Różnice wersji
Kingston University, London
Zjednoczona różnica trackerów dla public-release-20260523-001. Pełny tekst strony źródłowej nie jest publikowany; krótkie fragmenty dowodów w języku oryginalnym są wyświetlane dla kontekstu cytowania.
Zjednoczona różnica
Zmiany w śledzeniu między wydaniem a wydaniem generowane z publicznych migawek wydań.
Kingston University, London public-release-20260523-001 różnica
Pierwsze śledzone wydanie.
+21-0
11 # Kingston University, London AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+source_status: Kingston University's 2025/26 regulation-change summary states that AR6 and AR7 introduced a formal definition of generative AI use within types of academic misconduct, and that AG2 became standalone guidance referencing AI and non-AI editorial help.
5+Evidence (en-GB, 4fbe3423fc7b): Introduction of a formal definition of use of generative artificial intelligence articulated within our current different types for academic misconduct. This guidance was previously published as an Annex within the Academic Integrity Procedures for Taught and Research degrees (AR6 and AR7) but has been reviewed as a new standalone document which references both AI and non-AI editorial help.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-18T03:02:00.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+academic_integrity: Kingston University's 2025/26 Academic Integrity procedure says contributions by artificial intelligence tools must be properly acknowledged.
10+Evidence (en-GB, a65ad969e826): Contributions by artificial intelligence (AI) tools must also be properly acknowledged.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-18T03:00:00.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+academic_integrity: Kingston University's AG2 guidance says that if generative AI is used as part of the editorial process, the student must acknowledge that use.
15+Evidence (en-GB, c103d6c1350a): Where a Generative AI has been used as part of the editorial process, then this must be acknowledged by the student.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-18T03:00:00.000Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+ai_tool_treatment: Kingston University's AG2 editorial-help guidance covers software tools including generative AI when students use third-party help in draft or final assessment work.
20+Evidence (en-GB, c103d6c1350a): This guidance is for use when a student is considering whether to employ a third party such as a professional copy editing or proof-reading company or software tool (including generative artificial intelligence (GAI)) when producing work in draft or final version.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-18T03:00:00.000Z
1022 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1123 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
24+academic_integrity: Kingston University's 2025/26 Academic Integrity procedure defines unacceptable use of generative AI as presenting AI-generated content as one's own without proper acknowledgement, except when the assessment brief explicitly permits it.
25+Evidence (en-GB, a65ad969e826): The University defines the unacceptable use of Generative Artificial Intelligence as the act of presenting content generated by artificial intelligence tools (such as text, media, tables etc - list not exhaustive), as one's own without proper acknowledgement, except where the nature of the assessment makes this permissible and is explicitly stated in the assessment brief.
26+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-18T03:00:00.000Z
1227 ## Source attribution added
1328 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
29+Source https://assets.kingston.ac.uk/m/5a4a20081623641d/original/Policies-2025-26_Summary-of-changes-to-regulations-for-2025-26.pdf snapshot 4fbe3423fc7b9e7d6985eedcb404f69952bc1af9c2ce67ae7dd90d6a86437dcd
30+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-18T03:02:00.000Z
1431 ## Source attribution added
1532 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
33+Source https://assets.kingston.ac.uk/m/6f5bd8c88b2500bd/original/Policies-2025-2026_AG02-Guidance-on-Editorial-Help-for-Student-Assessment.pdf snapshot c103d6c1350a4d057670958f0c84b9b548a45918337408572fa1475efd0b4aaf
34+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-18T03:00:00.000Z
1635 ## Source attribution added
1736 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
37+Source https://assets.kingston.ac.uk/m/7de3ec2278ed38ed/original/Policies-2025-26_AR6_Academic-Integrity-taught-courses-2025-2026.pdf snapshot a65ad969e826de23bcb07305cb388c0ae37fd584f5404a64d9e9449cc22406f6
38+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-18T03:00:00.000Z
Jak czytać tę różnicę
Metadane wersji trackerów, a nie bezpośredni dowód czasu publikacji przez uczelnię.
Właśnie wyodrębnione twierdzenia to dodania do trackeru i niekoniecznie są nowo opublikowane przez uniwersytet. Zmiany w migawce źródła oznaczają, że ten sam URL wygenerował inną sumę kontrolną; może to być treść polityki, układ, nawigacja lub metadane.
Granica
Tylko metadane trackerów
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.