Change log

University of Cologne

Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Cologne currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.

No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.

Claim changes

5 claim records

teaching

On its central teaching page, the University of Cologne says its current teaching-and-learning guidelines for generative AI are to address and explore AI-supported writing proactively and to use AI systems with maximum transparency.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesde

academic_integrity

The University of Cologne Justitiariat says current AI text detector software is not sufficient evidence of deception by itself; additional circumstances are needed to prove a deception act.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesde

academic_integrity

For term papers, theses, take-home exams, papers, and similar work, the University of Cologne Justitiariat says AI use is generally possible if independent work remains, and examiners may require disclosure of both the AI use and the related prompts depending on the use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesde

ai_tool_treatment

The University of Cologne Justitiariat says AI use in examinations is not objectionable under examination law when the student still produces their own independent work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesde

academic_integrity

The University of Cologne Justitiariat says an exam or significant parts of an exam fully generated by AI are not an independent performance and are prohibited as deception.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesde

Source snapshots

2 source attributions