Diferencias de la versión
University of Brighton
Diferencia del seguimiento unificado para public-release-20260523-001. El texto completo de la página fuente no se publica; se muestran fragmentos cortos de pruebas en el idioma original para el contexto de la cita.
Diferencia unificada
Cambios en el seguimiento de versión a versión generados desde instantáneas públicas de lanzamientos.
Universidad of Brighton public-release-20260523-001 diferencias
Lanzamiento inicial con seguimiento.
+24-0
11 # University of Brighton AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+academic_integrity: University of Brighton student guidance tells students to check whether GenAI is allowed before using it for an assignment.
5+Evidence (en, 22f579a08424): Before using GenAI for an assignment, remember to check whether it is allowed, here is some guidance on using GenAI in assignments.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-20T13:52:00.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+ai_tool_treatment: University of Brighton guidance says the university has an institutional license for Microsoft Copilot chatbot, while noting that outputs still need to be verified and fact checked.
10+Evidence (en, 22f579a08424): The University of Brighton has an institutional license for Microsoft Copilot chatbot, which: Provides answers with citations to sources for extra transparency. Outputs still need to be verified and fact checked.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-20T13:52:00.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+teaching: University of Brighton GenAI ethics guidance frames ethical considerations as a starting point for students to see AI in context, think critically, and make informed decisions about how and when to use it.
15+Evidence (en, aba3bb01f35e): This information is not meant to discourage you from using AI. It is meant to provide a starting point to see AI in context, think critically and make informed decisions about how and when to use it.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-20T13:52:00.000Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+ai_tool_treatment: University of Brighton student guidance says information generated by GenAI requires fact-checking, should not be relied on alone, and should be verified via more reliable sources.
20+Evidence (en, 22f579a08424): Assume any information generated by GenAI requires fact-checking. Do not rely solely on the output without doing your own independent research. Verify the information via other more reliable sources.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-20T13:52:00.000Z
1022 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1123 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
24+academic_integrity: University of Brighton PGR admissions guidance says applicants may use GenAI to support applications, such as brainstorming or proofreading, but must not use GenAI to generate large amounts of content or write a personal statement or research proposal.
25+Evidence (en, deef1c18af39): You can use Gen AI tools (eg Chat GTP, Gemini) to support your application but you must not use Gen AI to generate large amounts of content. This means you may, for example, use AI to help you brainstorm ideas or proofread your writing but you must not ask AI to write your personal statement or research proposal.
26+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-20T13:52:00.000Z
1227 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1328 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
29+academic_integrity: University of Brighton PGR admissions guidance requires applicants who use AI to acknowledge how GenAI was used, and says applications may be withdrawn or studies terminated where false information or substantial GenAI fabrication is found.
30+Evidence (en, deef1c18af39): Applicants who use AI to develop or support their application must include a short statement acknowledging how Gen AI has been used. If it is suspected that an application is supported by false information or is substantially generated using Gen AI tools, we will withdraw the application.
31+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-20T13:52:00.000Z
1432 ## Source attribution added
1533 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
34+Source https://libguides.brighton.ac.uk/c.php?g=722321&p=5246954 snapshot aba3bb01f35eb4717c12bd779c9b7655e9ea1926cd29ddaa8a4c43c76453f115
35+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-20T13:52:00.000Z
1636 ## Source attribution added
1737 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
38+Source https://libguides.brighton.ac.uk/c.php?g=722321&p=5246956 snapshot 22f579a08424babd209b3fb4cc67e715b6c0e6b0999fc52e8619f565c546cb49
39+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-20T13:52:00.000Z
1840 ## Source attribution added
1941 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
42+Source https://www.brighton.ac.uk/research/postgraduate-research-degrees/applying/use-of-gen-ai-for-pgr-admissions.aspx snapshot deef1c18af39e11ab0f2f2a09f31ccfc936d3fe97e5d2ac57d6d3556777e26f4
43+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-20T13:52:00.000Z
Cómo leer esta diferencia
Metadatos de la versión del rastreador, no prueba directa del momento de publicación universitaria.
Las afirmaciones extraídas recientemente son adiciones al seguimiento y no necesariamente han sido publicadas por la universidad. Los cambios en las instantáneas de origen significan que la misma URL produjo un hash diferente; esto puede deberse al texto de la política, el diseño, la navegación o los metadatos.
Límite
Solo metadatos del rastreador
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.