變更紀錄
追蹤器歷史：0 筆發布紀錄。
目前公開紀錄的時效性與審查狀態。
4 條當前主張；4 個官方來源。
此頁面整合了所有公開發布版本差異，適用於 Chungnam National University。個別發布快照仍可從其特定版本 URL 取得。
此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。
本追蹤器並非法律意見，亦非學術誠信建議；除非所連結的來源為大學本身的官方網頁，否則亦不構成大學的正式聲明。
新擷取的主張屬於追蹤器的新增項目，不一定是大學新近發布的內容。來源快照的變更表示同一來源網址的雜湊值有所改變，本身並不等同於政策變動。
此次版本差異的語意分類。
僅顯示具備完全符合 Claim ID 的已記錄比較。
此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。
追蹤器歷史：0 筆發布紀錄。
現行主張紀錄：4。
Chungnam National University's learner guide states that not following syllabus or instructor-agreed generative-AI criteria, or inappropriate AI use, may be regarded as cheating; examples include presenting AI answers as one's own, failing to disclose AI use, or using AI in a class where it is fully prohibited.
Chungnam National University's learner guidance says learners should follow instructor-provided generative-AI criteria, use AI as a learning support tool, verify AI outputs against reliable sources, and clearly mark the source, generation method, and scope of AI-generated materials.
Chungnam National University's instructor guidance says that when generative AI is used in class, instructors should state its purpose and scope in the syllabus, explain correct use and standards for cheating or plagiarism, and guide students to cite AI-generated outputs.
Chungnam National University's Education Innovation Office publishes generative-AI teaching and learning principles saying instructors and learners should discuss AI use in teaching and learning and comply with the agreed terms.
官方來源紀錄：4。
official_guidance 追蹤器檢查於 May 21, 2026, 2:30 PM
official_guidance 追蹤器檢查於 May 21, 2026, 2:30 PM
official_guidance 追蹤器檢查於 May 21, 2026, 2:31 PM
official_guidance 追蹤器檢查於 May 21, 2026, 2:32 PM
