privacy
UPC states a commitment not to introduce personal, sensitive, confidential, or intellectual-property data into AI systems without express authorization, an established criterion, or adequate anonymization.
Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.
Change log
Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.
Current public record freshness and review state.
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya · BarcelonaTech (UPC) currently has 11 source-backed claim records and 9 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.
Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.
11 claim records
UPC states a commitment not to introduce personal, sensitive, confidential, or intellectual-property data into AI systems without express authorization, an established criterion, or adequate anonymization.
UPC IT identifies Google Gemini and Microsoft Copilot as UPC institutional generative AI tools that the UPC community can use free of charge and safely from UPC accounts.
UPC IT guidance recommends not sending legally protected or confidential data to external AI applications; for non-institutional tools it says not to enter protected or confidential data and to consult ATIC.
UPC says it provides staff with institutional AI tools whose use is governed by UPC AI principles and whose data are protected and not used to train AI models.
UPC library guidance tells students not to present AI-generated third-party content as their own, to ask instructors about each course’s AI rules, and to use AI as an assistant rather than as the author of academic work.
ESEIAAT allows generative AI use in final-study work writing only under stated conditions and requires a declaration section describing the tools, purpose, affected sections, student review, and responsibility statement.
UPC frames its institutional AI governance around LEIA principles that guide daily practice in teaching, research, and university management.
ESEIAAT states that transparency about generative AI use is mandatory, but declaration alone does not make the use appropriate; assessment considers real authorship, critical thinking, and academic-level coherence.
UPC IT’s Microsoft Copilot Chat page tells users not to share confidential or personal information, to authenticate with a UPC account, and to use Copilot only when the green shield indicates data will not be used for AI training.
UPC presents Google Gemini, NotebookLM, Copilot, and Edge as an institutional AI toolkit for students and links responsible study use to the UPC Academic Integrity Commitment.
UPC library research guidance says generative AI can support parts of the research process, but outputs and data should be used critically and verified.
9 source attributions
official_guidance checked May 16, 2026
official_guidance checked May 16, 2026
official_guidance checked May 16, 2026
official_guidance checked May 16, 2026
official_guidance checked May 16, 2026
official_guidance checked May 16, 2026
official_guidance checked May 16, 2026
official_guidance checked May 16, 2026
official_guidance checked May 16, 2026