Gothenburg, Sweden Last checked
এই পৃষ্ঠাটি প্রকাশ্য নীতি রেকর্ড থেকে সংকলিত এবং এখনও আলাদাভাবে পর্যালোচনা করা হয়নি।
Independent · Open access · Not an official university page
Student guide · Course examiner rules and thesis ethics
Course coordinators and examiners decide examination AI rules for each course at Chalmers. For thesis work, students must be transparent and consult supervisors on ethical uncertainties; never upload unpublished thesis text or sensitive data to chatbots.
A complete student policy summary is not available yet; see the collected claims and sources.
Chalmers Library guidance highlights that course examiners set rules for individual courses. Presenting AI text without citation is treated as plagiarism or ghostwriting. Uploading text intended for a thesis, dissertation, or publication to a chatbot risks copyright loss and data compromise.
Required
Chalmers University of Technology has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Required
Chalmers University of Technology has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Required
Chalmers University of Technology has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Restricted
Chalmers University of Technology has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Required
Chalmers University of Technology has 3 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: required.
Restricted
Chalmers University of Technology has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Required
Chalmers University of Technology has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Not mentioned in reviewed sources
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
Not mentioned in reviewed sources
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
Tool access is not permission to use AI in an assessment. Check your assignment rules, eligible users and data restrictions.
Archived tool record; consult the official source for current access.
Original quotation
Chalmers Library's teacher guidance says all Chalmers students and employees have access to Microsoft Copilot, while Chalmers does not currently have a license for ChatGPT.Original quotation
Chalmers Library says students and employees have Microsoft Copilot access and that Chalmers does not currently license ChatGPT.Original quotation
Chalmers Library's teacher guidance says all Chalmers students and employees have access to Microsoft Copilot, while Chalmers does not currently have a license for ChatGPT.Original quotation
All students and employees at Chalmers have access to the chatbot Microsoft Copilot.Original quotation
In addition, Chalmers offers Microsoft Copilot Pro licenses to employees who are interested, please contact your immediate manager.Original quotation
Chalmers Library says students and employees have Microsoft Copilot access and that Chalmers does not currently license ChatGPT.Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.
Update records are not available for this page yet.
Reviewed record
6 reviewed claims
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: student AI use requires transparency and citation in academic-integrity context
Original evidence
Evidence 1Claiming that what someone else has written is your own text without referencing to it correctly is considered as plagiarism. In relation to AI, this can be interpreted as either plagiarism or ghostwriting, so you need to be fully transparent in your use of AI. Describe what you have done and cite correctly, including which AI tool you have used.Localized display only
Chalmers Library links AI use to plagiarism or ghostwriting risk and tells students to be transparent and cite the AI tool used.
Privacy
Normalized value: thesis AI-tool uncertainty around data privacy calls for supervisor or collaborator consultation
Original evidence
Evidence 1Always consult with your Chalmers’ supervisor or relevant industry/public sector collaborators before using AI tools if you have any uncertainties, particularly concerning data privacy and ethical issues.Localized display only
Chalmers says thesis students should consult a supervisor or collaborator before AI use when data privacy or ethical issues are uncertain.
Privacy
Normalized value: avoid uploading sensitive private copyrighted or unpublished scholarly material to chatbots
Original evidence
Evidence 1Because of this, you should not upload material that contains sensitive or private information, or any material protected by copyright law, for example PDFs of scientific articles that you’ve downloaded from library databases. If you have text intended for a thesis, dissertation, or scientific publication, you should not submit it to a chatbot, as doing so may mean relinquishing your copyright to that material.Localized display only
Chalmers Library cautions against uploading sensitive, private, copyrighted, or unpublished scholarly material to chatbots.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: thesis AI-tool use may be permitted with responsibility and transparent disclosure
Original evidence
Evidence 1You are required to assume full responsibility for your work and must be capable of justifying the choices you've made regarding its content. This includes engaging in discussions about and defending the role AI played in shaping your thesis, demonstrating a clear understanding of how it contributed.Localized display only
Chalmers requires thesis authors to take full responsibility for their work and be able to justify the role AI played.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: course-level coordinator and examiner decide examination AI-tool use
Original evidence
Evidence 1It is up to the coordinator and examiner for each individual course to decide whether and how AI tools are allowed to be used within the framework of the various examinations. Remember to ask at the beginning of each course!Localized display only
Chalmers Library says course coordinators and examiners decide whether and how AI tools are allowed in each course's examinations.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: students and employees have Microsoft Copilot access; no current Chalmers ChatGPT license
Original evidence
Evidence 1All students and employees at Chalmers have access to the chatbot Microsoft Copilot. In addition, Chalmers offers Microsoft Copilot Pro licenses to employees who are interested, please contact your immediate manager. Chalmers does not currently have a license for ChatGPT.Localized display only
Chalmers Library says students and employees have Microsoft Copilot access and that Chalmers does not currently license ChatGPT.
Source record
4 sources
4 official URLs; 4 source attributions and their captured versions retained.
guides.lib.chalmers.se
University official source
guides.lib.chalmers.se
Ethical Use of AI · 2026-05-15T03:18:30.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
2457d2ebbd303fe096181c07e1296c3de71344238b94244307fc8163ac1b13ba
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
guides.lib.chalmers.se
University official source
guides.lib.chalmers.se
For Teachers · 2026-05-15T03:18:00.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
74b4f3217b745b0ab46cc420c722ef0304a075b1c441e8decc25fba47c139443
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
www.chalmers.se
University official source
chalmers.se
Regulations for the use of AI tools in thesis work · 2026-05-15T03:17:30.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
c434a0c201b19a4f1c047e85b37365be9feab7094c30d628b20990824ca0756b
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
guides.lib.chalmers.se
University official source
guides.lib.chalmers.se
Using AI as a Student · 2026-05-15T03:17:00.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
55616ff35c1f76734a36de02ca8bab6961f03dfa85a684f6ef87e2fdc94f0ced
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
Explore
4 records
Outdated or incorrect policy? Report an issue ↗
Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Chalmers University of Technology AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 15, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/chalmers-university-of-technology
Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.
Open change logSaved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.
Chalmers University of Technology has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
View evidence →Chalmers University of Technology has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
View evidence →Chalmers University of Technology has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
View evidence →Chalmers University of Technology has 3 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: required.
View evidence →Chalmers University of Technology has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
View evidence →Chalmers University of Technology has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
View evidence →Chalmers University of Technology has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
View evidence →No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
View evidence →No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
View evidence →
