Corrección de registros y pruebas
Publish six reviewed QS35–40 V6 corrections with explicit held/history, source scope and confidence limitations.
El resumen se muestra en inglés.
Corrección histórica: los recuentos y afirmaciones reflejan esta versión, no la actual.
· qs35-40-v6-r3-20261022
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) · 26 reviewed records in this revision · Ver página de política
- Registros añadidos: 0; Registros corregidos: 0; En espera / excluidas de las conclusiones actuales: 0
Record revision, scope and original evidence
Original evidence and audience, course and unit scopes are preserved. Tracker correction time is not a policy effective date.
The records below reflect this historical version, not the current policy record or current review conclusions.
4ec5718f11f00c1aa797df9c1c9b1cc12b3d53008f55a1ea04c107a8e8bc24ae
{
"addedClaimIds": [],
"updatedClaimIds": [],
"heldClaimIds": []
}Previous baseline and review records- clm-massachusetts-institute-of-technology-high-risk-prohibition — MIT does not permit Medium Risk data in publicly available GenAI tools. High Risk MIT information must not be used with any GenAI tool, including MIT enterprise tools; report an existing high-risk disclosure to security@mit.edu immediately. Public tools are not recommended for Low Risk MIT data.
- clm-massachusetts-institute-of-technology-compliance — MIT guidance requires GenAI use to comply with applicable law, Institute policies, Information Protection guidelines, WISP, and applicable DLCI policies. The linked IS&T page still mentions EO 14110; that revoked order is not presented here as a current legal obligation.
- cl-massachusetts-institute-of-technology-adobe-firefly-1 — Adobe Firefly is listed by MIT IS&T for MIT faculty, staff, and students. Cost: Free. Institutional access and data restrictions do not establish assessment permission.
- cl-massachusetts-institute-of-technology-aws-bedrock-2 — AWS Bedrock is listed by MIT IS&T for MIT faculty and staff. Cost: Institute cost object required. Institutional access and data restrictions do not establish assessment permission.
- cl-massachusetts-institute-of-technology-aws-sagemaker-3 — AWS Sagemaker is listed by MIT IS&T for MIT faculty and staff. Cost: Institute cost object required. Institutional access and data restrictions do not establish assessment permission.
- cl-massachusetts-institute-of-technology-azure-openai-4 — Azure OpenAI is listed by MIT IS&T for MIT faculty and staff. Cost: Institute cost object required. Institutional access and data restrictions do not establish assessment permission.
- cl-massachusetts-institute-of-technology-chatgpt-5 — Open AI ChatGPT is listed by MIT IS&T for MIT faculty, staff, and students. Cost: Free. Institutional access and data restrictions do not establish assessment permission.
- cl-massachusetts-institute-of-technology-gemini-6 — Google Gemini is listed by MIT IS&T for MIT faculty, staff, and students. Cost: Free with an MIT Google Workspace account. Institutional access and data restrictions do not establish assessment permission.
- cl-massachusetts-institute-of-technology-google-vertex-ai-7 — Google Vertex is listed by MIT IS&T for MIT faculty and staff. Cost: Institute cost object required. Institutional access and data restrictions do not establish assessment permission.
- cl-massachusetts-institute-of-technology-microsoft-copilot-8 — Microsoft Copilot is listed by MIT IS&T for MIT faculty, staff, students, and affiliates. Cost: Free. Institutional access and data restrictions do not establish assessment permission.
- cl-massachusetts-institute-of-technology-microsoft-copilot-for-m365-9 — Microsoft Copilot for M365 is listed by MIT IS&T for MIT faculty, staff, and students. Cost: Institute cost object required. Institutional access and data restrictions do not establish assessment permission.
- cl-massachusetts-institute-of-technology-notebooklm-10 — Google NotebookLM is listed by MIT IS&T for MIT faculty, staff, and students. Cost: Free with an MIT Google Workspace account. Institutional access and data restrictions do not establish assessment permission.
- cl-massachusetts-institute-of-technology-salesforce-einstein-11 — Salesforce Einstein is listed by MIT IS&T for MIT faculty and staff. Cost: Institute cost object required. Institutional access and data restrictions do not establish assessment permission.
- cl-massachusetts-institute-of-technology-self-deploy-12 — Parley is listed by MIT IS&T for MIT faculty, staff, and students. Cost: Free. Institutional access and data restrictions do not establish assessment permission.
- cl-massachusetts-institute-of-technology-zoom-ai-companion-13 — Zoom AI Companion is listed by MIT IS&T for MIT faculty, staff, students, and affiliates. Cost: Free. Institutional access and data restrictions do not establish assessment permission.
- clm-massachusetts-institute-of-technology-disclosure — MIT Libraries advises citing or acknowledging AI contributions in academic papers and consulting the applicable school, class, and publication policies. This is citation guidance, not a universal assessment-use permission or a new university-wide mandatory disclosure rule.
- clm-massachusetts-institute-of-technology-ai-procurement-review — Purchasing new GenAI tools at MIT requires the VPF procurement process. For a tool not on IS&T's list, request an assessment from ai-guidance@mit.edu before use or purchase.
- clm-massachusetts-institute-of-technology-accuracy-responsibility — MIT Libraries states that authors are responsible for their work and advises verifying information provided by generative AI. Scope: academic and research writing guidance.
- clm-massachusetts-institute-of-technology-approved-tools-list — IS&T lists MIT-licensed GenAI tools approved for low- and medium-risk information. Tools not listed require an assessment before use or purchase; no GenAI tool is approved for High Risk MIT information. Tool access does not authorize coursework or exam use.
- clm-massachusetts-institute-of-technology-course-policy-framework — For Fall 2026, MIT faculty guidance states that there are no Institute-wide requirements for setting classroom AI-use policies. Instructors are encouraged to publish clear course policies; sample policy menus are not adopted rules for every course.
- clm-massachusetts-institute-of-technology-detector-output-not-sufficient — MIT's August 13, 2026 committee report states that COD does not consider AI-detector output alone sufficient for an AI-related academic integrity case. This records the committee's description of COD practice, not a blanket detector ban.
- clm-massachusetts-institute-of-technology-tll-detector-recommendation — MIT TLL strongly recommends against using AI-detection tools. This is teaching guidance, not a university-wide statutory prohibition.
- clm-massachusetts-institute-of-technology-thesis-ai-acknowledgment — MIT's August 2026 committee report recommends AI-use statements in all theses and says AI should not be listed as a co-author. Researchers should also check journal and conference requirements. This is a committee recommendation; a new mandatory thesis rule has not been established by this source.
- clm-massachusetts-institute-of-technology-human-subject-ai-consent — For applicable AI human-subjects research applications, COUHES guidance requires available Data Cards and adequate consent transparency. Model Cards are recommended when developing or further developing a model; this does not apply to all coursework.
- clm-massachusetts-institute-of-technology-cod-disability-accommodations — Students needing disability accommodations to participate in a COD process are directed to Disability and Access Services. This is a general disciplinary procedure resource, not an AI-specific sanction.
- clm-massachusetts-institute-of-technology-suspension-return-limits — Permission to return to MIT after suspension does not guarantee return to the same department, degree program, lab group, or related position. This is a general COD sanction condition, not an AI-specific penalty.