Różnice wersji
University of Cambridge
Zjednoczona różnica trackerów dla public-release-20260523-001. Pełny tekst strony źródłowej nie jest publikowany; krótkie fragmenty dowodów w języku oryginalnym są wyświetlane dla kontekstu cytowania.
Zjednoczona różnica
Zmiany w śledzeniu między wydaniem a wydaniem generowane z publicznych migawek wydań.
Uczelnia of Cambridge public-release-20260523-001 różnica
Pierwsze śledzone wydanie.
+48-0
11 # University of Cambridge AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+academic_integrity: A student using any unacknowledged content generated by artificial intelligence within a summative assessment as though it is their own work constitutes academic misconduct, unless explicitly stated otherwise in the assessment brief.
5+Evidence (en, 6161308c973d): A student using any unacknowledged content generated by artificial intelligence within a summative assessment as though it is their own work constitutes academic misconduct, unless explicitly stated otherwise in the assessment brief.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-05T16:17:36.144Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+academic_integrity: Staff should not rely on AI detection software as it is not proven to be accurate or reliable and provides no evidence to support investigations into the use of GenAI.
10+Evidence (en, 6161308c973d): Not relying on AI detection software as it is not proven to be accurate or reliable and provides no evidence to support investigations into the use of GenAI.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-05T16:17:36.144Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+teaching: Examiners are not permitted to upload, copy, or share student work with Generative AI tools and Large Language Models. Examiners may not use tools such as ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google Bard, or Microsoft Copilot to analyse student work or provide written feedback. Examiners may use these tools to support their own writing in documenting feedback (e.g. consolidating personal notes and rephrasing comments).
15+Evidence (en, 6161308c973d): Examiners across all programmes of study (including Undergraduate, Postgraduate Taught, and Postgraduate Research) are not permitted to upload, copy, or share student work with Generative AI (GenAI) tools and Large Language Models (LLMs). Examiners may not use tools, such as ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google Bard, or Microsoft Copilot, to analyse work submitted by students and provide written feedback. Where preferred, however, examiners may use these tools to support their own writing in the process of documenting feedback (e.g., consolidating personal notes and rephrasing comments).
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-05T16:17:36.144Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+teaching: The University of Cambridge broadly permits the appropriate use of GenAI tools and related software. Students are permitted to make appropriate use of GenAI tools to support their personal study, research and formative work. Staff are permitted to make appropriate use of GenAI tools to support their own work.
20+Evidence (en, ed37b015a563): The University of Cambridge broadly permits the appropriate use of GenAI tools and related software, however, due to the variety of disciplines and research areas present at the institution, there is need for more nuanced guidance at local levels.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-05T16:17:36.180Z
1022 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1123 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
24+teaching: When using GenAI tools, users should: remain aware of privacy and data implications and not share anything personal or sensitive; understand ethical implications as tools often have limited attribution; acknowledge use of GenAI if it makes a significant contribution to substantive work; and take responsibility for ensuring use is conducted reasonably, lawfully, and in conjunction with relevant University policies.
25+Evidence (en, ed37b015a563): Remain aware of the potential privacy and data implications in using tools without due care. Some tools may store or otherwise use information provided to train their language models and you should not share anything personal or sensitive. Acknowledge use of GenAI if it is used to make a significant and unrevised contribution to a substantive or impactful piece of work. Take responsibility for ensuring any use of GenAI is conducted reasonably, lawfully, and in conjunction with relevant University policies and procedures.
26+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-05T16:17:36.180Z
1227 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1328 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
29+source_status: Cambridge provides an AI Policy Framework for triposes, departments, faculties, and colleges to determine their own local allowance for the use of AI, rather than a single university-wide AI policy. The framework is adapted from a policy proposal by Dr Claire Benn and Dr John Burden from the Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence.
30+Evidence (en, 302c375ca4d8): Given the wide variety of subjects and teaching and learning styles at the University of Cambridge, it would be difficult to provide a policy that accurately represents the multitude of ambitions, considerations, and feelings surrounding the use of AI in education. We instead will be providing a framework for triposes, departments, faculties, and colleges, to determine their own local allowance and rational for the use of AI within their own contexts.
31+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-05T16:17:36.112Z
1432 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1533 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
34+privacy: Staff must avoid inputting confidential, sensitive or personal information into GenAI tools unless warranted and only in accordance with guidance. Inputting data into a free or unlicensed GenAI tool could be considered equivalent to putting it into the public domain, signifying a potential personal data breach.
35+Evidence (en, 3ae7dc73509c): Regardless of the work being undertaken, it is recommended that staff avoid inputting confidential, sensitive or personal information into GenAI tools unless warranted and only in accordance with this guidance.
36+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-05T16:17:36.250Z
1637 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1738 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
39+procurement: The University's standard licensed GenAI tools are Microsoft 365 Copilot, Google Gemini, and Google NotebookLM. Use of other licensed GenAI tools is not prohibited but must be procured in accordance with applicable procurement policy, including completion of risk assessments such as DPIAs and/or ISRAs. The public, free versions of Copilot, Gemini and NotebookLM must not be used for University activities.
40+Evidence (en, 3ae7dc73509c): The University’s standard licensed GenAI tools are Copilot, Gemini and NotebookLM, and these are the tools that should be used to process personal data, where necessary, for which the University is responsible.
41+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-05T16:17:36.250Z
1842 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1943 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
44+privacy: Data input into the University's licensed versions of Copilot, Gemini and NotebookLM is not used to train those tools. Inputting data into free or unlicensed GenAI tools could result in data being used for training, which may not be a lawful use of personal data.
45+Evidence (en, 3ae7dc73509c): Information input into GenAI tools is also often used to train those tools, which may not be a lawful use of personal data – especially if that data cannot be retrieved or deleted, for example from an AI neural network. Data input into the University’s licensed versions of Copilot, Gemini and NotebookLM is not used to train those tools.
46+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-05T16:17:36.250Z
2047 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
2148 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
49+ai_tool_treatment: All GenAI outputs must be thoroughly evaluated by a human being before they are used. Use of GenAI must be acknowledged if it makes a significant and unrevised contribution to a substantive or impactful piece of work. Staff are responsible for ensuring any use of GenAI is conducted reasonably, lawfully and in conjunction with relevant University policies.
50+Evidence (en, 3ae7dc73509c): Risk mitigation(s): Ensure that all GenAI outputs are thoroughly evaluated by a human being before they are used. Ensure use of GenAI is acknowledged if it is used to make a significant and unrevised contribution to a substantive or impactful piece of work such as the production of content for formal policies or strategic reports.
51+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-05T16:17:36.250Z
2252 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
2353 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
54+privacy: Staff must consider the purpose for which data was collected before inputting it into GenAI tools. Data must be collected, held and used for only that purpose. It is not appropriate to use personal data collected for a different purpose with a GenAI tool. Automated decision-making involving GenAI requires human involvement in the decision-making process.
55+Evidence (en, 3ae7dc73509c): Data must be collected, held and used for only that purpose – for example, as part of a governance process – and any use of AI must be compatible with that reason. With some exceptions (e.g. for academic research), it is not appropriate to use personal data that was collected for a different purpose to do something else with a GenAI tool. In such circumstances, it is imperative that a human being is ultimately involved in the decision-making process.
56+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-05T16:17:36.250Z
2457 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
2558 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
59+security_review: The University's Information Security Risk Assessment (ISRA) and Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) processes remain the relevant risk assessment processes for GenAI use. The Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) continues to apply, including compliance monitoring and enforcement provisions, when using GenAI tools.
60+Evidence (en, 3ae7dc73509c): In the limited circumstances where a formal risk assessment is required, the University Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) and Information Security Risk Assessment (ISRA) processes remain the relevant risk assessments processes to follow.
61+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-05T16:17:36.250Z
2662 ## Source attribution added
2763 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
64+Source https://blendedlearning.cam.ac.uk/ai-policy-framework snapshot 302c375ca4d833fc139f28a463695e5ded09fcd91d5bbb1ed5ce422793556c0e
65+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-05T16:17:36.112Z
2866 ## Source attribution added
2967 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
68+Source https://blendedlearning.cam.ac.uk/artificial-intelligence-and-education/generative-ai-and-assessment snapshot 6161308c973dc0f2b6475bb14f5d742f8111860ecf3b504e011644f24b4c83b7
69+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-05T16:17:36.144Z
3070 ## Source attribution added
3171 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
72+Source https://blendedlearning.cam.ac.uk/artificial-intelligence-and-education/generative-ai-and-education snapshot ed37b015a563c98b7c75db062d1611988c7ec53f8426b87d644decc8dc1fc9ee
73+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-05T16:17:36.180Z
3274 ## Source attribution added
3375 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
76+Source https://blendedlearning.cam.ac.uk/artificial-intelligence-and-education/using-generative-ai snapshot 92c8f403f21328cbccfdd1094080e2f5885dbf19a483b2013c9119cf917a5315
77+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-05T16:17:36.062Z
3478 ## Source attribution added
3579 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
80+Source https://www.educationalpolicy.admin.cam.ac.uk/plagiarism-and-academic-misconduct snapshot 9c66aad77ce01aa3c32a934b964c6f7fd0b7949f9983a616ef0c1f14c74f0f7a
81+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-05T16:20:56.177Z
3682 ## Source attribution added
3783 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
84+Source https://www.information-compliance.admin.cam.ac.uk/data-protection/guidance/ai-guidance snapshot 3ae7dc73509c43e87ebc9c757253f27448c0ec9a736f0a80e24e39cbbeb194c1
85+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-05T16:17:36.250Z
Jak czytać tę różnicę
Metadane wersji trackerów, a nie bezpośredni dowód czasu publikacji przez uczelnię.
Właśnie wyodrębnione twierdzenia to dodania do trackeru i niekoniecznie są nowo opublikowane przez uniwersytet. Zmiany w migawce źródła oznaczają, że ten sam URL wygenerował inną sumę kontrolną; może to być treść polityki, układ, nawigacja lub metadane.
Granica
Tylko metadane trackerów
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.