11 # Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+ai_tool_treatment: LMU IfKW student guidance says AI may be used in assessments only with explicit teacher permission; if no explicit permission is given, students must assume AI use is not allowed.
5+Evidence (en, a82c2400f286): Therefore, in general terms, the use of AI may be allowed in assessments only with the explicit permission of the teacher. If no explicit permission is given, then the students must assume the use of AI is not allowed.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-12T14:09:15Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+academic_integrity: LMU IfKW guidance treats verbatim or minimally changed AI-generated text without proper attribution as plagiarism, and says significant unattributed AI-generated text in assessed work can receive grade 5 (failed).
10+Evidence (en, a82c2400f286): To include AI-generated text verbatim — or with small changes — into one’s texts without proper attribution constitutes plagiarism comparable to the use of text written by others without citing the source. If it can be established that a student has submitted work that includes a significant amount AI-generated text without proper attribution (see below), the corresponding assessment will be evaluated with the grade 5 (failed).
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-12T14:09:15Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+academic_integrity: LMU IfKW guidance says permitted AI use in assessed work, including preliminary tasks, must be completely and appropriately documented.
15+Evidence (en, a82c2400f286): The use of AI (if permitted) in assessed work, including for preliminary tasks, must be completely and appropriately documented. In addition, students should document: How the tool was used in their work (e.g., generation of stimuli, translation, summary of previous research, formulation of research questions etc), the prompt, and if required by the teacher, the original output.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-12T14:09:15Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+privacy: LMU IfKW guidance says material containing personal information must not be entered into AI systems without consent and unless German or EU data-protection standards are met.
20+Evidence (en, a82c2400f286): Material containing personal information must not be entered into AI systems without consent and unless German or EU standards of data protection are met. Providers of LLMs may reside in countries where rules of data protection do not follow the same standards as in Germany or the EU.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-12T14:09:15Z
1022 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1123 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
24+research: LMU Medical Faculty dissertation guidance says doctoral authors must disclose when, where, and to what extent AI was used, name AI as an aid in the affidavit, and mark sections where AI was used for creation or editing.
25+Evidence (de, 99c44e197380): Geben Sie an, wann, wo und in welchem Umfang Sie KI im Rahmen Ihrer Dissertation genutzt haben! In Ihrer eidesstattlichen Versicherung (Affidavit) erklären Sie, dass Sie Ihre Dissertation selbständig verfasst haben und alle verwendeten Hilfsmittel benannt haben. KI ist ein solches Hilfsmittel und muss daher benannt werden. Machen Sie Abschnitte in denen Sie KI beim Erstellen oder Editieren genutzt haben kenntlich.
26+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-12T14:09:15Z
1227 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1328 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
29+teaching: LMU teaching guidance recommends adapting e-exam questions for ChatGPT-era assessment, including tasks that require critical reflection on ChatGPT limitations rather than simple knowledge or comprehension questions.
30+Evidence (de, e572e056a5eb): Bei E-Klausuren gelten folgende Empfehlungen: Stellen Sie andere Aufgaben als vor der Einführung von ChatGPT. Sie müssen davon ausgehen, dass ChatGPT zum Einsatz kommen könnte. Es wäre deshalb sinnvoll, dass Sie Aufgaben stellen, bei denen Studierende die Limitationen von ChatGPT kritisch reflektieren müssen. Einfache Wissens- und Verständnisfragen sind unter Einsatz von KI nicht sinnvoll.
31+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-12T14:09:15Z
1432 ## Source attribution added
1533 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
34+Source https://cms-cdn.lmu.de/media/15-sw/ifkw/downloads/ai-use-for-students-ifkw-lmu-2025.pdf snapshot a82c2400f28677a71a66c6bf7b2eef43ca4e4f926f415eeef75b7ae853647cee
35+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-12T14:09:15Z
1636 ## Source attribution added
1737 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
38+Source https://cms-cdn.lmu.de/media/44-ub/universitaetsbibliothek/downloads/handreichung_ki.pdf snapshot e572e056a5eb30a5e00a7d1a90ce5d4c1b7531bfe6c198c87e0b1933d153eeba
39+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-12T14:09:15Z
1840 ## Source attribution added
1941 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
42+Source https://www.med.lmu.de/de/promotion/gwp/kuenstliche-intelligenz/ snapshot 99c44e197380c05b23bdfbfbfe10f5b8cfd3b2725483f55a8d259432cc6bdda0
43+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-12T14:09:15Z