Change log

Nagoya University

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Nagoya University currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 14, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

Nagoya University current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+10-0
11 # Nagoya University AI policy record
2+privacy: Nagoya University states that students must not enter personal information or other confidential information into generative AI because information entered as prompts may leak.
3+Evidence (ja, 5143e6f89ee1): 利用の際に質問として入力した情報は流出する危険があるので、個人情報など秘密とすべき情報を絶対に入力してはいけません。
4+academic_integrity: Nagoya University tells students to use AI output only as a reference for their own writing and not to use output unchanged, even in part; penalties may be imposed in such cases.
5+Evidence (ja, 5143e6f89ee1): AIの出力情報は、あくまでも自身の文書作成の参考に留めるべきです。出力情報の一部であっても、そのまま利用することはやめてください。なお、その場合にはペナルティを課すことがあります。
6+academic_integrity: Nagoya University asks students to follow the instructions of the instructor in charge when using generative AI in classes.
7+Evidence (ja, 5143e6f89ee1): 本学における生成AIへの見解については、「教育研究における生成系人工知能技術(生成AI)の利活用について」に示されているとおりですが、学生の皆さんには、特に以下のことをお願いします。このようなAIの利用が自身の学習に与える効果や弊害について考え、ひとえに皆さん自身の学習を深めるという観点から向き合ってください。なお、授業における生成AIの利用については、担当教員の指示に従ってください。
8+ai_tool_treatment: Nagoya University says it should engage with and make positive use of generative AI as a responsible education and research institution, while confirming the technology’s benefits and problems for appropriate use.
9+Evidence (ja, cc78f82cd357): 名古屋大学は責任ある教育研究機関として、生成AIと向き合い前向きに利活用すべきであると考えます。但し、生成AIの利点と問題点とを改めて確認し、この技術を適切に利活用することが将来的な一層の飛躍に繋がると考えます。
10+research: For research activities, Nagoya University asks users to understand generative AI risks, consider use while avoiding research misconduct, and coordinate treatment with partner institutions where possible in joint research or industry-academia collaboration.
11+Evidence (ja, cc78f82cd357): これらの問題点をよく理解したうえで、研究不正を生じさせないように配慮しつつ研究活動の効率化と質の向上に生成AIの利用を検討してください。共同研究や産学連携活動に生成AIを利用する場合には、可能であれば連携機関も含めて統一的に対応するように留意してください。

Claim changes

5 claim records

privacy

Nagoya University states that students must not enter personal information or other confidential information into generative AI because information entered as prompts may leak.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%Evidence1Languagesja

academic_integrity

Nagoya University tells students to use AI output only as a reference for their own writing and not to use output unchanged, even in part; penalties may be imposed in such cases.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesja

academic_integrity

Nagoya University asks students to follow the instructions of the instructor in charge when using generative AI in classes.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesja

ai_tool_treatment

Nagoya University says it should engage with and make positive use of generative AI as a responsible education and research institution, while confirming the technology’s benefits and problems for appropriate use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesja

research

For research activities, Nagoya University asks users to understand generative AI risks, consider use while avoiding research misconduct, and coordinate treatment with partner institutions where possible in joint research or industry-academia collaboration.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesja

Source snapshots

2 source attributions