AUS policy says students are forbidden from using generative AI tools to produce assessment work unless the course instructor explicitly permits that use.
claim-aus-gai-assessment-permission
Policy Statement, Authorization of usage of GAI tools
Course instructors must: Include the following details in the course syllabus: Name(s) of the generative AI tool(s) that can be used; Brief rationale for using the tool(s); Instructions on which assignments and class activities the tool(s) can be used for.
AUS policy says instructors must specify permitted generative AI tools, rationale, allowed assignments or activities, and an academic integrity statement in the course syllabus when AI tools are used.
claim-aus-instructors-syllabus-ai-details
Policy Statement, Course Instructor and Student Responsibilities
Students must: Acknowledge, in line with course policy, any usage of the tool(s) in all material submitted for course credit including the name and version number of the tool(s).
Students must: Take full responsibility for the accuracy of AI generated output in any work they produce. Ensure that any use of the tool(s) is compliant with the course syllabus, any updates posted on the course ilearn page, the most recent versions of the AUS academic integrity policy, and the AUS IT acceptable use policy.
AUS policy says students are responsible for the accuracy of AI-generated output in their work and must ensure use complies with syllabus, iLearn updates, academic integrity policy, and IT acceptable use policy.
The institution does not prohibit the use of GAI detection software at any stage of the academic integrity adjudication process but does recognize that the output of such tools cannot provide a definitive judgement on whether an academic integrity violation has taken place.
AUS policy says the institution does not prohibit generative AI detection software in academic integrity adjudication but recognizes detection output cannot provide a definitive judgment.
AUS policy says students are forbidden from using generative AI tools to produce assessment work unless the course instructor explicitly permits that use.
claim-aus-gai-assessment-permission
Policy Statement, Authorization of usage of GAI tools
Course instructors must: Include the following details in the course syllabus: Name(s) of the generative AI tool(s) that can be used; Brief rationale for using the tool(s); Instructions on which assignments and class activities the tool(s) can be used for.
AUS policy says instructors must specify permitted generative AI tools, rationale, allowed assignments or activities, and an academic integrity statement in the course syllabus when AI tools are used.
claim-aus-instructors-syllabus-ai-details
Policy Statement, Course Instructor and Student Responsibilities
Students must: Acknowledge, in line with course policy, any usage of the tool(s) in all material submitted for course credit including the name and version number of the tool(s).
Students must: Take full responsibility for the accuracy of AI generated output in any work they produce. Ensure that any use of the tool(s) is compliant with the course syllabus, any updates posted on the course ilearn page, the most recent versions of the AUS academic integrity policy, and the AUS IT acceptable use policy.
AUS policy says students are responsible for the accuracy of AI-generated output in their work and must ensure use complies with syllabus, iLearn updates, academic integrity policy, and IT acceptable use policy.
The institution does not prohibit the use of GAI detection software at any stage of the academic integrity adjudication process but does recognize that the output of such tools cannot provide a definitive judgement on whether an academic integrity violation has taken place.
AUS policy says the institution does not prohibit generative AI detection software in academic integrity adjudication but recognizes detection output cannot provide a definitive judgment.
Students must: Acknowledge, in line with course policy, any usage of the tool(s) in all material submitted for course credit including the name and version number of the tool(s).
Students must: Take full responsibility for the accuracy of AI generated output in any work they produce. Ensure that any use of the tool(s) is compliant with the course syllabus, any updates posted on the course ilearn page, the most recent versions of the AUS academic integrity policy, and the AUS IT acceptable use policy.
AUS policy says students are responsible for the accuracy of AI-generated output in their work and must ensure use complies with syllabus, iLearn updates, academic integrity policy, and IT acceptable use policy.
AUS policy applies to undergraduate and graduate teaching and learning environments and says faculty research use of generative AI tools is not covered by this policy.
AUS policy says students are forbidden from using generative AI tools to produce assessment work unless the course instructor explicitly permits that use.
claim-aus-gai-assessment-permission
Policy Statement, Authorization of usage of GAI tools
Course instructors must: Include the following details in the course syllabus: Name(s) of the generative AI tool(s) that can be used; Brief rationale for using the tool(s); Instructions on which assignments and class activities the tool(s) can be used for.
AUS policy says instructors must specify permitted generative AI tools, rationale, allowed assignments or activities, and an academic integrity statement in the course syllabus when AI tools are used.
claim-aus-instructors-syllabus-ai-details
Policy Statement, Course Instructor and Student Responsibilities
Students must: Acknowledge, in line with course policy, any usage of the tool(s) in all material submitted for course credit including the name and version number of the tool(s).
Students must: Take full responsibility for the accuracy of AI generated output in any work they produce. Ensure that any use of the tool(s) is compliant with the course syllabus, any updates posted on the course ilearn page, the most recent versions of the AUS academic integrity policy, and the AUS IT acceptable use policy.
AUS policy says students are responsible for the accuracy of AI-generated output in their work and must ensure use complies with syllabus, iLearn updates, academic integrity policy, and IT acceptable use policy.
The institution does not prohibit the use of GAI detection software at any stage of the academic integrity adjudication process but does recognize that the output of such tools cannot provide a definitive judgement on whether an academic integrity violation has taken place.
AUS policy says the institution does not prohibit generative AI detection software in academic integrity adjudication but recognizes detection output cannot provide a definitive judgment.
AUS policy says students are forbidden from using generative AI tools to produce assessment work unless the course instructor explicitly permits that use.
claim-aus-gai-assessment-permission
Policy Statement, Authorization of usage of GAI tools
Course instructors must: Include the following details in the course syllabus: Name(s) of the generative AI tool(s) that can be used; Brief rationale for using the tool(s); Instructions on which assignments and class activities the tool(s) can be used for.
AUS policy says instructors must specify permitted generative AI tools, rationale, allowed assignments or activities, and an academic integrity statement in the course syllabus when AI tools are used.
claim-aus-instructors-syllabus-ai-details
Policy Statement, Course Instructor and Student Responsibilities
Students must: Take full responsibility for the accuracy of AI generated output in any work they produce. Ensure that any use of the tool(s) is compliant with the course syllabus, any updates posted on the course ilearn page, the most recent versions of the AUS academic integrity policy, and the AUS IT acceptable use policy.
AUS policy says students are responsible for the accuracy of AI-generated output in their work and must ensure use complies with syllabus, iLearn updates, academic integrity policy, and IT acceptable use policy.
AUS policy applies to undergraduate and graduate teaching and learning environments and says faculty research use of generative AI tools is not covered by this policy.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
Seguridad y adquisiciónAmerican University of Sharjah
No se menciona en las fuentes revisadas
Estado y alcance
Scope stated in the cited claims
Evidencia oficial original
No hay evidencia revisada para este tema. Esto no demuestra que no exista una norma.
Actualizaciones del registroÚltimos 90 días
Actualizaciones de los datos revisados de este sitio; no confirman que la universidad haya cambiado su política.
Las actualizaciones aún no están disponibles para esta página.
Registro revisado
Afirmaciones revisadas
Afirmaciones revisadas: 6
Integridad académica Afirmaciones revisadas: 3
Integridad académica
AUS policy says students are forbidden from using generative AI tools to produce assessment work unless the course instructor explicitly permits that use.
Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza96%
Valor normalizado: gai_assessment_use_requires_instructor_permission
Última verificación
16 may 2026
Último cambio
16 may 2026
Evidencia original
Evidencia 1
Students are forbidden from using GAI tools to produce any work for assessment unless that use is explicitly permitted by the course instructor.
Idioma de la fuente
English (en)
Hash de instantánea
b4ff98fd…
Recuperado
16 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
Policy Statement, Authorization of usage of GAI tools
Integridad académica
AUS policy says students must acknowledge generative AI tool use in submitted course-credit material, including the tool name and version number.
Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza95%
Valor normalizado: students_must_acknowledge_gai_tool_use
Última verificación
16 may 2026
Último cambio
16 may 2026
Evidencia original
Evidencia 1
Students must: Acknowledge, in line with course policy, any usage of the tool(s) in all material submitted for course credit including the name and version number of the tool(s).
Idioma de la fuente
English (en)
Hash de instantánea
b4ff98fd…
Recuperado
16 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
Policy Statement, Student Responsibilities
Integridad académica
AUS policy says the institution does not prohibit generative AI detection software in academic integrity adjudication but recognizes detection output cannot provide a definitive judgment.
Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza92%
Valor normalizado: gai_detection_not_definitive_judgment
Última verificación
16 may 2026
Último cambio
16 may 2026
Evidencia original
Evidencia 1
The institution does not prohibit the use of GAI detection software at any stage of the academic integrity adjudication process but does recognize that the output of such tools cannot provide a definitive judgement on whether an academic integrity violation has taken place.
Idioma de la fuente
English (en)
Hash de instantánea
b4ff98fd…
Recuperado
16 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
GAI detection software
Docencia Afirmaciones revisadas: 1
Docencia
AUS policy says instructors must specify permitted generative AI tools, rationale, allowed assignments or activities, and an academic integrity statement in the course syllabus when AI tools are used.
Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza95%
Valor normalizado: instructors_must_state_ai_permissions_in_syllabus
Última verificación
16 may 2026
Último cambio
16 may 2026
Evidencia original
Evidencia 1
Course instructors must: Include the following details in the course syllabus: Name(s) of the generative AI tool(s) that can be used; Brief rationale for using the tool(s); Instructions on which assignments and class activities the tool(s) can be used for.
Idioma de la fuente
English (en)
Hash de instantánea
b4ff98fd…
Recuperado
16 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
Policy Statement, Course Instructor and Student Responsibilities
Reglas para herramientas de IA Afirmaciones revisadas: 1
Reglas para herramientas de IA
AUS policy says students are responsible for the accuracy of AI-generated output in their work and must ensure use complies with syllabus, iLearn updates, academic integrity policy, and IT acceptable use policy.
Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza93%
Valor normalizado: students_responsible_for_ai_accuracy_and_compliance
Última verificación
16 may 2026
Último cambio
16 may 2026
Evidencia original
Evidencia 1
Students must: Take full responsibility for the accuracy of AI generated output in any work they produce. Ensure that any use of the tool(s) is compliant with the course syllabus, any updates posted on the course ilearn page, the most recent versions of the AUS academic integrity policy, and the AUS IT acceptable use policy.
Idioma de la fuente
English (en)
Hash de instantánea
b4ff98fd…
Recuperado
16 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
Policy Statement, Student Responsibilities
Estado de la fuente Afirmaciones revisadas: 1
Estado de la fuente
AUS policy applies to undergraduate and graduate teaching and learning environments and says faculty research use of generative AI tools is not covered by this policy.
Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza91%
Valor normalizado: policy_scope_teaching_learning_not_faculty_research
Última verificación
16 may 2026
Último cambio
16 may 2026
Evidencia original
Evidencia 1
All undergraduate and graduate teaching and learning environments at AUS. The use of GAI tools in faculty research is not covered under this policy.
Idioma de la fuente
English (en)
Hash de instantánea
b4ff98fd…
Recuperado
16 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
Scope/applicability
Registro de fuentes
Fuentes oficiales
Fuentes: 2
2 official URLs; 2 source attributions and their captured versions retained.
0.f. Generative AI (GAI) Tools in Teaching and Learning Policy
aihub.aus.edu
Fuente oficial universitaria
aihub.aus.edu
Hash and captured version
0.f. Generative AI (GAI) Tools in Teaching and Learning Policy · 2026-05-16T04:18:00.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
Cita: University AI Policy Tracker. "American University of Sharjah AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 16, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/american-university-of-sharjah
El idioma original de la fuente universitaria sigue siendo el canónico. Este rastreador no es una declaración oficial de la universidad.
Saved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.
Preguntas frecuentes
Preguntas frecuentes
¿Puedo usar IA en mis trabajos?
American University of Sharjah has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
