source_status
A central, binding LUH AI policy source was found for teaching, while separate central FAQ and ZQS pages are guidance or non-binding context and institute PDFs were not used for broad claims.
Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.
Change log
Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.
Current public record freshness and review state.
Leibniz University Hannover currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.
Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.
8 claim records
A central, binding LUH AI policy source was found for teaching, while separate central FAQ and ZQS pages are guidance or non-binding context and institute PDFs were not used for broad claims.
LUH student guidance says students should clarify with instructors how AI tools may be used for coursework or exams and remain responsible for lawful, responsible, and transparent use or non-use of AI tools; the ZQS page itself is explicitly non-binding.
LUH provides LUHKI2 as a free, WebSSO-accessible, ChatGPT-based AI platform for university members without external registration, with stated anonymized GDPR-compliant processing and operational caveats about OpenAI chat-history retention and current file-upload storage.
For examinations, LUH limits any mandatory AI use to centrally provided LUH systems, permits student choice of AI systems for independently written work only where exam rules allow and AI-generated content is identified, and prohibits automated correction or full/partial entry of exam work into an AI system.
The LUH KI-Richtlinie prohibits processing personal data in AI systems without explicit KI-Rat approval and prohibits entering trade secrets or sensitive research data into AI systems.
LUH says centrally provided AI systems should be used preferentially; mandatory use of decentralized AI systems in teaching requires KI-Rat approval and is allowed only if no personal data are processed.
LUH offers AI competence training, and teachers who use AI systems in a course are required to integrate training materials or provide corresponding training for users.
Leibniz University Hannover has a central KI-Richtlinie that is binding for teachers and users at LUH who use AI systems in teaching.
5 source attributions
official_guidance checked May 16, 2026
official_policy_page checked May 16, 2026
official_guidance checked May 16, 2026
official_guidance checked May 16, 2026
official_guidance checked May 16, 2026