變更紀錄
追蹤器歷史：0 筆發布紀錄。
目前公開紀錄的時效性與審查狀態。
5 條當前主張；4 個官方來源。
此頁面整合了所有公開發布版本差異，適用於 Manchester Metropolitan University.。個別發布快照仍可從其特定版本 URL 取得。
此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。
本追蹤器並非法律意見，亦非學術誠信建議；除非所連結的來源為大學本身的官方網頁，否則亦不構成大學的正式聲明。
新擷取的主張屬於追蹤器的新增項目，不一定是大學新近發布的內容。來源快照的變更表示同一來源網址的雜湊值有所改變，本身並不等同於政策變動。
此次版本差異的語意分類。
僅顯示具備完全符合 Claim ID 的已記錄比較。
此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。
追蹤器歷史：0 筆發布紀錄。
現行主張紀錄：5。
Manchester Metropolitan University's 2025/26 Academic Misconduct Policy treats unauthorised generative AI use in assessment, where a student attempts to gain an unfair advantage by passing it off as their own work, as academic misconduct that may be investigated under the policy.
Manchester Metropolitan University tells students to check the assessment brief for specific instructions on generative AI, says they should only use AI as directed, and says they cannot use it to create the assessment itself.
Manchester Metropolitan University's teaching guidance says it has opted out of enabling AI-generated text detection software for the foreseeable future and tells colleagues not to upload student work into online AI detection services because they are unreliable and the uploaded data is not secure.
Manchester Metropolitan University's teaching guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot as the approved generative AI tool for generating text and images, available to staff and students for free with university credentials.
Manchester Metropolitan University library guidance says some generative AI uses do not need citation, but documented AI-assisted search strategies, approved research-project AI use, AI-generated media in submitted assessments, and AI-generated code or Excel formulas must be cited or referenced.
官方來源紀錄：4。
official_policy_page 追蹤器檢查於 May 17, 2026, 5:39 PM
official_guidance 追蹤器檢查於 May 17, 2026, 5:39 PM
official_guidance 追蹤器檢查於 May 17, 2026, 5:40 PM
official_guidance 追蹤器檢查於 May 17, 2026, 5:40 PM
