Change log

Korea University

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Korea University currently has 12 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 12, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

Korea University current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+20-0
11 # Korea University AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Korea University states that submitting AI-generated content as one’s own, or using it without permission, is academic misconduct.
3+Evidence (ko, 38c07b61afe8): AI는 교육 목적과 원칙에 따라 활용해야 하며, 결과물은 사용자의 고유한 사고와 표현을 반영해야 한다. AI가 생성한 콘텐츠를 자신의 것으로 속여 제출하거나 허가 없이 사용하는 행위는 학문적 부정행위에 해당한다.
4+ai_tool_treatment: Korea University states that its AI guideline primarily applies to generative AI used directly in teaching and learning, while its basic principles also apply to educational use of all AI tools.
5+Evidence (ko, 38c07b61afe8): AI는 크게 분석형 AI(Analytical AI)와 생성형 AI(Generative AI)로 구분되며, 본 가이드라인은 텍스트·이미지·코드 생성 등 교수·학습 과정에서 직접적으로 활용되는 생성형 AI를 주된 적용 대상으로 한다. 단, 분석형 AI를 포함한 모든 AI 도구의 교육적 활용에도 본 가이드라인의 기본 원칙이 적용된다.
6+academic_integrity: Korea University says AI-detection and plagiarism-prevention tools should be used only as supplementary references and not as the sole basis for misconduct findings.
7+Evidence (ko, 38c07b61afe8): AI 탐지 도구나 표절 방지 프로그램은 오탐지 가능성과 판별의 한계가 있으므로, 단독 판단의 근거가 아닌 참고자료로만 활용한다. 탐지 도구의 사용 목적, 적용 범위, 한계를 학습자에게 사전에 안내하고, 탐지 결과만으로 부정행위를 판단하지 않는다.
8+privacy: Korea University tells instructors not to enter personal information, academic records, assessment questions, or other sensitive or non-public materials into AI tools, with special caution for external AI services.
9+Evidence (ko, 38c07b61afe8): 개인정보, 학적 정보, 평가 문항 등 민감하거나 비공개로 분류되는 자료는 AI 도구에 입력하지 않으며, 외부 AI 서비스 이용 시 데이터 저장·재활용 가능성에 특히 주의한다.
10+academic_integrity: Korea University tells learners to disclose the AI tool name, timing, and scope of use, distinguish their own work from AI contributions, and cite AI-generated content according to the required format.
11+Evidence (ko, 38c07b61afe8): AI 도구를 활용한 경우, 사용한 AI 도구명, 활용 시점, 활용 범위를 명시하고, 자신의 작성 내용과 AI의 기여 내용을 명확히 구분한다. AI가 생성한 내용을 활용할 때는 정해진 인용 방식에 따라 출처를 표기한다.
12+source_status: Korea University University College Distance Learning Center distributed 2026 AI utilization guidelines and a guidebook to support responsible and effective AI use in teaching and learning.
13+Evidence (ko, 8860c983ba86): 고려대학교 학부대학 원격교육센터에서는 교수·학습 현장에서 인공지능(AI)을 책임 있고 효과적으로 활용할 수 있도록 「2026 AI 활용 가이드라인」과 「2026 AI 활용 가이드북」을 제작·배포하였습니다.
14+teaching: Korea University instructs instructors to decide course AI-use policies based on course purpose, teaching method, and assignment nature, and to state the policy in the syllabus.
15+Evidence (ko, 38c07b61afe8): 교수자는 수업 목적, 교수 방법, 과제의 성격 등을 종합적으로 고려하여 AI 활용 방침을 자율적으로 결정하고, 강의계획안에 이를 명시하여 학습자가 언제, 어떤 방식으로 AI를 사용할 수 있는지 사전에 안내한다.
16+ai_tool_treatment: Korea University tells learners to check each course’s AI-use guideline before coursework and ask the instructor if permission is unclear.
17+Evidence (ko, 38c07b61afe8): AI 도구의 활용 가능 여부와 범위는 교과목의 성격과 수업 목표에 따라 달라질 수 있으므로, 수강 전 해당 교과목의 AI 활용 지침을 반드시 확인하고, 정해진 범위 내에서 책임 있게 활용한다. AI 활용 가능 여부가 불분명한 경우에는 임의로 판단하지 않고 사전에 교수자에게 확인한다.
18+privacy: Korea University tells learners not to enter personal information, non-public learning materials, or assessment questions into external AI tools, and to remember that AI inputs may be stored or reused.
19+Evidence (ko, 38c07b61afe8): 본인 또는 타인의 개인정보와 비공개 학습자료 ․ 평가 문항은 외부 AI 도구에 입력하지 않으며, AI에 입력한 내용이 저장되거나 재활용될 수 있음을 항상 염두에 둔다.
20+teaching: Korea University frames AI as a tool that assists education and learning, with human thought and judgment remaining central.
21+Evidence (ko, 38c07b61afe8): AI는 교육과 학습을 보조하는 도구이며, 사고와 판단의 주체는 언제나 인간이다. 교수자와 학습자는 AI의 도움을 받더라도 자신의 사고 과정과 판단을 중심에 두어야 하며, AI는 이를 대체할 수 없다.

Claim changes

12 claim records

academic_integrity

Korea University states that submitting AI-generated content as one’s own, or using it without permission, is academic misconduct.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesko

ai_tool_treatment

Korea University states that its AI guideline primarily applies to generative AI used directly in teaching and learning, while its basic principles also apply to educational use of all AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesko

academic_integrity

Korea University says AI-detection and plagiarism-prevention tools should be used only as supplementary references and not as the sole basis for misconduct findings.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesko

privacy

Korea University tells instructors not to enter personal information, academic records, assessment questions, or other sensitive or non-public materials into AI tools, with special caution for external AI services.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesko

academic_integrity

Korea University tells learners to disclose the AI tool name, timing, and scope of use, distinguish their own work from AI contributions, and cite AI-generated content according to the required format.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesko

source_status

Korea University University College Distance Learning Center distributed 2026 AI utilization guidelines and a guidebook to support responsible and effective AI use in teaching and learning.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesko

teaching

Korea University instructs instructors to decide course AI-use policies based on course purpose, teaching method, and assignment nature, and to state the policy in the syllabus.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesko

ai_tool_treatment

Korea University tells learners to check each course’s AI-use guideline before coursework and ask the instructor if permission is unclear.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesko

privacy

Korea University tells learners not to enter personal information, non-public learning materials, or assessment questions into external AI tools, and to remember that AI inputs may be stored or reused.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesko

teaching

Korea University frames AI as a tool that assists education and learning, with human thought and judgment remaining central.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesko

academic_integrity

Korea University says instructors should explain AI-use policies at the first class and notify learners that violations may be treated as academic integrity breaches.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesko

teaching

Korea University recommends designing assignments and assessments to show learners’ critical thinking, creativity, problem-solving process, and their own reasoning even when AI is used.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesko

Source snapshots

3 source attributions