Różnice wersji
Stanford University
Zjednoczona różnica trackerów dla public-release-20260523-001. Pełny tekst strony źródłowej nie jest publikowany; krótkie fragmenty dowodów w języku oryginalnym są wyświetlane dla kontekstu cytowania.
Zjednoczona różnica
Zmiany w śledzeniu między wydaniem a wydaniem generowane z publicznych migawek wydań.
Stanford University public-release-20260523-001 różnica
Pierwsze śledzone wydanie.
+53-0
11 # Stanford University AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+academic_integrity: Stanford's BCA issued guidance on generative AI use, and the Office of Community Standards recommends that instructors give advance notice to students when using AI detection software.
5+Evidence (en, 93e12eb9985a): To give sufficient space for instructors to explore uses of generative AI tools in their courses, and to set clear guidelines to students about what uses are and are not consistent with the Stanford Honor Code, the BCA has set forth policy guidance regarding generative AI in the context of coursework. Note: Guidance adopted on February 16, 2023. As part of the BCA's guidance on clear communication of a course's generative AI policy, OCS recommends course instructors provide clear advance notice that they may use detection software to review work submitted for use of generative AI.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T01:07:22Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+academic_integrity: Stanford's Bechtel Center for Advising (BCA) provides guidance on generative AI in the context of the Honor Code, noting that acceptable AI use depends on individual instructor and course policies.
10+Evidence (en, 93e12eb9985a): To give sufficient space for instructors to explore uses of generative AI tools in their courses, and to set clear guidelines to students about what uses are and are not consistent with the Stanford Honor Code, the BCA has set forth policy guidance regarding generative AI in the context of coursework. Note: Guidance adopted on February 16, 2023.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T01:07:22Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+teaching: For Stanford Graduate School of Business (GSB) MBA and MSx courses, instructors may not ban student use of AI tools for take-home coursework, including assignments and exams. Instructors may choose whether to allow AI for in-class work. For PhD and undergraduate courses, GSB follows the university-wide Generative AI Policy Guidance from the Office of Community Standards.
15+Evidence (en, 7a0aaf5bf9c0): GSB Policy MBA/MSx courses: Instructors may not ban student use of AI tools for take-home coursework, including assignments and exams. Instructors may choose whether to allow student use of AI tools for in-class work, including exams. PhD/Undergraduate courses: Follow the Generative AI Policy Guidance from Stanford's Office of Community Standards.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T01:07:22Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+teaching: Stanford Law School instructors set their own AI policies; in the absence of a course-specific policy, students may use generative AI to support learning and develop or refine their own ideas, but may not use AI to generate content presented as their own work. Using AI during an exam or to draft/revise submitted work is not permitted unless disclosed in advance and explicitly authorized in writing by the instructor. Unauthorized use may result in an F grade and/or referral to Stanford's Office of Community Standards.
20+Evidence (en, 6b775ecc8b3f): In the absence of a course-specific AI policy set by the instructor, students may use generative AI tools to support their learning and to aid in the development or refinement of their own ideas, provided they do not use such tools to generate content that is then presented as their own work. The use of generative AI while taking an exam or to draft or revise any portion of submitted work is not permitted unless (1) fully disclosed in advance of its use by the student to the instructor, and (2) explicitly authorized by the instructor in writing prior to the student's use of the tool. Unauthorized use of AI tools may result in a lower grade, including a grade of F, and/or a referral to Sta...
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T01:07:22Z
1022 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1123 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
24+teaching: Stanford School of Medicine MD and MSPA programs have a formal AI policy: students may use AI for learning, clarification, and grammar/style editing unless contrary to assignment instructions. AI use for closed-book exams or assignments where internet is restricted is prohibited unless explicitly authorized by faculty. Students are responsible for all AI-generated content they submit, must disclose and cite substantial AI contributions, and violations may result in disciplinary action.
25+Evidence (en, 230e4b8ce6f9): Learning and Clarification: Students may utilize AI to enhance their understanding of medical concepts, definitions, and for grammar/style editing, provided it does not conflict with specific assignment instructions or be inconsistent with faculty-authorized tasks. The use of AI tools is discouraged for any activities in which students are evaluated on their own knowledge or skills, unless explicitly granted permission by the faculty. Any substantial contributions from AI tools on assignments, presentations, and scholarly abstracts or proposals must be disclosed and properly cited. Students are responsible for any AI-generated content they submit, even if flawed or biased. All MD and MSPA...
26+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T01:07:22Z
1227 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1328 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
29+privacy: Stanford School of Medicine MD and MSPA programs strictly prohibit entering confidential research data, patient data, or protected health information (PHI) into public AI platforms. Use of patient-identifying information or PHI in public AI tools is strictly forbidden. Students must use Stanford-approved AI platforms (e.g., Stanford Healthcare Secure GPT, Stanford AI Playground) when handling sensitive data.
30+Evidence (en, 230e4b8ce6f9): To ensure that patient confidentiality is maintained at all times, no confidential research, patient data, or other protected health information (PHI) is to be entered into public AI platforms (e.g., ChatGPT, Gemini, OpenEvidence, Doximity, etc.). Patient Confidential Data: The use of patient-identifying information or protected health information (PHI) in public AI tools is strictly forbidden.
31+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T01:07:22Z
1432 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1533 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
34+teaching: Stanford's Program in Writing and Rhetoric (PWR) prohibits students from using generative AI or LLMs to compose drafts or revisions for any major assignment in PWR courses, including composing or revising portions of essays or scripts, including paraphrases of LLM-generated writing. Students may not rely on generative AI summaries of sources. Violation of PWR's AI policy is treated as an Honor Code violation and results in referral to the Office of Community Standards.
35+Evidence (en, 2e601e4a5b47): Students may not use generative AI or LLMs to compose the drafts or revisions for any of the major assignments in their PWR classes. This includes using generative AI to compose or revise portions of their essay or scripts (from individual phrases or sentences to longer passages) or including in their essays/scripts paraphrases of LLM-generated writing or paraphrases of source material generated by LLMs. Violation of PWR's AI policy is considered an Honor Code violation and will result in the involvement of Stanford's Office of Community Standards (OCS).
36+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T01:07:22Z
1637 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1738 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
39+other: Stanford University Communications (UComm) has issued AI guidelines for marketing and communications staff requiring: human oversight of all AI-generated content (non-delegable personal responsibility), adherence to university policies, prohibition on inputting confidential or legally privileged information into generative AI tools, prohibition on using AI to promote for-profit organizations or engage in political advocacy, and prohibition on using high-risk data in prompts. Stanford AI Playground is recommended as the primary platform. These guidelines apply to all regular staff, interns, casual employees, and consultants in marketing and communications functions.
40+Evidence (en, 9c5e79c1de80): These guidelines apply to all regular staff, interns, casual employees, and consultants. You are personally responsible for oversight of any content you produce using AI to ensure that content is accurate, in alignment with institutional values, and in compliance with the policies set forth in this document. You are personally responsible for conforming to this requirement and this responsibility may not be delegated to another employee. You may not provide any confidential or legally privileged information of Stanford or a third party to generative AI tools. Do not use high-risk data in your prompts or include such data as attachments to your prompts.
41+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T01:07:22Z
1842 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1943 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
44+other: Stanford University IT (UIT) advises users to avoid inputting Moderate or High Risk Data into third-party AI platforms or tools not covered by a Stanford Business Associates Agreement, whether using a personal or Stanford account. Users should opt out of sharing chat data with third-party AI providers when possible.
45+Evidence (en, 889383e99058): Avoid inputting any sensitive data, such as Moderate or High Risk Data, whether using a personal or Stanford account with a third-party AI platform or tool that is not covered by a Stanford Business Associates Agreement. It's recommended to opt out of sharing data for AI iterative learning wherever possible. If generative AI is to be used to interact with users, obtain their informed consent. If your final product is significantly influenced by an AI platform, consider informing people how you used AI and cite appropriately.
46+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T01:07:22Z
2047 ## Source attribution added
2148 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
49+Source https://communitystandards.stanford.edu/generative-ai-policy-guidance snapshot 93e12eb9985a32023807300b0474d1f5d6e2ebf3a3d39dab18febe5ae6b47866
50+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T01:07:22Z
2251 ## Source attribution added
2352 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
53+Source https://ctl.stanford.edu/aimes snapshot 57e3fd0e204837f5675b4d7574bc0e80c8a3ea77ed35f25d633d980877f8d2f9
54+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T01:07:22Z
2455 ## Source attribution added
2556 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
57+Source https://ctl.stanford.edu/aimes/ai-learning-guide-students snapshot c9dd6af1164a6ab29ac9dde288a088cf60cd67846700fdbc28dc822851135ab6
58+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T01:07:22Z
2659 ## Source attribution added
2760 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
61+Source https://ctl.stanford.edu/aimes/ai-teaching-strategies snapshot 65d00154666c1b4fbf8e2c8123467527013c2e721c00ffbceb9d61c185f9896e
62+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T01:07:22Z
2863 ## Source attribution added
2964 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
65+Source https://law.stanford.edu/office-of-student-affairs/use-of-generative-ai-technology/ snapshot 6b775ecc8b3fbe6f25ddf584e4e69297b73474f5b44330c0130dfaba915c0be9
66+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T01:07:22Z
3067 ## Source attribution added
3168 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
69+Source https://med.stanford.edu/md/mdhandbook/section-3-md-requirements-procedures/3-32--generative-artificial-intelligence--ai--policy.html snapshot 230e4b8ce6f9a1a61f5408696e2021dfc45f79cb7d105f850eb22413e24fc385
70+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T01:07:22Z
3271 ## Source attribution added
3372 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
73+Source https://provost.stanford.edu/2025/01/09/report-of-the-ai-at-stanford-advisory-committee/ snapshot c05edef17acd65c126b10c2dbc09754f6c45166b3a3e9c22b5e0d93afc8823a7
74+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T01:07:22Z
3475 ## Source attribution added
3576 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
77+Source https://pwr.stanford.edu/about-pwr/pwr-policies/pwr-policy-use-genai-and-llms snapshot 2e601e4a5b47215c842712627c3631375d0eb2ac936abbf1816a04b1bc8c0d2b
78+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T01:07:22Z
3679 ## Source attribution added
3780 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
81+Source https://tlhub.stanford.edu/docs/course-policies-on-generative-ai-use/ snapshot 7a0aaf5bf9c0e744c48334dbb29c2358e597631cec05db608374c0ff3bdcd950
82+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T01:07:22Z
3883 ## Source attribution added
3984 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
85+Source https://ucomm.stanford.edu/policies-and-guidance/ai-guidelines-marketing-and-communications snapshot 9c5e79c1de806eb64ddd8fc7c3e70d95c560eaab5d03f1246333e9076e3a7c3b
86+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T01:07:22Z
4087 ## Source attribution added
4188 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
89+Source https://uit.stanford.edu/ai snapshot 4a81586fe631363a2723400e8cb208bdae6a10b4967630ca57c30a7c94b76005
90+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T01:07:22Z
4291 ## Source attribution added
4392 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
93+Source https://uit.stanford.edu/aiplayground snapshot 56d7c59c0b23d411ad4aa7ec660eadd239c0a02c6f4bbf186cd75e79054971e6
94+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T01:07:22Z
4495 ## Source attribution added
4596 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
97+Source https://uit.stanford.edu/security/responsibleai snapshot 889383e990589f5baaeb6fd771505b4dfb6b5fcadef2d644ea5535950237194e
98+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T01:07:22Z
Jak czytać tę różnicę
Metadane wersji trackerów, a nie bezpośredni dowód czasu publikacji przez uczelnię.
Właśnie wyodrębnione twierdzenia to dodania do trackeru i niekoniecznie są nowo opublikowane przez uniwersytet. Zmiany w migawce źródła oznaczają, że ten sam URL wygenerował inną sumę kontrolną; może to być treść polityki, układ, nawigacja lub metadane.
Granica
Tylko metadane trackerów
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.