Catat revisi
Pembaruan pada catatan situs ini yang telah ditinjau, bukan konfirmasi bahwa universitas telah mengubah kebijakannya.
Waktu publikasi tracker bukan tanggal berlaku kebijakan universitas.
Rekaman yang terlibat: 11 (2 dikoreksi / disesuaikan · 9 ditambahkan)
Perlakuan Alat AI · Integritas akademik · 8 topik lainnya
ME guidance uses a “Yes, unless” rule of thumb for unsupervised work, subject to written course restrictions and the student’s own reasoning/writing responsibilities. Check the course statement; this is not a university-wide default or an exam permission.
ME2026/27 MSc Article7 treats examination aids not expressly permitted as fraud examples. Check the exact exam authorization; unsupervised coursework guidance does not authorize examination aids.
Where the ME instructor limits AI, students must disclose use for work contributing to a grade using the selected acknowledgement format. End/appendix placement is a recommendation and excluded from word count. Not acknowledging restricted use could be fraud, not automatically a finding.
Teaching guidance advises not sharing personal, internal or highly confidential information with AI. Tool log/retention and procurement approval are not established by that advice.
Teaching Support currently identifies NetID Copilot Chat as the permitted educational GenAI service and says a university-wide policy is in development. ME recommends web Copilot with Delft credentials; service access does not authorize a specific task. Do not substitute AI for personal analysis.
TU Delft OPEN Publishing requires disclosure of generative AI use within its publishing policy. Human-participant research needs HREC approval before engaging participants. These scopes do not establish every thesis/journal rule or assessment permission.
An appealable examiner/Board decision can be challenged before CBE within six weeks starting the day after the decision was announced/sent. Pro-forma appeals and exceptional non-culpable lateness have separate conditions; check the actual decision and appealability.
ME2026/27 BSc/MSc Article7 covers AI output presented as one’s own through deception, carelessness or inadequate referencing. The programme Board of Examiners handles suspected fraud; students can respond orally/in writing before a finding/sanction, except no hearing is required if no fraud is found. No result/annulment normally follows fraud, with exceptional cases; further sanctions are case-specific.
Teaching Support warns that relying on AI detectors to penalise students risks false accusations; use appropriate authenticity checks and Board procedures. This is not a university ban on detectors.
Microsoft Copilot (web) is listed for Delft University of Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
The ME faculty recommends web Microsoft Copilot and states students can sign in with their TU Delft credentials; recommendation and access do not establish blanket task permission or an institution-wide endorsement.
TU Delft teaching guidance says Microsoft Copilot Chat, after login with NetID, is currently the only generative AI tool permitted for use at TU Delft for education.
TU Delft Teaching Support says NetID-authenticated Microsoft Copilot Chat is currently the only tool permitted for educational use; the institution-wide policy remains under development, and individual assessments are subject to their own rules.
Teks lama dan baru yang sebanding tidak tersedia.
Teks lama dan baru yang sebanding tidak tersedia.
Teks lama dan baru yang sebanding tidak tersedia.
Teks lama dan baru yang sebanding tidak tersedia.
Teks lama dan baru yang sebanding tidak tersedia.
Teks lama dan baru yang sebanding tidak tersedia.
Teks lama dan baru yang sebanding tidak tersedia.
Teks lama dan baru yang sebanding tidak tersedia.
Teks lama dan baru yang sebanding tidak tersedia.
