Różnice wersji
University of Pennsylvania
Zjednoczona różnica trackerów dla public-release-20260523-001. Pełny tekst strony źródłowej nie jest publikowany; krótkie fragmenty dowodów w języku oryginalnym są wyświetlane dla kontekstu cytowania.
Zjednoczona różnica
Zmiany w śledzeniu między wydaniem a wydaniem generowane z publicznych migawek wydań.
Uczelnia of Pennsylvania public-release-20260523-001 różnica
Pierwsze śledzone wydanie.
+50-0
11 # University of Pennsylvania AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+other: Penn requires all community members (educators, staff, researchers, and students) to be transparent about the use of AI and to disclose when a work product was created wholly or partially using an AI tool.
5+Evidence (en, 37de46a962d8): Be transparent about the use of AI. Disclose when a work product was created wholly or partially using an AI tool and, if appropriate, how AI was used to create the work product.
46 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
57 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
8+other: Penn researchers should obtain IRB approvals prior to exposing research participant data to AI tools and should exercise caution when research involves high-risk data including PII and health information.
9+Evidence (en, 37de46a962d8): Researchers should adhere to federal or international requirements on obtaining informed consent, and Institutional Review Board approvals should be obtained prior to exposing research participant data to AI tools. Caution should be adopted when research involves the examination of high-risk data, including Personally Identifiable Information (PII) and research participant health information (both identifiable and non-identifiable) exposed to AI.
610 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
711 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
12+other: Penn's Office of Audit, Compliance & Privacy mandates that users of publicly available (unlicensed) AI tools must not enter any information that could identify a student, including names, ID numbers, email addresses, or detailed descriptions of student work or engagement that could be identifiable to others.
13+Evidence (en, 1915e317dd89): Do not enter any information that could identify a student. This includes names, ID numbers, or email addresses, as well as detailed descriptions of student work or engagement in class that could be identifiable to others.
814 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
915 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
16+other: Penn mandates that student work (papers, projects) must not be entered into unlicensed AI tools without the student's permission, even if anonymized, because this work is part of the student's confidential academic record.
17+Evidence (en, 1915e317dd89): Do not enter student work (e.g., papers, projects) without the student's permission, even if it is anonymized. This work is part of the student's confidential academic record.
1018 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1119 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
20+other: Instructors must not require students to enter their own work into unlicensed AI tools or use such tools in assignments; unlicensed tools may be used optionally by students at the instructor's discretion, but Penn-licensed tools should be used for mandatory coursework components.
21+Evidence (en, 1915e317dd89): Do not require students to enter their own work into an unlicensed AI tool or use it in assignments. Unlicensed tools may be used optionally by students at the instructor's discretion but consider using a Penn-licensed tool for mandatory components of coursework to protect student data.
1222 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1323 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
24+other: Individual instructors at Penn determine their own policies related to acceptable student use of generative AI in coursework.
25+Evidence (en, 1915e317dd89): Individual instructors determine their own policies related to acceptable student use of generative AI in coursework.
1426 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1527 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
28+other: Penn provides several licensed AI tools to its community, including Copilot Chat (Basic, free), Adobe Express (free), ChatGPT-EDU (purchase required), M365 Copilot Premium (purchase required), Gemini for Google Workspace (purchase required), Google NotebookLM (purchase required), Grammarly Pro (purchase required), Snowflake Data Analytics (purchase required), and Zoom AI Companion (free).
29+Evidence (en, 1915e317dd89): Penn offers access to a number of AI tools. The guidelines for protecting student privacy while using these tools are informed by the data risk classification and the privacy agreements of the tool being used.
1630 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1731 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
32+other: At Wharton Academy, AI-generated work should be cited like any other reference material, including how and where students used AI-generated information; using AI-generated work without crediting the source is considered plagiarism.
33+Evidence (en, 4d88979a3603): Using somebody else's work without crediting the source – including generative AI — is plagiarism. Guided by the policies of faculty, instructional teams, and staff, AI-generated work should be cited like any other reference material, including how and where students used AI-generated information.
1834 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1935 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
36+other: Wharton Academy prohibits students from using AI to complete personal reflection or opinion-based tasks, from using AI to complete group assignments instead of collaborating with peers, and from using AI to cheat on exams or tests.
37+Evidence (en, 4d88979a3603): Don't use AI for personal reflection or opinion-based tasks. We are interested in hearing your opinions, your stories and your thoughts. Don't rely on AI for group assignments. Using AI to complete your portion of a group project instead of collaborating with your peers is considered academic dishonesty. Don't use AI to cheat on exams or tests.
2038 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
2139 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
40+other: Wharton Academy prohibits students from directly copying answers from generative AI tools and submitting them as their own, from using AI to paraphrase or rewrite plagiarized content, and from posting AI-generated discussion posts within course community forums.
41+Evidence (en, 4d88979a3603): Don't directly copy answers from generative AI tools and submit as your own. Don't use AI to paraphrase or rewrite plagiarized content. Don't post AI-generated discussion posts within the course community forum.
2242 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
2343 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
44+other: Wharton Academy permits students to use generative AI for brainstorming, learning efficiency, getting prompts, exploring different perspectives, asking for templates, getting preliminary feedback on written work, and language translation, at the discretion of faculty and instructional teams.
45+Evidence (en, 4d88979a3603): At the discretion of faculty, instructional teams and staff, Wharton Academy students may use generative AI tools.
2446 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
2547 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
48+other: Users of AI at Penn are accountable for AI-generated content and should validate its accuracy with trusted first-party sources, being wary of misinformation or hallucinations.
49+Evidence (en, 37de46a962d8): The user of AI should endeavor to validate the accuracy of created content with trusted first party sources and monitor the reliability of that content. Users are accountable for their use of content created by AI and should be wary of misinformation or "hallucinations" by AI tools (e.g., citations to publications or source materials that do not exist or references that otherwise distort the truth).
2650 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
2751 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
52+other: Penn users should not input moderate or high-risk Penn data (per the Penn Data Risk Classification) or intellectual property into AI tools without careful consideration of data use policies, a protective contract, and review by Penn's Privacy Office and Office of Information Security.
53+Evidence (en, 37de46a962d8): Users of AI should avoid sharing personal or sensitive data with the tool and should not input moderate or high-risk Penn data as defined by the Penn Data Risk Classification, or intellectual property, without: Careful consideration and understanding of the tool's use of Penn data and the service provider's stated rights to the data, including, but not limited to whether the service provider offers the option to opt-out of using customer's data to train the AI; A contract in place to protect Penn data; and Review by Penn's Privacy Office and consultation with the Office of Information Security as coordinated by Procurement when moderate or high-risk data is involved.
2854 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
2955 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
56+other: It is not permissible under HIPAA or Penn Medicine policy to share patient or research participant information with open or public AI tools and services such as ChatGPT; individual patient data and data sets (even if deidentified) may not be exposed to such tools absent institutional approval.
57+Evidence (en, 37de46a962d8): It is not permissible under the Health Information Portability & Accountability Act (HIPAA) or Penn Medicine policy to share patient or research participant information in connection with open or public AI tools and services, such as ChatGPT. This is because, as currently configured, such open or public tools and services can use and share any data without regard to HIPAA restrictions and other protections. Therefore, individual patient data and patient data sets (even if deidentified) may not be exposed to open or public AI tools or services, absent institutional approval.
3058 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
3159 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
60+other: Penn community members should avoid uploading confidential or proprietary information to AI platforms prior to seeking patent or copyright protection, as doing so could jeopardize intellectual property rights.
61+Evidence (en, 37de46a962d8): Members of the Penn community should adhere to established principles of respect for intellectual property, particularly copyrights when considering the creation of new data sets for training AI models. Avoid uploading confidential and/or proprietary information to AI platforms prior to seeking patent or copyright protection, as doing so could jeopardize IP rights.
3262 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
3363 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
64+other: University business processes using AI should have oversight, review, and verification of AI outputs in place to ensure reliability, consistency, and accuracy.
65+Evidence (en, 37de46a962d8): While automating tasks using AI may improve operational efficiency for University Business processes, oversight and review of the use of AI and verification of its outputs for these University business processes should be in place to ensure reliability, consistency, and accuracy.
3466 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
3567 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
68+other: Penn educators should provide students with clear guidelines on the use of AI within coursework and should disclose to students when course materials have been created with AI or when AI detection software will be used.
69+Evidence (en, 37de46a962d8): As expectations may vary between classes and instructors, it is important for instructors to provide students with clear guidelines similar to the guidelines on collaboration, on the use of AI within coursework, and when and how the use of AI within a course should be cited. Disclose to students when course materials have been created with the use of AI and when AI detection software will be used in the course.
3670 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
3771 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
72+other: In the absence of other guidance, Penn students should treat the use of AI as they would treat assistance from another person — if it is unacceptable to have another person substantially complete a task like writing an essay, it is also unacceptable to have AI complete the task.
73+Evidence (en, 37de46a962d8): In the absence of other guidance, treat the use of AI as you would treat assistance from another person. For example, this means if it is unacceptable to have another person substantially complete a task like writing an essay, it is also unacceptable to have AI to complete the task.
3874 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
3975 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
76+other: Penn researchers should consult with department leadership and their discipline's publishing standards to determine how AI use should be accounted for with regard to authorship in publications.
77+Evidence (en, 37de46a962d8): Consult with your department leadership and your discipline's publishing standards to determine how the use of AI should be accounted for with regard to authorship in publications.
4078 ## Source attribution added
4179 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
80+Source https://academy.wharton.upenn.edu/ai-policy/ snapshot 4d88979a360331eac5a73374686cdfc1253dc9e9f260201910843be2f1ccc156
81+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T04:55:45Z
4282 ## Source attribution added
4383 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
84+Source https://almanac.upenn.edu/articles/of-record-guidance-for-the-university-of-pennsylvania-community-on-use-of-generative-artificial-intelligence snapshot 2bac3392e3f6473acb4bdedfcd237daefff3fe5d34ecf30e2078091febf31f2c
85+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T04:55:45Z
4486 ## Source attribution added
4587 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
88+Source https://catalog.upenn.edu/pennbook/code-of-academic-integrity/ snapshot eff235360c9757a704ee0835fa48524e6556c864b68133aa9c593900358a12e1
89+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T04:55:45Z
4690 ## Source attribution added
4791 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
92+Source https://cetli.upenn.edu/resources/generative-ai/ snapshot dcc7eb4cba6625c4f5fa2bf9999343eddc5908975b986595820e089009f95a8b
93+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T04:55:45Z
4894 ## Source attribution added
4995 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
96+Source https://cetli.upenn.edu/resources/generative-ai/penn-ai-guidance-and-policies/ snapshot 1915e317dd898991e8423bef970e386dd3f6f6a90ab76e6b36f941a3b9cba3b3
97+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T04:55:45Z
5098 ## Source attribution added
5199 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
100+Source https://isc.upenn.edu/security/AI-guidance snapshot 37de46a962d87d00351f27cd01c2b6f1efdd0f012d8073df6f3383a3f2497bb5
101+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T04:55:45Z
Jak czytać tę różnicę
Metadane wersji trackerów, a nie bezpośredni dowód czasu publikacji przez uczelnię.
Właśnie wyodrębnione twierdzenia to dodania do trackeru i niekoniecznie są nowo opublikowane przez uniwersytet. Zmiany w migawce źródła oznaczają, że ten sam URL wygenerował inną sumę kontrolną; może to być treść polityki, układ, nawigacja lub metadane.
Granica
Tylko metadane trackerów
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.