Hva denne oppdateringen av oppføringen betyr
Strukturert oversikt over oppføringer
Involverte oppføringer: 35 (31 korrigert / justert · 4 lagt til)
Behandling av AI-verktøy · Godkjente verktøy · 11 flere temaer
Ingen uavhengig gjennomgått oppsummering er tilgjengelig for denne revisjonen ennå.
Dette er et historisk registersammendrag, ikke en bekreftelse på gjeldende tillatelse eller en ny universitetsregel.
Arbeidskrav og vurdering · Involverte oppføringer: 3 (3 korrigert / justert)
Korreksjon av nettsted
Endringer i nettstedets avslutningstekst
−Gammel tekstIndividual instructors at Penn determine their own policies related to acceptable student use of generative AI in coursework.
+Ny tekstCETLI states that Penn does not have a standardized policy on student AI use: each instructor is responsible for setting guidelines, and departments or programs may offer recommendations. Instructors determine acceptable AI use in coursework and may set assignment-specific policies.
Korreksjon av nettsted
Sammenlignbar gammel og ny tekst er ikke tilgjengelig.
Gammel tekstWharton Academy permits students to use generative AI for brainstorming, learning efficiency, getting prompts, exploring different perspectives, asking for templates, getting preliminary feedback on written work, and language translation, at the discretion of faculty and instructional teams.
Ny tekstWharton Academy permits students to use generative AI for brainstorming, learning efficiency, getting prompts, exploring different perspectives, asking for templates, getting preliminary feedback on written work, and language translation, at the discretion of faculty and instructional teams.
Korreksjon av nettsted
Sammenlignbar gammel og ny tekst er ikke tilgjengelig.
Gammel tekstIn the absence of other guidance, Penn students should treat the use of AI as they would treat assistance from another person — if it is unacceptable to have another person substantially complete a task like writing an essay, it is also unacceptable to have AI complete the task.
Ny tekstIn the absence of other guidance, Penn students should treat the use of AI as they would treat assistance from another person — if it is unacceptable to have another person substantially complete a task like writing an essay, it is also unacceptable to have AI complete the task.
Eksamen · Involverte oppføringer: 1 (1 korrigert / justert)
Korreksjon av nettsted
Sammenlignbar gammel og ny tekst er ikke tilgjengelig.
Gammel tekstWharton Academy prohibits students from using AI to complete personal reflection or opinion-based tasks, from using AI to complete group assignments instead of collaborating with peers, and from using AI to cheat on exams or tests.
Ny tekstWharton Academy prohibits students from using AI to complete personal reflection or opinion-based tasks, from using AI to complete group assignments instead of collaborating with peers, and from using AI to cheat on exams or tests.
Redegjørelse · Involverte oppføringer: 3 (3 korrigert / justert)
Korreksjon av nettsted
Endringer i nettstedets avslutningstekst
−Gammel tekstPenn requires all community members (educators, staff, researchers, and students) to be transparent about the use of AI and to disclose when a work product was created wholly or partially using an AI tool.
+Ny tekstPenn's university-community generative AI guidance directs members to be transparent about AI use and disclose when a work product was created wholly or partially using AI, including how it was used when appropriate. The statement is guidance, not a final policy; instructors may set course-specific disclosure and citation requirements.
Korreksjon av nettsted
Sammenlignbar gammel og ny tekst er ikke tilgjengelig.
Gammel tekstAt Wharton Academy, AI-generated work should be cited like any other reference material, including how and where students used AI-generated information; using AI-generated work without crediting the source is considered plagiarism.
Ny tekstAt Wharton Academy, AI-generated work should be cited like any other reference material, including how and where students used AI-generated information; using AI-generated work without crediting the source is considered plagiarism.
Korreksjon av nettsted
Sammenlignbar gammel og ny tekst er ikke tilgjengelig.
Gammel tekstPenn educators should provide students with clear guidelines on the use of AI within coursework and should disclose to students when course materials have been created with AI or when AI detection software will be used.
Ny tekstPenn educators should provide students with clear guidelines on the use of AI within coursework and should disclose to students when course materials have been created with AI or when AI detection software will be used.
Datasikkerhet · Involverte oppføringer: 5 (5 korrigert / justert)
Korreksjon av nettsted
Endringer i nettstedets avslutningstekst
−Gammel tekstPenn's Office of Audit, Compliance & Privacy mandates that users of publicly available (unlicensed) AI tools must not enter any information that could identify a student, including names, ID numbers, email addresses, or detailed descriptions of student work or engagement that could be identifiable to others.
+Ny tekstCETLI reports that Penn's Office of Audit, Compliance & Privacy mandates that unlicensed AI tools must not receive information that could identify a student, including names, ID numbers, email addresses or identifiable descriptions of class work or engagement.
Korreksjon av nettsted
Endringer i nettstedets avslutningstekst
−Gammel tekstPenn mandates that student work (papers, projects) must not be entered into unlicensed AI tools without the student's permission, even if anonymized, because this work is part of the student's confidential academic record.
+Ny tekstPenn's restrictions on unlicensed AI tools prohibit entering student work without the student's permission, even if anonymized, because it is part of the student's confidential academic record.
Korreksjon av nettsted
Endringer i nettstedets avslutningstekst
−Gammel tekstInstructors must not require students to enter their own work into unlicensed AI tools or use such tools in assignments; unlicensed tools may be used optionally by students at the instructor's discretion, but Penn-licensed tools should be used for mandatory coursework components.
+Ny tekstInstructors must not require students to enter personal information or intellectual property into an unlicensed AI tool. Students may use unlicensed tools optionally at the instructor's discretion; CETLI says to consider a Penn-licensed tool for mandatory coursework components to protect student data.
Korreksjon av nettsted
Endringer i nettstedets avslutningstekst
−Gammel tekstPenn users should not input moderate or high-risk Penn data (per the Penn Data Risk Classification) or intellectual property into AI tools without careful consideration of data use policies, a protective contract, and review by Penn's Privacy Office and Office of Information Security.
+Ny tekstPenn's guidance says users should avoid sharing personal or sensitive data and should not input moderate/high-risk Penn data or intellectual property without considering the provider's data rights and a protective contract. Moderate/high-risk data involves Privacy Office review and Information Security consultation coordinated by Procurement; intellectual property involves consultation with the Penn Center for Innovation.
Korreksjon av nettsted
Sammenlignbar gammel og ny tekst er ikke tilgjengelig.
Gammel tekstIt is not permissible under HIPAA or Penn Medicine policy to share patient or research participant information with open or public AI tools and services such as ChatGPT; individual patient data and data sets (even if deidentified) may not be exposed to such tools absent institutional approval.
Ny tekstIt is not permissible under HIPAA or Penn Medicine policy to share patient or research participant information with open or public AI tools and services such as ChatGPT; individual patient data and data sets (even if deidentified) may not be exposed to such tools absent institutional approval.
Godkjente verktøy · Involverte oppføringer: 3 (3 korrigert / justert)
Korreksjon av nettsted
Endringer i nettstedets avslutningstekst
−Gammel tekstGrammarly for Education is listed for University of Pennsylvania in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
+Ny tekstGrammarly Pro is listed by CETLI with stated access and data conditions. Its availability is not coursework or examination permission.
Korreksjon av nettsted
Endringer i nettstedets avslutningstekst
−Gammel tekstPennChat (Pilot) is listed for University of Pennsylvania in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
+Ny tekstPennChat is institutionally available under its stated account, audience, cost and data conditions. This does not establish permission to use it in coursework or examinations.
Korreksjon av nettsted
Endringer i nettstedets avslutningstekst
−Gammel tekstPenn provides several licensed AI tools to its community, including Copilot Chat (Basic, free), Adobe Express (free), ChatGPT-EDU (purchase required), M365 Copilot Premium (purchase required), Gemini for Google Workspace (purchase required), Google NotebookLM (purchase required), Grammarly Pro (purchase required), Snowflake Data Analytics (purchase required), and Zoom AI Companion (free).
+Ny tekstPenn offers institutionally licensed AI tools with different eligibility, costs, account requirements and permitted data categories. CETLI directs users to the current ISC directory for access and costs; a listing does not establish coursework or examination permission.
Forskning og publisering · Involverte oppføringer: 3 (3 korrigert / justert)
Korreksjon av nettsted
Sammenlignbar gammel og ny tekst er ikke tilgjengelig.
Gammel tekstPenn researchers should obtain IRB approvals prior to exposing research participant data to AI tools and should exercise caution when research involves high-risk data including PII and health information.
Ny tekstPenn researchers should obtain IRB approvals prior to exposing research participant data to AI tools and should exercise caution when research involves high-risk data including PII and health information.
Korreksjon av nettsted
Sammenlignbar gammel og ny tekst er ikke tilgjengelig.
Gammel tekstPenn community members should avoid uploading confidential or proprietary information to AI platforms prior to seeking patent or copyright protection, as doing so could jeopardize intellectual property rights.
Ny tekstPenn community members should avoid uploading confidential or proprietary information to AI platforms prior to seeking patent or copyright protection, as doing so could jeopardize intellectual property rights.
Korreksjon av nettsted
Sammenlignbar gammel og ny tekst er ikke tilgjengelig.
Gammel tekstPenn researchers should consult with department leadership and their discipline's publishing standards to determine how AI use should be accounted for with regard to authorship in publications.
Ny tekstPenn researchers should consult with department leadership and their discipline's publishing standards to determine how AI use should be accounted for with regard to authorship in publications.
Akademisk integritet · Involverte oppføringer: 3 (2 korrigert / justert · 1 lagt til)
Korreksjon av nettsted
Endringer i nettstedets avslutningstekst
−Gammel tekstPenn's Center for Excellence in Teaching, Learning and Innovation (CETLI) instructs faculty that in all cases they should not upload student work into AI detectors, stating that uploading student work without consent violates FERPA and Penn privacy policies, and noting that AI detectors are not accurate enough to serve as evidence of misconduct due to frequent bias.
+Ny tekstCETLI tells instructors not to upload student work into an AI detector in all cases. It states that uploading without consent violates FERPA and Penn privacy policies, and that detectors are not accurate enough to be treated as evidence of misconduct because of frequent bias.
Tillegg i registreringen
Lagt til
+If instructors suspect AI use that violates their course policy, CETLI advises discussing the student's drafting and reasoning process. Instructors may consult the Center for Community Standards & Accountability, which handles academic integrity violations, whether or not they intend to refer the student for further investigation.
Korreksjon av nettsted
Sammenlignbar gammel og ny tekst er ikke tilgjengelig.
Gammel tekstWharton Academy prohibits students from directly copying answers from generative AI tools and submitting them as their own, from using AI to paraphrase or rewrite plagiarized content, and from posting AI-generated discussion posts within course community forums.
Ny tekstWharton Academy prohibits students from directly copying answers from generative AI tools and submitting them as their own, from using AI to paraphrase or rewrite plagiarized content, and from posting AI-generated discussion posts within course community forums.
Sikkerhet og innkjøp · Involverte oppføringer: 1 (1 korrigert / justert)
Korreksjon av nettsted
Sammenlignbar gammel og ny tekst er ikke tilgjengelig.
Gammel tekstUniversity business processes using AI should have oversight, review, and verification of AI outputs in place to ensure reliability, consistency, and accuracy.
Ny tekstUniversity business processes using AI should have oversight, review, and verification of AI outputs in place to ensure reliability, consistency, and accuracy.
Personvern · Involverte oppføringer: 1 (1 korrigert / justert)
Korreksjon av nettsted
Endringer i nettstedets avslutningstekst
−Gammel tekstPenn’s Center for Excellence in Teaching, Learning and Innovation (CETLI) maintains updated institutional guidance on Penn-licensed AI tools, providing community access to PennChat (with free daily token allotments for FERPA-protected educational records and HIPAA-protected health information via PennKey while on campus or VPN), alongside Anthropic Enterprise (Claude), Articulate AI Assistant, Adobe Express, and Copilot Chat, while mandating that instructors must not require students to enter personal information or intellectual property into unlicensed tools.
+Ny tekstCETLI lists PennChat as free for the Penn community, with FERPA-protected educational records and HIPAA-protected health information listed as acceptable data uses, accessed with PennKey on campus or VPN. Other licensed tools have their own data and access conditions; instructors must not require personal information or intellectual property in unlicensed tools.
Behandling av AI-verktøy · Involverte oppføringer: 10 (7 korrigert / justert · 3 lagt til)
Tillegg i registreringen
Lagt til
+Adobe Firefly is listed by CETLI with stated access and data conditions. Its availability is not coursework or examination permission.
Korreksjon av nettsted
Endringer i nettstedets avslutningstekst
−Gammel tekstChatGPT Edu is listed for University of Pennsylvania in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
+Ny tekstChatGPT Edu is institutionally available under its stated account, audience, cost and data conditions. This does not establish permission to use it in coursework or examinations.
Korreksjon av nettsted
Endringer i nettstedets avslutningstekst
−Gammel tekstClaude Anthropic is listed for University of Pennsylvania in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
+Ny tekstClaude Anthropic is institutionally available under its stated account, audience, cost and data conditions. This does not establish permission to use it in coursework or examinations.
Korreksjon av nettsted
Endringer i nettstedets avslutningstekst
−Gammel tekstGemini for Google Workspace is listed for University of Pennsylvania in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
+Ny tekstGemini for Google Workspace is institutionally available under its stated account, audience, cost and data conditions. This does not establish permission to use it in coursework or examinations.
Korreksjon av nettsted
Endringer i nettstedets avslutningstekst
−Gammel tekstSnowflake Data Analytics Platform & Consulting is listed for University of Pennsylvania in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
+Ny tekstSnowflake Data Analytics Platform & Consulting is institutionally available under its stated account, audience, cost and data conditions. This does not establish permission to use it in coursework or examinations.
Korreksjon av nettsted
Endringer i nettstedets avslutningstekst
−Gammel tekstMicrosoft Copilot Chat (Basic) is listed for University of Pennsylvania in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
+Ny tekstMicrosoft Copilot Chat (Basic) is institutionally available under its stated account, audience, cost and data conditions. This does not establish permission to use it in coursework or examinations.
Korreksjon av nettsted
Endringer i nettstedets avslutningstekst
−Gammel tekstMicrosoft M365 Copilot (Premium) is listed for University of Pennsylvania in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
+Ny tekstMicrosoft M365 Copilot (Premium) is institutionally available under its stated account, audience, cost and data conditions. This does not establish permission to use it in coursework or examinations.
Korreksjon av nettsted
Endringer i nettstedets avslutningstekst
−Gammel tekstGoogle NotebookLM is listed for University of Pennsylvania in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
+Ny tekstGoogle Gemini Notebook is institutionally available under its stated account, audience, cost and data conditions. This does not establish permission to use it in coursework or examinations.
Tillegg i registreringen
Lagt til
+OpenEvidence is listed by CETLI with stated access and data conditions. Its availability is not coursework or examination permission.
Tillegg i registreringen
Lagt til
+Zoom AI Companion is listed by CETLI with stated access and data conditions. Its availability is not coursework or examination permission.
Kildestatus · Involverte oppføringer: 1 (1 korrigert / justert)
Korreksjon av nettsted
Endringer i nettstedets avslutningstekst
−Gammel tekstPenn's CETLI generative AI guidance page was updated from referring to 'Penn AI Guidance and Policies' to 'Penn AI Tools and Policies', adding that Penn offers access to AI tools and provides policies to help instructors and staff determine which tools are acceptable for different types of student data.
+Ny tekstCETLI's Generative AI & Your Teaching overview links to Penn AI Tools & Policies for the changing institutional tool list and access instructions. Tool access is separate from instructors' course policies.
Andre oppføringer · Involverte oppføringer: 1 (1 korrigert / justert)
Korreksjon av nettsted
Sammenlignbar gammel og ny tekst er ikke tilgjengelig.
Gammel tekstUsers of AI at Penn are accountable for AI-generated content and should validate its accuracy with trusted first-party sources, being wary of misinformation or hallucinations.
Ny tekstUsers of AI at Penn are accountable for AI-generated content and should validate its accuracy with trusted first-party sources, being wary of misinformation or hallucinations.
Offisielle kilder · Kildesjekk
Kildesjekk
Sammenlignbar gammel og ny tekst er ikke tilgjengelig.
Kildesjekk
Sammenlignbar gammel og ny tekst er ikke tilgjengelig.
Kildesjekk
Sammenlignbar gammel og ny tekst er ikke tilgjengelig.
Kildesjekk
Sammenlignbar gammel og ny tekst er ikke tilgjengelig.
Kildesjekk
Sammenlignbar gammel og ny tekst er ikke tilgjengelig.
Kildesjekk
Sammenlignbar gammel og ny tekst er ikke tilgjengelig.
Kildesjekk
Sammenlignbar gammel og ny tekst er ikke tilgjengelig.
Kildesjekk
Sammenlignbar gammel og ny tekst er ikke tilgjengelig.