Release diff
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Unified tracker diff for public-release-20260523-001. Full source-page text is not published; short original-language evidence snippets are shown for citation context.
Unified diff
Release-to-release tracker changes generated from public release snapshots.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill public-release-20260523-001 diff
Initial tracked release.
+26-0
11 # University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+teaching: UNC-Chapel Hill's faculty grading and assessment guidance says AI systems used for grading or feedback must be institutionally approved and compliant with data security and privacy standards; faculty using GenAI for grading retain full responsibility for evaluative decisions and feedback.
5+Evidence (en-US, 9c6c27e19c1c): Faculty must ensure that any AI system used for grading or feedback is institutionally approved and compliant with data security and privacy standards. Uploading student work to consumer-grade AI platforms not contracted by the university is inconsistent with student privacy laws and university policy.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T14:13:00Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+teaching: UNC-Chapel Hill's faculty grading and assessment guidance says students must be able to request a full instructor-led review if they disagree with an AI-generated grade or have concerns about automated feedback.
10+Evidence (en-US, 9c6c27e19c1c): Students must be able to request a full instructor-led review if they disagree with an AI- generated grade or have concerns about automated feedback, without additional scrutiny, justification, or penalty.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T14:13:00Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+teaching: UNC-Chapel Hill faculty guidance encourages instructors to state course and assignment AI expectations in the syllabus and tells Carolina students to follow the specific AI guidelines in that syllabus.
15+Evidence (en-US, 2e373948ed87): Conveying your stance on students’ use of AI in your course is important; it clarifies your expectations and ensures that any use of AI supports rather than frustrates your learning objectives.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T14:12:20Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+privacy: UNC-Chapel Hill's research guidance treats entering private or confidential information, research data, grant proposals, or analytical results into public generative AI tools as a public disclosure of that information.
20+Evidence (en-US, 1d0574d903f2): Uploading information (e.g., research data, grant proposals, unpublished manuscripts, or analytical results) to a public AI tool is equivalent to releasing it publicly; thus, before any information from you or another individual is uploaded to a public AI tool, appropriate steps must be taken to ensure that the disclosure of that information is consistent with all rules and laws related to the handling of private information.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T14:12:00Z
1022 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1123 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
24+research: UNC-Chapel Hill's research generative AI guidance applies to members of the research community involved in research under the auspices of the University, including faculty, staff, students, guest researchers, collaborators, and consultants.
25+Evidence (en-US, 1d0574d903f2): This guidance applies to all members of the research community, including faculty, staff (SHRA and EHRA non-faculty), students (undergraduate, graduate and professional), guest researchers (e.g., unpaid volunteers, interns, and visiting scholars), collaborators, and consultants involved in research occurring under the auspices of the University.
26+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T14:12:00Z
1227 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1328 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
29+security_review: UNC-Chapel Hill's administrative generative AI guidance says sensitive information should not be entered into generative AI tools unless the Information Security Office has completed a risk assessment and the Data Governance Oversight Group has approved the tool for sensitive information.
30+Evidence (en-US, 64b070af83d4): Do not enter sensitive information (as defined by the UNC-Chapel Hill Information Classification Standard) into generative AI tools unless the University’s Information Security Office (ISO) has conducted a risk assessment of the generative AI tool and the University’s Data Governance Oversight Group (DGOG) has approved the tool to handle sensitive information.
31+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T14:12:40Z
1432 ## Source attribution added
1533 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
34+Source https://ai.unc.edu/ai-guidance-for-faculty/ snapshot 2e373948ed876e8ace7da6bd84ba95c4ca94ef56ed402524e0afa9e226cc7caa
35+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T14:12:20Z
1636 ## Source attribution added
1737 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
38+Source https://ai.unc.edu/research-generative-ai-usage-guidance/ snapshot 1d0574d903f2fa9e8a3ba569d78c5b12ea72edc7ddb380d583b8e02dfd808b72
39+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T14:12:00Z
1840 ## Source attribution added
1941 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
42+Source https://ai.unc.edu/staff-generative-ai-usage-guidance/ snapshot 64b070af83d482591b889995010e7d930ac98bf0bd79372f4cbfcd9411ef654d
43+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T14:12:40Z
2044 ## Source attribution added
2145 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
46+Source https://ai.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/1362/2026/03/Guidance-for-Faculty-Use-of-AI-in-Grading-and-Assessment-_Final.pdf snapshot 9c6c27e19c1c5dfe8d213b415e8da4a6b30ff24294b9753613ca36da2ef4b0a6
47+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T14:13:00Z
How to read this diff
Tracker release metadata, not direct proof of university publication timing.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes mean the same URL produced a different hash; that may be policy text, layout, navigation, or metadata.
Boundary
Tracker metadata only
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.