University AI Policy Tracker

Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.

APIGitHub

Change log

University of Westminster

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 20, 2026Last changedMay 20, 2026Claims6Sources6
University pagePublic JSON

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Westminster currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 6 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 20, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

University of Westminster current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+12-0
11 # University of Westminster AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Westminster student guidance says students must disclose any use of GenAI for assessed coursework and remain responsible for the originality, accuracy, and integrity of their work.
3+Evidence (en, f1641c171295): With every assessed submission where AI was used, you must include: Artificial Intelligence Use Declaration ... I confirm that I have not used AI to generate content that I am presenting as my own work.
4+academic_integrity: Westminster's student GenAI rules identify using AI to write essays, reports, or code on a student's behalf, using AI to carry out analysis or arguments, and submitting AI-generated content without declaring it as not permitted.
5+Evidence (en, 0d4fad489b3a): At the University of Westminster, the following is NOT permitted: Using AI to write essays, reports, or code on your behalf ... Using AI to carry out your analysis or construct arguments ... Submitting AI-generated content without declaring it.
6+ai_tool_treatment: University of Westminster's GenAI policy applies to students, colleagues, third-party suppliers, and partners, and frames GenAI as an assistant or creative partner rather than a replacement for human ingenuity.
7+Evidence (en, b27408c86243): It applies to all students. colleagues, third-party suppliers, and partners engaged in using or developing such systems within or on behalf of our institution.
8+research: Westminster's academic research GenAI guidance tells researchers and academic staff not to enter confidential or sensitive data into public or commercial generative AI tools, and to have specialist tools assessed by ISS when confidential data is involved.
9+Evidence (en, aba52de83f93): Do not enter confidential or sensitive data, including non-public research data, personal information, or any other data classified as confidential, into public or commercial generative AI tools.
10+security_review: University of Westminster's GenAI policy requires GenAI-related data to be handled in line with data protection and security requirements, and says high-risk GenAI systems should not go into production without remediation.
11+Evidence (en, b27408c86243): All data used in the development and operation of GenAI systems must respect the privacy and rights of individuals involved and be securely transmitted, stored and managed in accordance with the University of Westminster's Data Protection Policy and relevant data protection laws.
12+research: Westminster doctoral researcher guidance says doctoral assessments and research outputs must be the researcher's own original work, and that using GenAI to generate doctoral research content without agreement and disclosure is academic misconduct.
13+Evidence (en, 1a045d67d563): In summary Using GenAI to generate content for your doctoral research without agreement and disclosure is unethical and violates academic and research integrity. Doing this is academic misconduct.

Claim changes

6 claim records

research

Westminster doctoral researcher guidance says doctoral assessments and research outputs must be the researcher's own original work, and that using GenAI to generate doctoral research content without agreement and disclosure is academic misconduct.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

research

Westminster's academic research GenAI guidance tells researchers and academic staff not to enter confidential or sensitive data into public or commercial generative AI tools, and to have specialist tools assessed by ISS when confidential data is involved.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Westminster's student GenAI rules identify using AI to write essays, reports, or code on a student's behalf, using AI to carry out analysis or arguments, and submitting AI-generated content without declaring it as not permitted.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Westminster student guidance says students must disclose any use of GenAI for assessed coursework and remain responsible for the originality, accuracy, and integrity of their work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

security_review

University of Westminster's GenAI policy requires GenAI-related data to be handled in line with data protection and security requirements, and says high-risk GenAI systems should not go into production without remediation.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

University of Westminster's GenAI policy applies to students, colleagues, third-party suppliers, and partners, and frames GenAI as an assistant or creative partner rather than a replacement for human ingenuity.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

6 source attributions