AI i utbildning. Istället är det upp till lärare och examinatorer att själva avgöra om, när och hur generativ AI kan användas i kursarbete och examinationer.
University of Gothenburg student guidance says the university does not prohibit generative AI in education; teachers and examiners decide whether, when, and how it may be used in coursework and examinations.
claim-gothenburg-no-university-wide-ban
Universitetets ställningstagande kring generativ AI
At present, all staff and students have access to the chat service Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat. In addition, employees have access to ChatGPT Edu. It is also possible to request access to the extended version of Copilot, Microsoft 365 Copilot; however, this service comes with a cost that is charged to the department or equivalent, and therefore an order requires approval from a manager.
University of Gothenburg PIL guidance says all staff and students have access to Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat, employees have access to ChatGPT Edu, and Microsoft 365 Copilot can be requested with manager approval because its cost is charged to the department or equivalent.
claim-gothenburg-copilot-chat-chatgpt-edu-access
Use of generative AI at the University of Gothenburg
När det gäller examinationer ser Göteborgs universitet generativ AI som ett verktyg och universitetets regler för studier på grundnivå och avancerad nivå tillämpas.
A University of Gothenburg PIL page says that, for examinations, the university regards generative AI as a tool and applies the university’s rules for first- and second-cycle studies.
There is also some complexity regarding the use of services not offered through the university since they have not been scrutinized from, for example, legal perspectives, or in terms of security. Therefore, users of these services are advised to exercise caution. It is, for instance, very important not to share any personal data or sensitive information. This also applies to Microsoft Bing Chat/Copilot at present, even though it is offered through the university.
University of Gothenburg PIL guidance advises caution with services not offered through the university because they have not been reviewed for legal or security issues, and says users should not share personal data or sensitive information; the page says this also applied to Microsoft Bing Chat/Copilot at the time of publication.
With regard to the use of generative AI tools, AI-generated content may not be presented as one’s own work, as this is considered misleading. In the task instructions, the examiner should specify the limits for the permitted use of generative AI tools.
The University of Gothenburg study-rules PDF states that, for take-home examinations, written tasks, or equivalent, AI-generated content may not be presented as one’s own work and examiners should specify the limits for permitted use of generative AI tools.
claim-gothenburg-ai-generated-not-own-work
Rules 95, take-home examinations, written tasks or equivalent
Generativ AI kan skapa nytt innehåll. Universitetet förbjuder inte användning av generativ AI, men det räknas som fusk om du använder det för att: Genomföra en examinationsuppgift som du som student förväntas göra själv; Presenterar AI-genererad text eller annat material som om det vore ditt eget arbete; Även andra sätt att använda generativ AI kan vara otillåtna i din kurs eller i ditt program.
University of Gothenburg student guidance on cheating says generative AI use counts as cheating when it is used to complete an examination task the student is expected to do independently, to present AI-generated material as the student’s own work, or in other ways prohibited in the course or programme.
Det är viktigt att notera att universitetet inte rekommenderar att kontrollera ditt arbete med en AI-detektionsverktyg eftersom befintliga verktyg är opålitliga.
University of Gothenburg student guidance says the university does not recommend checking student work with an AI-detection tool because existing tools are unreliable.
claim-gothenburg-ai-detection-not-recommended
Så kan generativ AI påverka lärande och examinationer
Riktlinjer för generativ AI varierar mellan kurser, program, avdelningar och fakulteter. Det är lärare och examinatorer som ansvarar för att kommunicera riktlinjer kring generativ AI till studenter.
University of Gothenburg student guidance says generative-AI guidelines vary between courses, programmes, departments, and faculties, and that teachers and examiners are responsible for communicating those guidelines to students.
claim-gothenburg-guidelines-vary-communication
Universitetets ställningstagande kring generativ AI
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
Security and procurementUniversity of Gothenburg
Not mentioned in reviewed sources
Status & scope
Scope stated in the cited claims
Original official evidence
No reviewed evidence is included for this topic. This does not establish that no rule exists.
Record updatesLast 90 days
Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.
Update records are not available for this page yet.
Reviewed record
Reviewed claims
9 reviewed claims
Academic Integrity 3 reviewed claims
Academic Integrity
The University of Gothenburg study-rules PDF states that, for take-home examinations, written tasks, or equivalent, AI-generated content may not be presented as one’s own work and examiners should specify the limits for permitted use of generative AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%
Normalized value: AI-generated content may not be presented as own work; examiner should specify permitted-use limits
Last checked
May 15, 2026
Last changed
May 15, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
With regard to the use of generative AI tools, AI-generated content may not be presented as one’s own work, as this is considered misleading. In the task instructions, the examiner should specify the limits for the permitted use of generative AI tools.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
20d3a923…
Retrieved
May 15, 2026
Evidence locator
Rules 95, take-home examinations, written tasks or equivalent
Academic Integrity
University of Gothenburg student guidance on cheating says generative AI use counts as cheating when it is used to complete an examination task the student is expected to do independently, to present AI-generated material as the student’s own work, or in other ways prohibited in the course or programme.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%
Normalized value: unauthorized generative AI use can count as cheating
Last checked
May 15, 2026
Last changed
May 15, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
Generativ AI kan skapa nytt innehåll. Universitetet förbjuder inte användning av generativ AI, men det räknas som fusk om du använder det för att: Genomföra en examinationsuppgift som du som student förväntas göra själv; Presenterar AI-genererad text eller annat material som om det vore ditt eget arbete; Även andra sätt att använda generativ AI kan vara otillåtna i din kurs eller i ditt program.
Source language
sv
Snapshot hash
2e64bd58…
Retrieved
May 15, 2026
Evidence locator
Otillåten användning av generativ AI
Academic Integrity
University of Gothenburg student guidance says the university does not recommend checking student work with an AI-detection tool because existing tools are unreliable.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%
Normalized value: AI-detection tools not recommended because existing tools are unreliable
Last checked
May 15, 2026
Last changed
May 15, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
Det är viktigt att notera att universitetet inte rekommenderar att kontrollera ditt arbete med en AI-detektionsverktyg eftersom befintliga verktyg är opålitliga.
Source language
sv
Snapshot hash
d8bc74ea…
Retrieved
May 15, 2026
Evidence locator
Så kan generativ AI påverka lärande och examinationer
Teaching 1 reviewed claim
Teaching
University of Gothenburg student guidance says generative-AI guidelines vary between courses, programmes, departments, and faculties, and that teachers and examiners are responsible for communicating those guidelines to students.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%
Normalized value: guidelines vary by course/programme/department/faculty; teachers/examiners communicate them
Last checked
May 15, 2026
Last changed
May 15, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
Riktlinjer för generativ AI varierar mellan kurser, program, avdelningar och fakulteter. Det är lärare och examinatorer som ansvarar för att kommunicera riktlinjer kring generativ AI till studenter.
Source language
sv
Snapshot hash
d8bc74ea…
Retrieved
May 15, 2026
Evidence locator
Universitetets ställningstagande kring generativ AI
Privacy 1 reviewed claim
Privacy
University of Gothenburg PIL guidance advises caution with services not offered through the university because they have not been reviewed for legal or security issues, and says users should not share personal data or sensitive information; the page says this also applied to Microsoft Bing Chat/Copilot at the time of publication.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%
Normalized value: do not share personal data or sensitive information with unreviewed services; caution also stated for Microsoft Bing Chat/Copilot
Last checked
May 15, 2026
Last changed
May 15, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
There is also some complexity regarding the use of services not offered through the university since they have not been scrutinized from, for example, legal perspectives, or in terms of security. Therefore, users of these services are advised to exercise caution. It is, for instance, very important not to share any personal data or sensitive information. This also applies to Microsoft Bing Chat/Copilot at present, even though it is offered through the university.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
63ab5ee9…
Retrieved
May 15, 2026
Evidence locator
Use of generative AI at the University of Gothenburg
AI tool use 4 reviewed claims
Ai Tool Treatment
Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Gothenburg in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%
Normalized value: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot","description":"University of Gothenburg gives all employees access to a login-protected Microsoft Copilot version.","howToObtain":"Use the employee user account.","costToUser":"Not specified by the cited source.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"not_specified"}
Last checked
Jul 16, 2026
Last changed
Jul 16, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
All employees have access to a login-protected version of the AI tool Microsoft Copilot via their user account.
Localized display only
All employees have access to a login-protected version of the AI tool Microsoft Copilot via their user account.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
867a4a31…
Retrieved
Jul 16, 2026
Ai Tool Treatment
University of Gothenburg student guidance says the university does not prohibit generative AI in education; teachers and examiners decide whether, when, and how it may be used in coursework and examinations.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%
Normalized value: no university-wide prohibition; course/examiner-level decisions
Last checked
May 15, 2026
Last changed
May 15, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
Göteborgs universitet förbjuder inte användning av generativ AI i utbildning. Istället är det upp till lärare och examinatorer att själva avgöra om, när och hur generativ AI kan användas i kursarbete och examinationer.
Source language
sv
Snapshot hash
d8bc74ea…
Retrieved
May 15, 2026
Evidence locator
Universitetets ställningstagande kring generativ AI
Ai Tool Treatment
University of Gothenburg PIL guidance says all staff and students have access to Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat, employees have access to ChatGPT Edu, and Microsoft 365 Copilot can be requested with manager approval because its cost is charged to the department or equivalent.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%
Normalized value: Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat for all staff/students; ChatGPT Edu for employees; extended Copilot by approved paid request
Last checked
May 15, 2026
Last changed
May 15, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
At present, all staff and students have access to the chat service Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat. In addition, employees have access to ChatGPT Edu. It is also possible to request access to the extended version of Copilot, Microsoft 365 Copilot; however, this service comes with a cost that is charged to the department or equivalent, and therefore an order requires approval from a manager.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
63ab5ee9…
Retrieved
May 15, 2026
Evidence locator
Use of generative AI at the University of Gothenburg
Ai Tool Treatment
A University of Gothenburg PIL page says that, for examinations, the university regards generative AI as a tool and applies the university’s rules for first- and second-cycle studies.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%
Normalized value: generative AI treated as a tool in examinations; first- and second-cycle study rules apply
Last checked
May 15, 2026
Last changed
May 15, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
När det gäller examinationer ser Göteborgs universitet generativ AI som ett verktyg och universitetets regler för studier på grundnivå och avancerad nivå tillämpas.
Source language
sv
Snapshot hash
31c02c58…
Retrieved
May 15, 2026
Evidence locator
Inverkan på examination och bedömning
Source record
Official sources
6 sources
6 official URLs; 6 source attributions and their captured versions retained.
AI-generated material in higher education
www.pil.gu.se
University official source
pil.gu.se
Hash and captured version
AI-generated material in higher education · 2026-05-15T12:31:26Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Gothenburg AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-gothenburg
Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.
Saved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.
Questions students ask
Questions students ask
Can I use AI for my coursework?
University of Gothenburg has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
