academic_integrity
Korea University states that submitting AI-generated content as one’s own, or using it without permission, is academic misconduct.
Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.
Change log
Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.
Current public record freshness and review state.
Korea University currently has 12 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 12, 2026.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.
Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.
12 claim records
Korea University states that submitting AI-generated content as one’s own, or using it without permission, is academic misconduct.
Korea University states that its AI guideline primarily applies to generative AI used directly in teaching and learning, while its basic principles also apply to educational use of all AI tools.
Korea University says AI-detection and plagiarism-prevention tools should be used only as supplementary references and not as the sole basis for misconduct findings.
Korea University tells instructors not to enter personal information, academic records, assessment questions, or other sensitive or non-public materials into AI tools, with special caution for external AI services.
Korea University tells learners to disclose the AI tool name, timing, and scope of use, distinguish their own work from AI contributions, and cite AI-generated content according to the required format.
Korea University University College Distance Learning Center distributed 2026 AI utilization guidelines and a guidebook to support responsible and effective AI use in teaching and learning.
Korea University instructs instructors to decide course AI-use policies based on course purpose, teaching method, and assignment nature, and to state the policy in the syllabus.
Korea University tells learners to check each course’s AI-use guideline before coursework and ask the instructor if permission is unclear.
Korea University tells learners not to enter personal information, non-public learning materials, or assessment questions into external AI tools, and to remember that AI inputs may be stored or reused.
Korea University frames AI as a tool that assists education and learning, with human thought and judgment remaining central.
Korea University says instructors should explain AI-use policies at the first class and notify learners that violations may be treated as academic integrity breaches.
Korea University recommends designing assignments and assessments to show learners’ critical thinking, creativity, problem-solving process, and their own reasoning even when AI is used.
3 source attributions
official_guidance checked May 12, 2026
official_guidance checked May 12, 2026
official_guidance checked May 12, 2026