ai_tool_treatment
CEPRUD says it evaluates market AI tools for university uses and tells users to review privacy terms and conditions before using any listed tool.
Change log
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Current public record freshness and review state.
University of Granada currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
6 claim records
CEPRUD says it evaluates market AI tools for university uses and tells users to review privacy terms and conditions before using any listed tool.
UGR research guidance recommends declaring AI use with technical and methodological details, verifying and supervising AI outputs, assuming authorship responsibility, and protecting data privacy.
UGR states that PDI and PTGAS can use a protected Copilot chat through the institutional Microsoft account, while public generative AI tools can reuse entered data for model training.
UGR guidance recommends avoiding sensitive information in public AI tools, using secure institutional tools, and prioritizing tools provided or contracted by UGR because they undergo privacy and security review.
UGR guidance recommends that students declare AI use in work, take responsibility for the content, avoid plagiarism, and use AI as learning support rather than a substitute for personal effort.
UGR has published Council of Government-presented recommendations for AI use, but the document says it is not normative and does not establish what is permitted or prohibited.
4 source attributions
official_pdf Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 7:16 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 7:23 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 7:14 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 7:12 PM