Diferencias de la versión
King's College London
Diferencia del seguimiento unificado para public-release-20260523-001. El texto completo de la página fuente no se publica; se muestran fragmentos cortos de pruebas en el idioma original para el contexto de la cita.
Diferencia unificada
Cambios en el seguimiento de versión a versión generados desde instantáneas públicas de lanzamientos.
King's College London public-release-20260523-001 diferencias
Lanzamiento inicial con seguimiento.
+48-0
11 # King's College London AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+ai_tool_treatment: King's College London does not ban the use of generative AI tools by students.
5+Evidence (en, de7e5bc7b74c): No, King's does not ban the use of any type of AI. It is increasingly part of the wider world and is changing the nature of many aspects of life including the jobs you are in or will progress into.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-10T12:00:00Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+academic_integrity: At King's College London, inappropriate use of generative AI without attribution is considered academic misconduct and can result in penalties ranging from formal warnings to expulsion.
10+Evidence (en, de7e5bc7b74c): Inappropriate use without attribution is considered academic misconduct. For further details please see the Academic Misconduct Policy and Academic Misconduct Procedure. Potential penalties can range from formal warnings, resubmitting the coursework, suspension or expulsion.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-10T12:00:00Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+academic_integrity: King's College London does not require students to reference generative AI as an authoritative source in the reference list, but does require explicit acknowledgement of AI tool use in coursework.
15+Evidence (en, de7e5bc7b74c): King's College London, unlike some other universities, does not require students to reference generative AI as an authoritative source in the reference list for much the same reason you would not be expected to cite a search engine, a student essay website or be over-dependent on synoptic, secondary source material. However, as we learn more about the capabilities and limitations of these tools and as we work together to evolve our own critical AI literacies, we do expect you to be explicit in acknowledging your use of generative AI tools such as Microsoft Copilot (available via your KCL account), Google Gemini, ChatGPT or any other media generated through other generative AI tools.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-10T12:00:00Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+academic_integrity: At King's College London, submitting AI-generated text as one's own without written departmental permission is considered misconduct under third-party involvement or text manipulation offences.
20+Evidence (en, c022dc2cd781): Submitting text generated by technology/artificial intelligence as their own, without written permission from their department is considered misconduct under the offences of third-party involvement or text manipulation, if it provides undue advantage or interferes with assessment of the student's own understanding.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-10T12:00:00Z
1022 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1123 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
24+academic_integrity: King's College London has disabled the AI detection feature in Turnitin due to concerns about reliability and false positives.
25+Evidence (en, c022dc2cd781): King's took the decision not to enable the AI detection % in Turnitin due to concerns about its reliability and potential for false positives. As things stand AI detection is not an option that is available to us.
26+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-10T12:00:00Z
1227 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1328 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
29+teaching: King's College London supports considered use of generative AI and is open to evolving teaching, assessment and feedback practices according to need and disciplinary differences.
30+Evidence (en, e83b1023c70f): King's College London supports considered use of generative AI, and is open to evolving teaching, assessment and feedback practices according to need and disciplinary differences.
31+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-10T12:00:00Z
1432 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1533 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
34+ai_tool_treatment: Microsoft Copilot is available to all King's College London students via their KCL Microsoft account and comes with commercial data protection under the university's enterprise license.
35+Evidence (en, e83b1023c70f): Our Enterprise license means that use of Copilot comes with commercial data protection and is therefore a more secure alternative to other generative AI tools.
36+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-10T12:00:00Z
1637 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1738 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
39+teaching: King's College London subscribes to the Russell Group's five principles on generative AI in education, including supporting AI literacy, adapting teaching and assessment, and ensuring academic integrity.
40+Evidence (en, c022dc2cd781): King's contributed to and subscribes to the Russell Group's five principles on the use of generative AI tools in education: Universities will support students and staff to become AI-literate; Staff should be equipped to support students to use generative AI tools effectively and appropriately in their learning experience; Universities will adapt teaching and assessment to incorporate the ethical use of generative AI and support equal access; Universities will ensure academic rigour and integrity is upheld; Universities will work collaboratively to share best practice as the technology and its application in education evolves.
41+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-10T12:00:00Z
1842 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1943 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
44+research: King's College London permits doctoral students to use generative AI tools in their thesis writing processes for assistive purposes such as clarifying writing, provided use is declared and consistent with guidance.
45+Evidence (en, 7a1dd2b317bc): Yes, students are permitted to make use of generative AI tools in their thesis writing processes. However, where a student's use of generative AI tools in their thesis writing exceeds the circumstances permitted by this guidance, they will risk breaching the Academic Misconduct Policy.
46+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-10T12:00:00Z
2047 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
2148 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
49+research: King's College London doctoral examiners must not upload any part of a student's thesis into a generative AI tool or use external AI detection software when assessing the thesis.
50+Evidence (en, 7a1dd2b317bc): Must not upload any part of a student's thesis into a generative AI tool, or make use of external generative AI detection software when assessing the thesis.
51+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-10T12:00:00Z
2252 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
2353 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
54+teaching: King's College London defines four broad levels of acceptable AI use in assessments: minimal, limited/selective, open, and embedded, with programme and module leaders adjusting to assessment specifics.
55+Evidence (en, de7e5bc7b74c): We have suggested four broad levels that your Programme and Module leaders may adjust to the specifics of an assessment: 1. Minimal - Includes routine and established use of tools such as auto transcription, spell checkers, grammar check. 2. Limited/selective - Use for clearly delineated tasks as appropriate/allowed/recommended. 3. Open - No specific restrictions but with requirement to track key stages/tools utilised. 4. Embedded - AI use is a feature of the assessment itself.
56+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-10T12:00:00Z
2457 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
2558 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
59+ai_tool_treatment: Microsoft Copilot is the primary institutional generative AI tool available to all King's College London students and staff via KCL Microsoft login credentials.
60+Evidence (en, de7e5bc7b74c): Please note that Microsoft Copilot is available to all King's students with your KCL Microsoft log in credentials. Make sure you are logged into your KCL account and switch 'safe search' to 'moderate' to use it.
61+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-10T12:00:00Z
2662 ## Source attribution added
2763 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
64+Source https://www.kcl.ac.uk/about/strategy/learning-and-teaching/ai-guidance snapshot c0ada5d482ee2a50bb512d224af5466e01a1dec5ea25c9c29eaf0595701903f4
65+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-10T12:00:00Z
2866 ## Source attribution added
2967 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
68+Source https://www.kcl.ac.uk/about/strategy/learning-and-teaching/ai-guidance/context-definitions snapshot e83b1023c70fd9113f0fafdecb9f0ee84991617be4a6e17182b9fdf753d682f0
69+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-10T12:00:00Z
3070 ## Source attribution added
3171 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
72+Source https://www.kcl.ac.uk/about/strategy/learning-and-teaching/ai-guidance/doctoral-assessment snapshot 7a1dd2b317bc654cd4834c6dcd738cf2b2f1334c0d29a89e641af8466c836601
73+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-10T12:00:00Z
3274 ## Source attribution added
3375 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
76+Source https://www.kcl.ac.uk/about/strategy/learning-and-teaching/ai-guidance/macro-level snapshot c022dc2cd7815838554df90233c3d5181735692c730cacaecd2df7774858f9ca
77+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-10T12:00:00Z
3478 ## Source attribution added
3579 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
80+Source https://www.kcl.ac.uk/about/strategy/learning-and-teaching/ai-guidance/student-guidance snapshot de7e5bc7b74c4cb2793a5aa5fa10833903a495498accbd3da32eaac9e5f4cc23
81+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-10T12:00:00Z
3682 ## Source attribution added
3783 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
84+Source https://www.kcl.ac.uk/policyhub/academic-misconduct-policy snapshot ca31369ed62b0ce39c01540706acae763cb47de2a08ac86207ddd702f64fea80
85+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-10T12:00:00Z
Cómo leer esta diferencia
Metadatos de la versión del rastreador, no prueba directa del momento de publicación universitaria.
Las afirmaciones extraídas recientemente son adiciones al seguimiento y no necesariamente han sido publicadas por la universidad. Los cambios en las instantáneas de origen significan que la misma URL produjo un hash diferente; esto puede deberse al texto de la política, el diseño, la navegación o los metadatos.
Límite
Solo metadatos del rastreador
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.