Any work or content generated with the assistance of GenAI tools be fully disclosed to ensure transparency and maintain academic integrity. Specifically, if GenAI tools are used to create distinct elements—such as images, tables, data visualizations, or significant sections of text—this use should be noted as such.
IIT Delhi's GenAI guidelines call for full disclosure of any work or content generated with the assistance of GenAI tools, including noting AI-created images, tables, data visualizations, or significant text sections.
Authors of content assume full responsibility for verifying the accuracy of their work. The content should be rigorously fact-checked to ensure it is correct and up-to-date. Proactive measures should be undertaken to confirm that the content is free from plagiarism.
The guidelines state that authors remain fully responsible for verifying the accuracy of AI-assisted work, rigorously fact-checking it and proactively confirming it is free from plagiarism.
Recognizing that outright restriction on the use of GenAI tools in academic tasks is neither enforceable nor desirable, it is recommended that each course instructor develop a plagiarism policy under the updated curriculum.
IIT Delhi's committee holds that outright restriction of GenAI tools is neither enforceable nor desirable and recommends that each course instructor develop their own plagiarism policy governing AI use.
Such a policy should establish differentiated consequences for misuse of AI, such as submitting AI-generated work without any personal input or understanding. At the same time, it should reward honest, responsible engagement with AI tools.
Course-level plagiarism policies are expected to set differentiated consequences for AI misuse while rewarding honest, responsible engagement with AI tools.
It is recommended that the institute acquire an institute-wide license for the advanced and more accurate versions of GenAI tools which are behind paywalls, such as ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot. This is to ensure equitable access to the tools across all departments and users.
The committee recommends that IIT Delhi acquire institute-wide licenses for paid GenAI tools such as ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot to ensure equitable access.
Any work or content generated with the assistance of GenAI tools be fully disclosed to ensure transparency and maintain academic integrity. Specifically, if GenAI tools are used to create distinct elements—such as images, tables, data visualizations, or significant sections of text—this use should be noted as such.
IIT Delhi's GenAI guidelines call for full disclosure of any work or content generated with the assistance of GenAI tools, including noting AI-created images, tables, data visualizations, or significant text sections.
Authors of content assume full responsibility for verifying the accuracy of their work. The content should be rigorously fact-checked to ensure it is correct and up-to-date. Proactive measures should be undertaken to confirm that the content is free from plagiarism.
The guidelines state that authors remain fully responsible for verifying the accuracy of AI-assisted work, rigorously fact-checking it and proactively confirming it is free from plagiarism.
Recognizing that outright restriction on the use of GenAI tools in academic tasks is neither enforceable nor desirable, it is recommended that each course instructor develop a plagiarism policy under the updated curriculum.
IIT Delhi's committee holds that outright restriction of GenAI tools is neither enforceable nor desirable and recommends that each course instructor develop their own plagiarism policy governing AI use.
Such a policy should establish differentiated consequences for misuse of AI, such as submitting AI-generated work without any personal input or understanding. At the same time, it should reward honest, responsible engagement with AI tools.
Course-level plagiarism policies are expected to set differentiated consequences for AI misuse while rewarding honest, responsible engagement with AI tools.
It is recommended that the institute acquire an institute-wide license for the advanced and more accurate versions of GenAI tools which are behind paywalls, such as ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot. This is to ensure equitable access to the tools across all departments and users.
The committee recommends that IIT Delhi acquire institute-wide licenses for paid GenAI tools such as ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot to ensure equitable access.
Any work or content generated with the assistance of GenAI tools be fully disclosed to ensure transparency and maintain academic integrity. Specifically, if GenAI tools are used to create distinct elements—such as images, tables, data visualizations, or significant sections of text—this use should be noted as such.
IIT Delhi's GenAI guidelines call for full disclosure of any work or content generated with the assistance of GenAI tools, including noting AI-created images, tables, data visualizations, or significant text sections.
All users exercise caution when inputting data or queries into GenAI tools, as these inputs could potentially become publicly accessible. Before utilizing such tools, users should thoroughly screen any information to identify and exclude sensitive or private details.
Any work or content generated with the assistance of GenAI tools be fully disclosed to ensure transparency and maintain academic integrity. Specifically, if GenAI tools are used to create distinct elements—such as images, tables, data visualizations, or significant sections of text—this use should be noted as such.
IIT Delhi's GenAI guidelines call for full disclosure of any work or content generated with the assistance of GenAI tools, including noting AI-created images, tables, data visualizations, or significant text sections.
It is recommended that the institute acquire an institute-wide license for the advanced and more accurate versions of GenAI tools which are behind paywalls, such as ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot. This is to ensure equitable access to the tools across all departments and users.
The committee recommends that IIT Delhi acquire institute-wide licenses for paid GenAI tools such as ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot to ensure equitable access.
Authors of content assume full responsibility for verifying the accuracy of their work. The content should be rigorously fact-checked to ensure it is correct and up-to-date. Proactive measures should be undertaken to confirm that the content is free from plagiarism.
The guidelines state that authors remain fully responsible for verifying the accuracy of AI-assisted work, rigorously fact-checking it and proactively confirming it is free from plagiarism.
Recognizing that outright restriction on the use of GenAI tools in academic tasks is neither enforceable nor desirable, it is recommended that each course instructor develop a plagiarism policy under the updated curriculum.
IIT Delhi's committee holds that outright restriction of GenAI tools is neither enforceable nor desirable and recommends that each course instructor develop their own plagiarism policy governing AI use.
Such a policy should establish differentiated consequences for misuse of AI, such as submitting AI-generated work without any personal input or understanding. At the same time, it should reward honest, responsible engagement with AI tools.
Course-level plagiarism policies are expected to set differentiated consequences for AI misuse while rewarding honest, responsible engagement with AI tools.
Recognizing that outright restriction on the use of GenAI tools in academic tasks is neither enforceable nor desirable, it is recommended that each course instructor develop a plagiarism policy under the updated curriculum.
IIT Delhi's committee holds that outright restriction of GenAI tools is neither enforceable nor desirable and recommends that each course instructor develop their own plagiarism policy governing AI use.
This may entail reevaluating current methods of assessment for assignments and examinations, prioritizing approaches that encourage critical thinking, original analysis, and application of knowledge in ways that AI tools cannot replicate easily.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
Security and procurementIndian Institute of Technology Delhi (IITD)
Not mentioned in reviewed sources
Status & scope
Scope stated in the cited claims
Original official evidence
No reviewed evidence is included for this topic. This does not establish that no rule exists.
More policy information
Published source-based additions (2)
These tracker summaries are based on retained official-source material. Present applicability has not been independently confirmed. English summaries and original-language quotations are retained unless a checked Chinese summary is available.
Disclosure
AI-specific provision
Site summary · original evidence below
The committee recommends fully disclosing AIassisted work, including images/tables/visualisations/significant text, in captions, footnotes or a statement. This is a recommendation in the report, not independently confirmed as a binding universitywide submission rule.
Scope
Students · Scope not established · Committee recommendations; adoption asbindingInstitute policy notverified
3.1 For teachers, researchers & students
• Disclosure. Any work or content generated with the assistance of
GenAI tools be fully disclosed to ensure transparency and maintain
academic integrity. Specifically, if GenAI tools are used to create distinct
elements—such as images, tables, data visualizations, or significant
sections of text—this use should be noted as such. Such disclosure
can be incorporated into captions, footnotes, or a statement within the
work.
The report recommends caution and screening prompts/inputs to exclude sensitive/private information, including personallyidentifiable information and confidential institutional data, because inputs may become publicly accessible.
Scope
Students · Scope not established · Committee recommendations; adoption asbindingInstitute policy notverified
• Data privacy. All users exercise caution when inputting data or
queries into GenAI tools, as these inputs could potentially become
publicly accessible. Before utilizing such tools, users should thoroughly
screen any information to identify and exclude sensitive or private de-
tails. This includes personal identifiable information (PII), confidential
institutional data, and any other content that could compromise privacy
or security if exposed.
Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.
Update records are not available for this page yet.
Reviewed record
Reviewed claims
8 reviewed claims
Academic Integrity 2 reviewed claims
Academic Integrity
The guidelines state that authors remain fully responsible for verifying the accuracy of AI-assisted work, rigorously fact-checking it and proactively confirming it is free from plagiarism.
Authors of content assume full responsibility for verifying the accuracy of their work. The content should be rigorously fact-checked to ensure it is correct and up-to-date. Proactive measures should be undertaken to confirm that the content is free from plagiarism.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
35f4baba…
Retrieved
Jul 27, 2026
Evidence locator
Section 3.1, Ownership, p. 5
Academic Integrity
Course-level plagiarism policies are expected to set differentiated consequences for AI misuse while rewarding honest, responsible engagement with AI tools.
Such a policy should establish differentiated consequences for misuse of AI, such as submitting AI-generated work without any personal input or understanding. At the same time, it should reward honest, responsible engagement with AI tools.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
35f4baba…
Retrieved
Jul 27, 2026
Evidence locator
Section 3.3, Plagiarism Policy, p. 7
Teaching 2 reviewed claims
Teaching
IIT Delhi's committee holds that outright restriction of GenAI tools is neither enforceable nor desirable and recommends that each course instructor develop their own plagiarism policy governing AI use.
Recognizing that outright restriction on the use of GenAI tools in academic tasks is neither enforceable nor desirable, it is recommended that each course instructor develop a plagiarism policy under the updated curriculum.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
35f4baba…
Retrieved
Jul 27, 2026
Evidence locator
Section 3.3, Plagiarism Policy, pp. 6-7
Teaching
Academic Units are advised to reevaluate assessment methods, prioritizing approaches that AI tools cannot easily replicate.
This may entail reevaluating current methods of assessment for assignments and examinations, prioritizing approaches that encourage critical thinking, original analysis, and application of knowledge in ways that AI tools cannot replicate easily.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
35f4baba…
Retrieved
Jul 27, 2026
Evidence locator
Section 3.3, Redesigning PLOs, CLOs, p. 6
Privacy 1 reviewed claim
Privacy
The guidelines direct all users to exercise caution when entering data into GenAI tools and to screen out sensitive or private details before use.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%
Normalized value: iitd_genai_guidelines_privacy_3
Last checked
Jul 27, 2026
Last changed
Jul 27, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
All users exercise caution when inputting data or queries into GenAI tools, as these inputs could potentially become publicly accessible. Before utilizing such tools, users should thoroughly screen any information to identify and exclude sensitive or private details.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
35f4baba…
Retrieved
Jul 27, 2026
Evidence locator
Section 3.1, Data privacy, p. 5
AI tool use 2 reviewed claims
Ai Tool Treatment
IIT Delhi's GenAI guidelines call for full disclosure of any work or content generated with the assistance of GenAI tools, including noting AI-created images, tables, data visualizations, or significant text sections.
Any work or content generated with the assistance of GenAI tools be fully disclosed to ensure transparency and maintain academic integrity. Specifically, if GenAI tools are used to create distinct elements—such as images, tables, data visualizations, or significant sections of text—this use should be noted as such.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
35f4baba…
Retrieved
Jul 27, 2026
Evidence locator
Section 3.1, Disclosure, p. 5
Ai Tool Treatment
The committee recommends that IIT Delhi acquire institute-wide licenses for paid GenAI tools such as ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot to ensure equitable access.
It is recommended that the institute acquire an institute-wide license for the advanced and more accurate versions of GenAI tools which are behind paywalls, such as ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot. This is to ensure equitable access to the tools across all departments and users.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
35f4baba…
Retrieved
Jul 27, 2026
Evidence locator
Section 3.2, For the Institute, p. 6
Source Status 1 reviewed claim
Source Status
IIT Delhi's official Central Library archive lists a May 1-31, 2025 NewsClips PDF at lib.iitd.ac.in; this run did not stage substantive AI-policy claims from that PDF because the linked host was inaccessible from the crawl environment.
Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IITD) AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 27, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/indian-institute-of-technology-delhi
Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.
Saved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.
Questions students ask
Questions students ask
Can I use AI for my coursework?
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IITD) has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
