Change log

University of Geneva

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Geneva currently has 10 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 14, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

University of Geneva current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+20-0
11 # University of Geneva AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: UNIGE says students and staff are personally responsible for their use of generative AI and for final validation of work or decisions generated or assisted by generative AI.
3+Evidence (en, 9c8ccc809d05): UNIGE students and staff are personally responsible for their use of generative AI. The final validation of each text, image, video or other work or decision generated or assisted by a generative AI tool is the responsibility of the user.
4+privacy: UNIGE's generative AI principles require respecting applicable laws and paying particular attention to data protection, intellectual property, official secrecy, and confidentiality.
5+Evidence (en, 9c8ccc809d05): Applicable laws must be respected, as well as any specific contractual clauses (i.e. publishing contracts). Particular attention must be paid to data protection, copyright/intellectual property, official secrecy and confidentiality.
6+privacy: Within UNIGE's Faculty of Science, sensitive data such as personal data must not be disclosed to a public AI tool that does not guarantee confidentiality.
7+Evidence (en, 49b0945b02a6): Sensitive data, such as personal data, must not be disclosed to a public artificial intelligence tool that does not guarantee confidentiality.
8+ai_tool_treatment: UNIGE states that it supports the development and use of artificial intelligence and uses generative AI where it represents an opportunity in research, teaching, learning, or administration.
9+Evidence (en, 9c8ccc809d05): The University of Geneva (UNIGE) supports the development and use of artificial intelligence (AI). Within the University, generative AI is used wherever it represents an opportunity, whether in research, teaching, learning or administration.
10+academic_integrity: Within UNIGE's Faculty of Science, a formal declaration of generative AI use is required for all bachelor's, master's, or doctoral work and for academic assessment or production leading to a degree or official title.
11+Evidence (en, 49b0945b02a6): In all cases, a formal declaration of GAI use is required for all bachelor's, master's, or doctoral work, as well as for any academic assessment or production leading to the award of a degree or official title.
12+teaching: UNIGE states that faculties and interfaculty centers decide how AI is integrated into teaching and set specific conditions for using generative AI tools in research, teaching, and learning activities.
13+Evidence (en, 9c8ccc809d05): It is up to faculties and interfaculty centers to decide how AI is to be integrated into their teaching activities, and to draw up specific conditions for the use of generative AI tools for research, teaching and learning activities.
14+academic_integrity: UNIGE formally expects full transparency about AI tool use in academic work through appropriate citation rules, with possible description of the methodology used with AI support.
15+Evidence (en, 0dc575fd8e25): Full transparency regarding the use of AI tools in academic work is formally expected through appropriate use of citation rules. These can be accompanied by a description of the methodology used to carry out the work with the support of the AI tool.
16+teaching: Within UNIGE's Faculty of Science, teachers are free to allow or prohibit AI use in courses and assessed assignments, and must define the framework and referencing requirements when generative AI is permitted.
17+Evidence (en, 37e3ca72aa1b): Teachers are free to allow or prohibit the use of artificial intelligence in their courses and for assignments given for assessment purposes. When the use of GAI is permitted, teachers must define the framework for its use, indicate the referencing requirements, and, where applicable, require that prompts be saved and submitted.
18+teaching: UNIGE guidance says academic work and learning assessment must include clear instructions about whether students may use generative AI tools, and that use of those tools must be supervised.
19+Evidence (en, 0dc575fd8e25): The completion of academic work (homework, essays, reports, etc.) and the assessment of learning (exams, continuous assessment, dissertations, etc.) must be accompanied by clear instructions regarding the possibility of students using generative AI tools. Their use must be supervised.
20+privacy: UNIGE's Digital University practical guide warns that content submitted to generative AI may be accessible to the tool owner or exposed in a data breach, so users need to understand what can and cannot be shared.
21+Evidence (en, 0515cc1b5861): Any content submitted to a generative AI tool may be accessed by the personnel of the owning company, or even more in the event of a data breach. It is therefore crucial to understand what can and cannot be shared with AI.

Claim changes

10 claim records

academic_integrity

UNIGE says students and staff are personally responsible for their use of generative AI and for final validation of work or decisions generated or assisted by generative AI.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

UNIGE's generative AI principles require respecting applicable laws and paying particular attention to data protection, intellectual property, official secrecy, and confidentiality.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

Within UNIGE's Faculty of Science, sensitive data such as personal data must not be disclosed to a public AI tool that does not guarantee confidentiality.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

UNIGE states that it supports the development and use of artificial intelligence and uses generative AI where it represents an opportunity in research, teaching, learning, or administration.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Within UNIGE's Faculty of Science, a formal declaration of generative AI use is required for all bachelor's, master's, or doctoral work and for academic assessment or production leading to a degree or official title.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

UNIGE states that faculties and interfaculty centers decide how AI is integrated into teaching and set specific conditions for using generative AI tools in research, teaching, and learning activities.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

UNIGE formally expects full transparency about AI tool use in academic work through appropriate citation rules, with possible description of the methodology used with AI support.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

Within UNIGE's Faculty of Science, teachers are free to allow or prohibit AI use in courses and assessed assignments, and must define the framework and referencing requirements when generative AI is permitted.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

UNIGE guidance says academic work and learning assessment must include clear instructions about whether students may use generative AI tools, and that use of those tools must be supervised.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

UNIGE's Digital University practical guide warns that content submitted to generative AI may be accessible to the tool owner or exposed in a data breach, so users need to understand what can and cannot be shared.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

5 source attributions