AUS policy says students are forbidden from using generative AI tools to produce assessment work unless the course instructor explicitly permits that use.
claim-aus-gai-assessment-permission
Policy Statement, Authorization of usage of GAI tools
Course instructors must: Include the following details in the course syllabus: Name(s) of the generative AI tool(s) that can be used; Brief rationale for using the tool(s); Instructions on which assignments and class activities the tool(s) can be used for.
AUS policy says instructors must specify permitted generative AI tools, rationale, allowed assignments or activities, and an academic integrity statement in the course syllabus when AI tools are used.
claim-aus-instructors-syllabus-ai-details
Policy Statement, Course Instructor and Student Responsibilities
Students must: Acknowledge, in line with course policy, any usage of the tool(s) in all material submitted for course credit including the name and version number of the tool(s).
Students must: Take full responsibility for the accuracy of AI generated output in any work they produce. Ensure that any use of the tool(s) is compliant with the course syllabus, any updates posted on the course ilearn page, the most recent versions of the AUS academic integrity policy, and the AUS IT acceptable use policy.
AUS policy says students are responsible for the accuracy of AI-generated output in their work and must ensure use complies with syllabus, iLearn updates, academic integrity policy, and IT acceptable use policy.
The institution does not prohibit the use of GAI detection software at any stage of the academic integrity adjudication process but does recognize that the output of such tools cannot provide a definitive judgement on whether an academic integrity violation has taken place.
AUS policy says the institution does not prohibit generative AI detection software in academic integrity adjudication but recognizes detection output cannot provide a definitive judgment.
AUS policy says students are forbidden from using generative AI tools to produce assessment work unless the course instructor explicitly permits that use.
claim-aus-gai-assessment-permission
Policy Statement, Authorization of usage of GAI tools
Course instructors must: Include the following details in the course syllabus: Name(s) of the generative AI tool(s) that can be used; Brief rationale for using the tool(s); Instructions on which assignments and class activities the tool(s) can be used for.
AUS policy says instructors must specify permitted generative AI tools, rationale, allowed assignments or activities, and an academic integrity statement in the course syllabus when AI tools are used.
claim-aus-instructors-syllabus-ai-details
Policy Statement, Course Instructor and Student Responsibilities
Students must: Acknowledge, in line with course policy, any usage of the tool(s) in all material submitted for course credit including the name and version number of the tool(s).
Students must: Take full responsibility for the accuracy of AI generated output in any work they produce. Ensure that any use of the tool(s) is compliant with the course syllabus, any updates posted on the course ilearn page, the most recent versions of the AUS academic integrity policy, and the AUS IT acceptable use policy.
AUS policy says students are responsible for the accuracy of AI-generated output in their work and must ensure use complies with syllabus, iLearn updates, academic integrity policy, and IT acceptable use policy.
The institution does not prohibit the use of GAI detection software at any stage of the academic integrity adjudication process but does recognize that the output of such tools cannot provide a definitive judgement on whether an academic integrity violation has taken place.
AUS policy says the institution does not prohibit generative AI detection software in academic integrity adjudication but recognizes detection output cannot provide a definitive judgment.
Students must: Acknowledge, in line with course policy, any usage of the tool(s) in all material submitted for course credit including the name and version number of the tool(s).
Students must: Take full responsibility for the accuracy of AI generated output in any work they produce. Ensure that any use of the tool(s) is compliant with the course syllabus, any updates posted on the course ilearn page, the most recent versions of the AUS academic integrity policy, and the AUS IT acceptable use policy.
AUS policy says students are responsible for the accuracy of AI-generated output in their work and must ensure use complies with syllabus, iLearn updates, academic integrity policy, and IT acceptable use policy.
AUS policy applies to undergraduate and graduate teaching and learning environments and says faculty research use of generative AI tools is not covered by this policy.
AUS policy says students are forbidden from using generative AI tools to produce assessment work unless the course instructor explicitly permits that use.
claim-aus-gai-assessment-permission
Policy Statement, Authorization of usage of GAI tools
Course instructors must: Include the following details in the course syllabus: Name(s) of the generative AI tool(s) that can be used; Brief rationale for using the tool(s); Instructions on which assignments and class activities the tool(s) can be used for.
AUS policy says instructors must specify permitted generative AI tools, rationale, allowed assignments or activities, and an academic integrity statement in the course syllabus when AI tools are used.
claim-aus-instructors-syllabus-ai-details
Policy Statement, Course Instructor and Student Responsibilities
Students must: Acknowledge, in line with course policy, any usage of the tool(s) in all material submitted for course credit including the name and version number of the tool(s).
Students must: Take full responsibility for the accuracy of AI generated output in any work they produce. Ensure that any use of the tool(s) is compliant with the course syllabus, any updates posted on the course ilearn page, the most recent versions of the AUS academic integrity policy, and the AUS IT acceptable use policy.
AUS policy says students are responsible for the accuracy of AI-generated output in their work and must ensure use complies with syllabus, iLearn updates, academic integrity policy, and IT acceptable use policy.
The institution does not prohibit the use of GAI detection software at any stage of the academic integrity adjudication process but does recognize that the output of such tools cannot provide a definitive judgement on whether an academic integrity violation has taken place.
AUS policy says the institution does not prohibit generative AI detection software in academic integrity adjudication but recognizes detection output cannot provide a definitive judgment.
AUS policy says students are forbidden from using generative AI tools to produce assessment work unless the course instructor explicitly permits that use.
claim-aus-gai-assessment-permission
Policy Statement, Authorization of usage of GAI tools
Course instructors must: Include the following details in the course syllabus: Name(s) of the generative AI tool(s) that can be used; Brief rationale for using the tool(s); Instructions on which assignments and class activities the tool(s) can be used for.
AUS policy says instructors must specify permitted generative AI tools, rationale, allowed assignments or activities, and an academic integrity statement in the course syllabus when AI tools are used.
claim-aus-instructors-syllabus-ai-details
Policy Statement, Course Instructor and Student Responsibilities
Students must: Take full responsibility for the accuracy of AI generated output in any work they produce. Ensure that any use of the tool(s) is compliant with the course syllabus, any updates posted on the course ilearn page, the most recent versions of the AUS academic integrity policy, and the AUS IT acceptable use policy.
AUS policy says students are responsible for the accuracy of AI-generated output in their work and must ensure use complies with syllabus, iLearn updates, academic integrity policy, and IT acceptable use policy.
AUS policy applies to undergraduate and graduate teaching and learning environments and says faculty research use of generative AI tools is not covered by this policy.
AUS policy says students are forbidden from using generative AI tools to produce assessment work unless the course instructor explicitly permits that use.
Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność96%
Wartość znormalizowana: gai_assessment_use_requires_instructor_permission
Ostatnio sprawdzono
16 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
16 maj 2026
Oryginalny dowód
Dowód 1
Students are forbidden from using GAI tools to produce any work for assessment unless that use is explicitly permitted by the course instructor.
Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
b4ff98fd…
Pobrano
16 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Policy Statement, Authorization of usage of GAI tools
Uczciwość akademicka
AUS policy says students must acknowledge generative AI tool use in submitted course-credit material, including the tool name and version number.
Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność95%
Wartość znormalizowana: students_must_acknowledge_gai_tool_use
Ostatnio sprawdzono
16 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
16 maj 2026
Oryginalny dowód
Dowód 1
Students must: Acknowledge, in line with course policy, any usage of the tool(s) in all material submitted for course credit including the name and version number of the tool(s).
Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
b4ff98fd…
Pobrano
16 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Policy Statement, Student Responsibilities
Uczciwość akademicka
AUS policy says the institution does not prohibit generative AI detection software in academic integrity adjudication but recognizes detection output cannot provide a definitive judgment.
Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność92%
Wartość znormalizowana: gai_detection_not_definitive_judgment
Ostatnio sprawdzono
16 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
16 maj 2026
Oryginalny dowód
Dowód 1
The institution does not prohibit the use of GAI detection software at any stage of the academic integrity adjudication process but does recognize that the output of such tools cannot provide a definitive judgement on whether an academic integrity violation has taken place.
Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
b4ff98fd…
Pobrano
16 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
GAI detection software
Nauczanie Zweryfikowane stwierdzenia: 1
Nauczanie
AUS policy says instructors must specify permitted generative AI tools, rationale, allowed assignments or activities, and an academic integrity statement in the course syllabus when AI tools are used.
Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność95%
Wartość znormalizowana: instructors_must_state_ai_permissions_in_syllabus
Ostatnio sprawdzono
16 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
16 maj 2026
Oryginalny dowód
Dowód 1
Course instructors must: Include the following details in the course syllabus: Name(s) of the generative AI tool(s) that can be used; Brief rationale for using the tool(s); Instructions on which assignments and class activities the tool(s) can be used for.
Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
b4ff98fd…
Pobrano
16 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Policy Statement, Course Instructor and Student Responsibilities
Zasady używania narzędzi AI Zweryfikowane stwierdzenia: 1
Zasady używania narzędzi AI
AUS policy says students are responsible for the accuracy of AI-generated output in their work and must ensure use complies with syllabus, iLearn updates, academic integrity policy, and IT acceptable use policy.
Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność93%
Wartość znormalizowana: students_responsible_for_ai_accuracy_and_compliance
Ostatnio sprawdzono
16 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
16 maj 2026
Oryginalny dowód
Dowód 1
Students must: Take full responsibility for the accuracy of AI generated output in any work they produce. Ensure that any use of the tool(s) is compliant with the course syllabus, any updates posted on the course ilearn page, the most recent versions of the AUS academic integrity policy, and the AUS IT acceptable use policy.
Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
b4ff98fd…
Pobrano
16 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Policy Statement, Student Responsibilities
Status źródła Zweryfikowane stwierdzenia: 1
Status źródła
AUS policy applies to undergraduate and graduate teaching and learning environments and says faculty research use of generative AI tools is not covered by this policy.
Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność91%
Wartość znormalizowana: policy_scope_teaching_learning_not_faculty_research
Ostatnio sprawdzono
16 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
16 maj 2026
Oryginalny dowód
Dowód 1
All undergraduate and graduate teaching and learning environments at AUS. The use of GAI tools in faculty research is not covered under this policy.
Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
b4ff98fd…
Pobrano
16 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Scope/applicability
Wpis źródłowy
Oficjalne źródła
Źródła: 2
2 official URLs; 2 source attributions and their captured versions retained.
0.f. Generative AI (GAI) Tools in Teaching and Learning Policy
aihub.aus.edu
Oficjalne źródło uczelni
aihub.aus.edu
Hash and captured version
0.f. Generative AI (GAI) Tools in Teaching and Learning Policy · 2026-05-16T04:18:00.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
Cytowanie: University AI Policy Tracker. "American University of Sharjah AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 16, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/american-university-of-sharjah
Rozstrzygająca pozostaje oryginalna wersja językowa źródła uczelni. Ten serwis nie jest oficjalnym stanowiskiem uczelni.
Saved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.
Częste pytania
Częste pytania
Czy mogę używać AI w zadaniach?
American University of Sharjah has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
