Diferencias de la versión
University of Birmingham
Diferencia del seguimiento unificado para public-release-20260523-001. El texto completo de la página fuente no se publica; se muestran fragmentos cortos de pruebas en el idioma original para el contexto de la cita.
Diferencia unificada
Cambios en el seguimiento de versión a versión generados desde instantáneas públicas de lanzamientos.
Universidad of Birmingham public-release-20260523-001 diferencias
Lanzamiento inicial con seguimiento.
+62-0
11 # University of Birmingham AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+security_review: The University states that generative AI detection tools are not currently allowable and that student work should not be uploaded to generative AI detection software.
5+Evidence (en, e3477cdf3dfc): Tools designed to detect the use of generative AI are currently known to produce both false positives and false negatives. At present, the use of any such tools within the University is not allowable and no student work should be uploaded to generative AI detection software.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:35.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+teaching: University-wide AI marking principles allow academic staff to use AI systems to support assessment, grading, moderation and feedback after appropriate approval, while academic staff remain responsible for academic judgements and feedback.
10+Evidence (en, 85b28c0834c8): From the 1 September 2024, and upon the appropriate approval being first received, academic staff can utilise AI systems to support the assessment, grading and moderation of student work along with the provision of individualised student feedback. Where such tools are used, academic staff remain responsible for the academic judgements made on submitted student work and for any feedback they provide for learners.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:35.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+academic_integrity: For AI-supported marking and feedback, the University says all decisions, outcomes, and feedback must be reviewed by academic staff before release to students, and generative AI tools alone cannot allocate marks and student grades.
15+Evidence (en, 85b28c0834c8): All decisions, outcomes and feedback must be reviewed first by an academic member of staff before they are released to students. The use of generative AI tools on their own to allocate marks and student grades is not allowed.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:35.000Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+procurement: The AI tools licensing guidance tells users to review terms and conditions before registering for a new AI tool and to seek advice when data protection, accessibility, indemnity, or copyright concerns arise.
20+Evidence (en, 6e3fb5750799): Before registering for a new tool, it is crucial to review the Terms and Conditions (licence), which form the legal agreement between you and the supplier. If issues arise, such as non-compliance with accessibility or data protection standards, indemnification requirements, or copyright concerns, seek further guidance from your local licensing or IT procurement teams before registering for the service.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:35.000Z
1022 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1123 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
24+teaching: Academic staff are expected to state whether and how generative AI tools are permitted in assessments or assignments, including in course outlines, briefs, Canvas pages, and handbooks.
25+Evidence (en, e3477cdf3dfc): Within all modules, academic staff should clearly articulate if, and to what extent, the use of generative AI tools is permitted within assessments or assignments by students: This should be detailed within the course outline and all assessment and assignment briefs.
26+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:35.000Z
1227 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1328 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
29+academic_integrity: For assessments and assignments, students should assume generative AI use is not permitted unless the assessment or assignment explicitly states otherwise.
30+Evidence (en, e3477cdf3dfc): Unless explicitly stated otherwise, students should assume that the use of generative AI within an assessment or assignment is not permitted.
31+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:35.000Z
1432 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1533 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
34+procurement: The researcher tool-selection guidance points researchers to University-approved Enterprise Microsoft Copilot access and tells them to confirm the Enterprise data protection indicator before using it.
35+Evidence (en, 998c2811ee1e): The University provides approved access to the Enterprise version of Microsoft Co-Pilot which you can access via your University account. Ensure the green shield labelled Enterprise data protection applies to this chat is showing so that you know you are safely using the Enterprise version.
36+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:35.000Z
1637 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1738 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
39+teaching: University of Birmingham maintains a generative AI framework for teaching, learning, assessment, and support.
40+Evidence (en, e3477cdf3dfc): This guidance provides a framework for the implementation and use of generative AI models within teaching, learning, assessment, and support at the University of Birmingham.
41+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:35.000Z
1842 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1943 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
44+academic_integrity: For PGT dissertations, students should not submit AI-generated material or content unless the School specifically permits it, and permitted use must follow the University framework and be referenced.
45+Evidence (en, 0a408a47ec31): Students should not submit, within any part of their PGT dissertation, material or content that has been generated by AI tools unless their use has been specifically permitted by the School. Where the use of generative AI tools is permitted, the University's Framework for the Introduction and Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence within Teaching, Learning and Assessment must be followed and students required to appropriately reference its use.
46+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:35.000Z
2047 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
2148 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
49+privacy: The research AI guidance says personal, confidential, or sensitive data must not be entered into AI tools without clear justification, data minimisation, and a Data Protection Impact Assessment where applicable.
50+Evidence (en, a666e661d48b): Personal, confidential, or sensitive data must not be entered into AI tools without: clear justification (including consideration of locally-hosted versus cloud-based tools), data minimisation, Data Protection Impact Assessments (where applicable).
51+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:35.000Z
2252 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
2353 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
54+security_review: The research AI guidance says researchers should use University-endorsed AI tools for licensing, data protection, and information security compliance, and should justify and record use of unapproved or externally hosted tools.
55+Evidence (en, a666e661d48b): Researchers should use only University-endorsed AI tools to ensure compliance with licensing, data protection, and information security requirements. Use of unapproved or externally hosted tools should be justified and recorded in project documentation such as Data Management Plans or ethics submissions.
56+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:35.000Z
2457 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
2558 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
59+research: The research AI guidance applies to University of Birmingham researchers using, developing, or deploying AI, and places accountability for substantive claims, interpretations, and outputs on human researchers.
60+Evidence (en, a666e661d48b): This guidance applies to all researchers at the University of Birmingham who engage with Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the context of research, whether by using existing tools, developing new models, or deploying AI systems in real-world environments. A human researcher must be accountable for every substantive claim, interpretation, and output.
61+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:35.000Z
2662 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
2763 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
64+privacy: When AI-supported marking and feedback practices are used, student-facing information should explain why and how AI tools are used, human oversight, academic judgement, and privacy concerns about student data or work.
65+Evidence (en, 450ecfc450f8): Where AI supported marking and feedback practices and used, clear information should be provided to students on their use that details why, and how, AI tools are being used; emphasises that there remains human oversight; and addresses any privacy concerns that students might have about their data or work being uploaded to AI tools.
66+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:35.000Z
2867 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
2968 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
69+ai_tool_treatment: The student guidance allows use of generative AI tools as study aids for personal learning and research, while distinguishing that from submitting AI-generated output as the student's own assessment work.
70+Evidence (en, 69cc1b8d6ceb): The University's framework does allow you to use Generative AI tools as study aids for your personal learning and in your research. You are permitted to use these tools in this context, as long as you do not submit the actual AI-generated output as your own work for assessment.
71+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:35.000Z
3072 ## Source attribution added
3173 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
74+Source https://intranet.birmingham.ac.uk/student/libraries/asc/student-guidance-gai.aspx snapshot 69cc1b8d6cebf68bcfe715214c72f09554cd432764d662b208f8f47551b26912
75+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:35.000Z
3276 ## Source attribution added
3377 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
78+Source https://intranet.birmingham.ac.uk/student/libraries/copyright/researchers/ai-tools-licensing-review-guidance.aspx snapshot 6e3fb5750799f5240135a628cf67bd72b2907e32a88b47b0a6a7abdd4902eecb
79+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:35.000Z
3480 ## Source attribution added
3581 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
82+Source https://intranet.birmingham.ac.uk/student/libraries/copyright/researchers/responsible-ai-tool-selection.aspx snapshot 998c2811ee1e4503a9a476fd0275fd4123f5df648617bdc4a44d0f6bb5799841
83+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:35.000Z
3684 ## Source attribution added
3785 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
86+Source https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/research/ethics-integrity/guidance-for-use-of-ai-in-research.docx snapshot a666e661d48bdbbf7356a56c3897931a0d6039f0fc3e2c98debbe2ca55ea4115
87+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:35.000Z
3888 ## Source attribution added
3989 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
90+Source https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/libraries/education-excellence/gai snapshot e3477cdf3dfc7f0943407c07c9de1b41d319e2c989789358bc919e6ee360d5e9
91+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:35.000Z
4092 ## Source attribution added
4193 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
94+Source https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/libraries/education-excellence/gai/acknowledging-gai-by-students snapshot def6296b7eaf74cb72b60191f583d7f9ee38fa05ec749fc956cfca84cccc0976
95+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:35.000Z
4296 ## Source attribution added
4397 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
98+Source https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/libraries/education-excellence/gai/guidance-pgt-dissertations snapshot 0a408a47ec310bf70d97adcd538be9fc04e7922fd580806c88db58386c944f50
99+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:35.000Z
44100 ## Source attribution added
45101 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
102+Source https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/libraries/education-excellence/gai/handbook-canvas-gai-use snapshot 19df847972390388a283eed461e8da41250a24675f4293bb826463c7a7d35bd1
103+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:35.000Z
46104 ## Source attribution added
47105 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
106+Source https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/libraries/education-excellence/gai/principles-on-the-use-of-ai snapshot 85b28c0834c81217a47a5e36d3fdcbf7745a749fa17853222d0a15e4a8a1f869
107+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:35.000Z
48108 ## Source attribution added
49109 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
110+Source https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/libraries/education-excellence/gai/student-facing-module-statement-ai-marking-feedback snapshot 450ecfc450f89aecb3bc2dc6c53cc9ac50e993f57e062ce2bfbb3016cf2a7262
111+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-13T05:00:35.000Z
Cómo leer esta diferencia
Metadatos de la versión del rastreador, no prueba directa del momento de publicación universitaria.
Las afirmaciones extraídas recientemente son adiciones al seguimiento y no necesariamente han sido publicadas por la universidad. Los cambios en las instantáneas de origen significan que la misma URL produjo un hash diferente; esto puede deberse al texto de la política, el diseño, la navegación o los metadatos.
Límite
Solo metadatos del rastreador
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.