Change log

National Tsing Hua University - NTHU

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

National Tsing Hua University - NTHU currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 15, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for National Tsing Hua University - NTHU. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

National Tsing Hua University - NTHU combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+16-0
11 # National Tsing Hua University - NTHU AI policy record
2+source_status: NTHU announced the Guidelines for Collaboration, Co-learning, and Cultivation of Artificial Intelligence Competencies in University Education on May 1, 2023 in response to generative AI tools including ChatGPT.
3+Evidence (en, 59c18a868db0): In response to the advent of generative artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot ChatGPT, National Tsing Hua University (NTHU) in Taiwan announced on May 1st the Guidelines for Collaboration, Co-learning, and Cultivation of Artificial Intelligence Competencies in University Education.
4+teaching: NTHU's Chinese AI collaboration and literacy guideline recommends that faculty and students use AI in educational settings transparently and responsibly, with instructors clearly stating course AI rules and both students and instructors honestly disclosing AI use when relevant.
5+Evidence (zh-Hant, d4f103f6dbf8): 我們建議本校師生在教育場域中使用各種人工智慧(artificial intelligence,以下簡稱AI,不限於生成式人工智能)產品時應抱持透明與負責的態度:透明:教師應明確指出課程對於使用AI的規範,學生與教師使用AI時應誠實揭露。負責:教師與學生應理解AI僅能作為素材提供的來源之一。
6+academic_integrity: For educator teaching, NTHU's Chinese AI guideline says the university respects instructors' course AI-tool strategies and that instructors should state student AI-use rules in syllabi, especially correct AI citation and disclosure of the use process.
7+Evidence (zh-Hant, d4f103f6dbf8): 教師教學 R 校方尊重教師對於課程使用 AI 工具的策略,教師應於課程大綱中敘明學生 使用 AI 的規則,尤其是正確引註 AI 並揭露使用的歷程。
8+teaching: NTHU CTLD's course-syllabi generative-AI guidance encourages faculty members to specify course logistics and AIGC policies using four options: unrestricted use with no disclosure required, conditionally open, prohibited use, or not applicable.
9+Evidence (en, e73a4f6c4cd5): Faculty members are encouraged to specify course logistics and policies regarding AIGC using one of the following four options: 1. Unrestricted use with no disclosure required 2. Conditionally open; please specify how to utilize generative AI in course output 3. Prohibited use; please specify relevant monitoring mechanisms 4. Not applicable
10+academic_integrity: NTHU's Chinese AI collaboration and literacy guideline says faculty and students should be able to check the accuracy of AI-generated content and take responsibility for content they produce.
11+Evidence (zh-Hant, d4f103f6dbf8): 負責:教師與學生應理解AI僅能作為素材提供的來源之一。使用時應具備檢核其正確性的判讀能力,並對自己產生的內容負責。
12+teaching: NTHU's Chinese AI guideline gives assessment recommendations: depending on the course, AI assistance may be allowed for assignments, but diverse submission formats are recommended; exam questions should emphasize deeper reasoning, creativity, analysis, and critical thinking.
13+Evidence (zh-Hant, d4f103f6dbf8): 學習評量(作業/報告) R 依據課程屬性,可同意使用 AI 協助答題,但建議以多元形式繳交作業... 學習評量(考試) R 出題方向建議以更多需要深層推理、創造力、分析... 批判的問題,而非單純引述規則性問題。
14+teaching: NTHU's Chinese AI guideline describes AI competence as broader than programming and says NTHU plans to cultivate student AI competence through formal and informal learning, including foundational and specialized AI courses and integrating AI into courses across disciplines.
15+Evidence (zh-Hant, d4f103f6dbf8): AI 素養不僅是關涉撰寫程式的能力... 本校規劃培養學生 AI 素養:統整正式(課程、研究)與非正式的學習(社團、活動、競賽、實習)... 提供基礎及專業的 AI 課程... 將 AI 融入課程。
16+academic_integrity: In CTLD's example ethics statements for conditionally open generative-AI use, undisclosed usage may allow instructors, the institution, or relevant units to reevaluate an assignment or report or withhold scores.
17+Evidence (en, e73a4f6c4cd5): If usage is discovered without proper disclosure, instructors, the institution, or relevant units have the right to reevaluate the assignment or report or withhold scores.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

8 claim records

source_status

NTHU announced the Guidelines for Collaboration, Co-learning, and Cultivation of Artificial Intelligence Competencies in University Education on May 1, 2023 in response to generative AI tools including ChatGPT.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

NTHU's Chinese AI collaboration and literacy guideline recommends that faculty and students use AI in educational settings transparently and responsibly, with instructors clearly stating course AI rules and both students and instructors honestly disclosing AI use when relevant.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languageszh-Hant

academic_integrity

For educator teaching, NTHU's Chinese AI guideline says the university respects instructors' course AI-tool strategies and that instructors should state student AI-use rules in syllabi, especially correct AI citation and disclosure of the use process.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languageszh-Hant

teaching

NTHU CTLD's course-syllabi generative-AI guidance encourages faculty members to specify course logistics and AIGC policies using four options: unrestricted use with no disclosure required, conditionally open, prohibited use, or not applicable.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

NTHU's Chinese AI collaboration and literacy guideline says faculty and students should be able to check the accuracy of AI-generated content and take responsibility for content they produce.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languageszh-Hant

teaching

NTHU's Chinese AI guideline gives assessment recommendations: depending on the course, AI assistance may be allowed for assignments, but diverse submission formats are recommended; exam questions should emphasize deeper reasoning, creativity, analysis, and critical thinking.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languageszh-Hant

teaching

NTHU's Chinese AI guideline describes AI competence as broader than programming and says NTHU plans to cultivate student AI competence through formal and informal learning, including foundational and specialized AI courses and integrating AI into courses across disciplines.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languageszh-Hant

academic_integrity

In CTLD's example ethics statements for conditionally open generative-AI use, undisclosed usage may allow instructors, the institution, or relevant units to reevaluate an assignment or report or withhold scores.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence89%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

4 source attributions