Corrección de registros y pruebas

Add ANU, Edinburgh, and CUHK policy records with verified claims, exact presentation patches, and restored CUHK analysis dimensions.

El resumen se muestra en inglés.

Corrección histórica: los recuentos y afirmaciones reflejan esta versión, no la actual.

· v6-target-r7-candidate-20261021

JSON de cambios y fundamentos por versión

Historial de la versión V6 anterior

Record revision, scope and original evidence

Original evidence and audience, course and unit scopes are preserved. Tracker correction time is not a policy effective date.

The records below reflect this historical version, not the current policy record or current review conclusions.

f2056d14d900377259f898fffa6915abf0d133cefadd3ad035484fe4cf949153

{
  "addedClaimIds": [],
  "updatedClaimIds": [],
  "heldClaimIds": []
}
Previous baseline and review records
  • yale-claim-7 — Yale academic integrity guidance treats inserting AI-generated text into an assignment without proper attribution as an academic integrity violation.
  • cl-yale-university-aws-bedrock-151 — AWS Bedrock is listed for Yale University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
  • cl-yale-university-azure-ai-152 — Azure AI is listed for Yale University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
  • cl-yale-university-consensus-153 — Consensus is listed for Yale University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
  • cl-yale-university-copilot-studio-154 — Microsoft 365 Copilot Studio is listed for Yale University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
  • cl-yale-university-gemini-155 — Google Gemini for Education is listed for Yale University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
  • cl-yale-university-github-copilot-156 — GitHub Copilot is listed for Yale University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
  • cl-yale-university-institutional-ai-service-157 — BeaconAI is listed for Yale University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
  • cl-yale-university-institutional-ai-service-158 — Clarity Platform is listed for Yale University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
  • cl-yale-university-microsoft-copilot-159 — Copilot Chat is listed for Yale University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
  • cl-yale-university-microsoft-copilot-for-m365-160 — Microsoft 365 Copilot is listed for Yale University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
  • cl-yale-university-notebooklm-161 — NotebookLM is listed for Yale University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
  • cl-yale-university-portkey-162 — Portkey is listed for Yale University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
  • cl-yale-university-power-bi-copilot-163 — Power BI Copilot is listed for Yale University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
  • cl-yale-university-teams-premium-164 — Teams Premium is listed for Yale University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
  • cl-yale-university-zoom-ai-companion-165 — Yale's AI tools directory lists Zoom AI Companion for students, staff and faculty, free with a Zoom account and enabled by default for account holders. The Zoom AI Companion row lists the data classification level as High.
  • yale-claim-1 — Yale's September2023 Provost guidance says not to enter confidential, legally restricted, moderate-risk or high-risk Yale data into an AI tool. The current institutional directory separately lists Clarity for High-risk data with a special ePHI environment and DUA restrictions, while Radiate web search is listed for Low-risk data. It lists Copilot Chat Web as Moderate and Work as High, Gemini and NotebookLM as Moderate, and Claude Enterprise as High with a special ePHI environment. These platform classifications must be read with each service's access restrictions and applicable data agreements; they do not resolve authorization for every dataset.
  • yale-claim-10 — Yale lists Clarity Platform as a Yale-provided AI chatbot platform housed within Yale secure infrastructure and available to staff, faculty, and students.
  • yale-claim-2 — Yale expects faculty to give clear instructions on permitted AI use and attribution, and expects students to follow instructor guidelines for coursework.
  • yale-claim-5 — Yale states that instructors have authority within each course to determine whether and how students may use AI on assignments.
  • yale-claim-9 — Yale Poorvu Center guidance says classroom AI use must comply with FERPA and instructors cannot require students to create external accounts for tools Yale does not directly license.
  • yale-claim-11 — Yale describes Copilot Chat as not using conversations to train AI models or sharing data with OpenAI, while limiting high-risk data to Work search.
  • yale-claim-8 — The Yale Poorvu Center says it does not endorse AI detection software or enable such features in Canvas.
  • yale-claim-12 — Yale labels listed no-cost popular AI tools as informational only, not endorsed or provided by Yale, and for low-risk unsecured data experimentation and collaboration.
  • yale-claim-3 — Yale guidance tells users to review and verify AI-generated outputs, especially before publication.
  • yale-claim-4 — Yale guidance directs people considering an AI product to conduct an initial review for institutional security requirements.
  • yale-claim-6 — Yale Poorvu Center guidance says generative AI use is subject to individual course policies and encourages instructors to adapt model policies to their course goals.
  • draft-claim-yale-gsas-academic-integrity-ai — Under the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences (GSAS) 2026–2027 Personal Conduct and Academic Integrity Standards, inserting AI-generated text into an assignment without proper attribution is a violation of academic integrity standards, and using AI tools in a manner not authorized by faculty may also constitute a breach. Permissibility of AI writing tools varies from course to course and across research settings; graduate students are responsible for consulting relevant faculty members before using AI tools for coursework or research.
  • draft-claim-yale-gsas-writing-process-draft-history — Under GSAS 2026–2027 standards, graduate students have the responsibility to be able to articulate explicitly the process by which they conduct research and draft work, including the ability to provide a draft history of submitted work demonstrating original thought and composition. In evaluating disciplinary allegations involving inappropriate use of AI tools, the absence of this material or an inability to articulate clearly the research and writing process may be taken into account.
  • draft-claim-yale-gsas-discipline-committee-procedure — Under GSAS Committee on Regulations and Discipline procedures, students are asked to respond in writing to an allegation ordinarily within two weeks. Hearings are conducted by a panel of at least four members (including a usually non-voting secretary; three voting members including at least one student form a quorum). Decisions are made by secret ballot on a preponderance of the evidence; the committee recommends a sanction to the dean, who determines the penalty. Disciplinary decisions take immediate effect. Students may submit a written appeal to the Committee of Review no later than five business days after the committee decision. The Committee of Review (three members) may decline action or request reconsideration; on reconsideration, the committee cannot find culpability if previously exonerated or impose a more severe penalty. Scope is restricted to GSAS; research misconduct is referred under Research Misconduct procedures; undergraduate cases follow separate Yale College Executive Committee procedures.
  • draft-claim-yale-library-licensed-resources-ai — Yale Library guidance says licensed resources generally may not be used with AI because of copyright and vendor licensing agreements. Users should check the specific resource licence; the guide directs licence questions to the License Review Steering Committee and copyright questions to the Yale Copyright Librarian. The captured guide shows Last Updated September9,2026.