The AI Declaration must be submitted with all assessments submitted to, or completed on, Moodle, including those where no AI use is permitted by the Assessment Brief.
Birkbeck's student AI guidance states that the AI Declaration must be submitted with all assessments submitted to, or completed on, Moodle, including assessments where the brief permits no AI use.
You should only use AI tools, including generative AI, to the extent that has been outlined in the assessment brief. Some assessments will permit the use of AI tools for some aspects of your work, while others will not permit any use of AI tools at all.
Birkbeck's student AI guidance says students should use AI tools, including generative AI, only to the extent outlined in the assessment brief, and should not use them where the brief explicitly does not permit them.
You should retain evidence of your use of AI tools including generative AI. This could be in the form of transcripts or screenshots of prompts and outputs.
Birkbeck's student AI guidance says students should retain evidence of their use of AI tools, such as transcripts or screenshots of prompts and outputs, because it may be requested if work is flagged for possible academic misconduct.
This might include using generative artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT to create content and/or argument for your assessment which you then present as your own intellectual work. If you are permitted to use generative AI tools to create content, this will be included in the assessment brief with guidance.
Birkbeck's Academic Integrity and Misconduct policy includes using generative AI tools such as ChatGPT to create assessment content or argument presented as the student's own intellectual work within its description of contract cheating, unless generative AI use is permitted in the assessment brief with guidance.
Birkbeck is still working on its approach to institutional tools. AI use cases that do not require ethical approval include document summaries and synthesis using the researcher's Birkbeck MS 365 account (e.g. MS Copilot, MS Word).
Microsoft Copilot in Birkbeck Microsoft 365 is listed for Birkbeck, University of London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
The AI Declaration must be submitted with all assessments submitted to, or completed on, Moodle, including those where no AI use is permitted by the Assessment Brief.
Birkbeck's student AI guidance states that the AI Declaration must be submitted with all assessments submitted to, or completed on, Moodle, including assessments where the brief permits no AI use.
You should only use AI tools, including generative AI, to the extent that has been outlined in the assessment brief. Some assessments will permit the use of AI tools for some aspects of your work, while others will not permit any use of AI tools at all.
Birkbeck's student AI guidance says students should use AI tools, including generative AI, only to the extent outlined in the assessment brief, and should not use them where the brief explicitly does not permit them.
You should retain evidence of your use of AI tools including generative AI. This could be in the form of transcripts or screenshots of prompts and outputs.
Birkbeck's student AI guidance says students should retain evidence of their use of AI tools, such as transcripts or screenshots of prompts and outputs, because it may be requested if work is flagged for possible academic misconduct.
This might include using generative artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT to create content and/or argument for your assessment which you then present as your own intellectual work. If you are permitted to use generative AI tools to create content, this will be included in the assessment brief with guidance.
Birkbeck's Academic Integrity and Misconduct policy includes using generative AI tools such as ChatGPT to create assessment content or argument presented as the student's own intellectual work within its description of contract cheating, unless generative AI use is permitted in the assessment brief with guidance.
Birkbeck is still working on its approach to institutional tools. AI use cases that do not require ethical approval include document summaries and synthesis using the researcher's Birkbeck MS 365 account (e.g. MS Copilot, MS Word).
Microsoft Copilot in Birkbeck Microsoft 365 is listed for Birkbeck, University of London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
The AI Declaration must be submitted with all assessments submitted to, or completed on, Moodle, including those where no AI use is permitted by the Assessment Brief.
Birkbeck's student AI guidance states that the AI Declaration must be submitted with all assessments submitted to, or completed on, Moodle, including assessments where the brief permits no AI use.
Birkbeck is still working on its approach to institutional tools. AI use cases that do not require ethical approval include document summaries and synthesis using the researcher's Birkbeck MS 365 account (e.g. MS Copilot, MS Word).
Microsoft Copilot in Birkbeck Microsoft 365 is listed for Birkbeck, University of London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
You should only use AI tools, including generative AI, to the extent that has been outlined in the assessment brief. Some assessments will permit the use of AI tools for some aspects of your work, while others will not permit any use of AI tools at all.
Birkbeck's student AI guidance says students should use AI tools, including generative AI, only to the extent outlined in the assessment brief, and should not use them where the brief explicitly does not permit them.
Birkbeck is still working on its approach to institutional tools. AI use cases that do not require ethical approval include document summaries and synthesis using the researcher's Birkbeck MS 365 account (e.g. MS Copilot, MS Word).
Microsoft Copilot in Birkbeck Microsoft 365 is listed for Birkbeck, University of London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
The AI Declaration must be submitted with all assessments submitted to, or completed on, Moodle, including those where no AI use is permitted by the Assessment Brief.
Birkbeck's student AI guidance states that the AI Declaration must be submitted with all assessments submitted to, or completed on, Moodle, including assessments where the brief permits no AI use.
You should retain evidence of your use of AI tools including generative AI. This could be in the form of transcripts or screenshots of prompts and outputs.
Birkbeck's student AI guidance says students should retain evidence of their use of AI tools, such as transcripts or screenshots of prompts and outputs, because it may be requested if work is flagged for possible academic misconduct.
This might include using generative artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT to create content and/or argument for your assessment which you then present as your own intellectual work. If you are permitted to use generative AI tools to create content, this will be included in the assessment brief with guidance.
Birkbeck's Academic Integrity and Misconduct policy includes using generative AI tools such as ChatGPT to create assessment content or argument presented as the student's own intellectual work within its description of contract cheating, unless generative AI use is permitted in the assessment brief with guidance.
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
Teaching guidanceBirkbeck, University of London
Not mentioned in reviewed sources
Status & scope
Scope stated in the cited claims
Original official evidence
No reviewed evidence is included for this topic. This does not establish that no rule exists.
Security and procurement
Not mentioned in reviewed sources
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
Security and procurementBirkbeck, University of London
Not mentioned in reviewed sources
Status & scope
Scope stated in the cited claims
Original official evidence
No reviewed evidence is included for this topic. This does not establish that no rule exists.
Record updatesLast 90 days
Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.
Update records are not available for this page yet.
Reviewed record
Reviewed claims
5 reviewed claims
Academic Integrity 3 reviewed claims
Academic Integrity
Birkbeck's student AI guidance states that the AI Declaration must be submitted with all assessments submitted to, or completed on, Moodle, including assessments where the brief permits no AI use.
The AI Declaration must be submitted with all assessments submitted to, or completed on, Moodle, including those where no AI use is permitted by the Assessment Brief.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
d6f6bbed…
Retrieved
May 16, 2026
Evidence locator
Section 5.2
Academic Integrity
Birkbeck's student AI guidance says students should retain evidence of their use of AI tools, such as transcripts or screenshots of prompts and outputs, because it may be requested if work is flagged for possible academic misconduct.
You should retain evidence of your use of AI tools including generative AI. This could be in the form of transcripts or screenshots of prompts and outputs.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
d6f6bbed…
Retrieved
May 16, 2026
Evidence locator
Section 6.1
Academic Integrity
Birkbeck's Academic Integrity and Misconduct policy includes using generative AI tools such as ChatGPT to create assessment content or argument presented as the student's own intellectual work within its description of contract cheating, unless generative AI use is permitted in the assessment brief with guidance.
This might include using generative artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT to create content and/or argument for your assessment which you then present as your own intellectual work. If you are permitted to use generative AI tools to create content, this will be included in the assessment brief with guidance.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
1a7ec093…
Retrieved
May 16, 2026
Evidence locator
Academic misconduct examples, contract cheating
AI tool use 2 reviewed claims
Ai Tool Treatment
Microsoft Copilot in Birkbeck Microsoft 365 is listed for Birkbeck, University of London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%
Normalized value: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot in Birkbeck Microsoft 365","description":"Birkbeck's research-ethics procedures identify document summaries and synthesis using a researcher's Birkbeck Microsoft 365 account (for example, Microsoft Copilot) as a use case not requiring ethical approval. The policy also states that its approach to institutional tools is still being developed.","howToObtain":"Use through a researcher's Birkbeck Microsoft 365 account only within the policy's stated research conditions; confirm any data and ethics requirements before use.","costToUser":"Not specified.","availability":"conditionally_allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}
Last checked
Jul 16, 2026
Last changed
Jul 16, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
Birkbeck is still working on its approach to institutional tools. AI use cases that do not require ethical approval include document summaries and synthesis using the researcher's Birkbeck MS 365 account (e.g. MS Copilot, MS Word).
Localized display only
Birkbeck is still working on its approach to institutional tools. AI use cases that do not require ethical approval include document summaries and synthesis using the researcher's Birkbeck MS 365 account (e.g. MS Copilot, MS Word).
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
68e4ffdc…
Retrieved
Jul 16, 2026
Ai Tool Treatment
Birkbeck's student AI guidance says students should use AI tools, including generative AI, only to the extent outlined in the assessment brief, and should not use them where the brief explicitly does not permit them.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%
Normalized value: assessment_brief_scoped_ai_use
Last checked
May 16, 2026
Last changed
May 16, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
You should only use AI tools, including generative AI, to the extent that has been outlined in the assessment brief. Some assessments will permit the use of AI tools for some aspects of your work, while others will not permit any use of AI tools at all.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
d6f6bbed…
Retrieved
May 16, 2026
Evidence locator
Section 3.2
Source record
Official sources
3 sources
3 official URLs; 3 source attributions and their captured versions retained.
Academic Integrity and Misconduct (AIM) Policy and Procedures
www.bbk.ac.uk
University official source
bbk.ac.uk
Hash and captured version
Academic Integrity and Misconduct (AIM) Policy and Procedures · 2026-05-16T18:36:21Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Birkbeck, University of London AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/birkbeck-university-of-london
Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.
Saved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.
Questions students ask
Questions students ask
Can I use AI for my coursework?
Birkbeck, University of London has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
