teaching
On its central teaching page, the University of Cologne says its current teaching-and-learning guidelines for generative AI are to address and explore AI-supported writing proactively and to use AI systems with maximum transparency.
Change log
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Current public record freshness and review state.
University of Cologne currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
5 claim records
On its central teaching page, the University of Cologne says its current teaching-and-learning guidelines for generative AI are to address and explore AI-supported writing proactively and to use AI systems with maximum transparency.
The University of Cologne Justitiariat says current AI text detector software is not sufficient evidence of deception by itself; additional circumstances are needed to prove a deception act.
For term papers, theses, take-home exams, papers, and similar work, the University of Cologne Justitiariat says AI use is generally possible if independent work remains, and examiners may require disclosure of both the AI use and the related prompts depending on the use.
The University of Cologne Justitiariat says AI use in examinations is not objectionable under examination law when the student still produces their own independent work.
The University of Cologne Justitiariat says an exam or significant parts of an exam fully generated by AI are not an independent performance and are prohibited as deception.
2 source attributions
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 3:06 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 3:06 AM