This policy applies to the development, approval, use and management of GenAI software, systems, or platforms that may be used by University of Regina employees... All University use of GenAI must be ethical, reliable, transparent, secure and compliant with applicable laws and regulations.
University of Regina policy OPS-080-050 says all University use of generative AI must be ethical, reliable, transparent, secure, and compliant with applicable laws and regulations; the policy primarily addresses governance and operations uses by employees.
Any employee who is considering a GenAI project or system must identify, assess and analyze risks and opportunities... including privacy and security. Any University-wide GenAI project, tool, system or intended use of enterprise-level data requires approval through established IT project approval processes.
For GenAI projects or systems, University of Regina employees are directed to identify, assess, and analyze risks including privacy and security, and University-wide GenAI projects, tools, systems, or intended enterprise-data uses require approval through established IT project approval processes.
Due to the unreliability of AI-detection tools, and the possibility of false positives, the AI-detection report cannot be considered conclusive proof of academic misconduct... Turnitin is presently the only institutionally adopted plagiarism- and AI-detection tool and... instructors are not permitted to use non-approved tools for the purpose of AI-detection.
University of Regina CTL guidance says Turnitin is the only institutionally adopted plagiarism- and AI-detection tool, the AI-detection report is not conclusive proof of academic misconduct, and instructors are not permitted to use non-approved tools for AI detection.
claim-uregina-ai-detection-tools
Can/should instructors use tools to detect AI-generated content?
It is strongly recommended that instructors incorporate a statement on the use of generative AI into course syllabi... Instructors should require students to disclose when and how they've incorporated AI into their coursework... Instructors should also endeavour to protect the privacy and intellectual property of students in any use of generative AI in teaching.
University of Regina CTL guidance for faculty and instructors recommends that instructors set clear GenAI rules and syllabus statements, require students to disclose AI use when incorporated into coursework, and protect student privacy and intellectual property in teaching uses of GenAI.
claim-uregina-instructor-ai-guidelines
How can instructors help to prevent the misuse of ChatGPT and other generative AI in academic work?
Individual instructors may determine whether the use of AI will be permitted, and to what extent, when it comes to assigned course work... improper or unauthorized use of AI can constitute academic misconduct.
The University of Regina Provost's message to students says individual instructors may determine whether and to what extent AI is permitted in course work, and warns that improper or unauthorized AI use can constitute academic misconduct.
This policy applies to the development, approval, use and management of GenAI software, systems, or platforms that may be used by University of Regina employees... All University use of GenAI must be ethical, reliable, transparent, secure and compliant with applicable laws and regulations.
University of Regina policy OPS-080-050 says all University use of generative AI must be ethical, reliable, transparent, secure, and compliant with applicable laws and regulations; the policy primarily addresses governance and operations uses by employees.
Due to the unreliability of AI-detection tools, and the possibility of false positives, the AI-detection report cannot be considered conclusive proof of academic misconduct... Turnitin is presently the only institutionally adopted plagiarism- and AI-detection tool and... instructors are not permitted to use non-approved tools for the purpose of AI-detection.
University of Regina CTL guidance says Turnitin is the only institutionally adopted plagiarism- and AI-detection tool, the AI-detection report is not conclusive proof of academic misconduct, and instructors are not permitted to use non-approved tools for AI detection.
claim-uregina-ai-detection-tools
Can/should instructors use tools to detect AI-generated content?
It is strongly recommended that instructors incorporate a statement on the use of generative AI into course syllabi... Instructors should require students to disclose when and how they've incorporated AI into their coursework... Instructors should also endeavour to protect the privacy and intellectual property of students in any use of generative AI in teaching.
University of Regina CTL guidance for faculty and instructors recommends that instructors set clear GenAI rules and syllabus statements, require students to disclose AI use when incorporated into coursework, and protect student privacy and intellectual property in teaching uses of GenAI.
claim-uregina-instructor-ai-guidelines
How can instructors help to prevent the misuse of ChatGPT and other generative AI in academic work?
Individual instructors may determine whether the use of AI will be permitted, and to what extent, when it comes to assigned course work... improper or unauthorized use of AI can constitute academic misconduct.
The University of Regina Provost's message to students says individual instructors may determine whether and to what extent AI is permitted in course work, and warns that improper or unauthorized AI use can constitute academic misconduct.
These questions will guide you in determining whether or not use is acceptable: 1. Do you have permission to use AI in your program or course work? 2. Have you followed the assignment instructions? ... 4. Have you checked if the GenAI output is accurate? 5. Have you cited GenAI in your work?
Archer Library's student-facing GenAI guidance tells students to check whether they have permission to use AI in their program or coursework, follow assignment instructions, verify GenAI output accuracy, and cite GenAI in their work.
It is strongly recommended that instructors incorporate a statement on the use of generative AI into course syllabi... Instructors should require students to disclose when and how they've incorporated AI into their coursework... Instructors should also endeavour to protect the privacy and intellectual property of students in any use of generative AI in teaching.
University of Regina CTL guidance for faculty and instructors recommends that instructors set clear GenAI rules and syllabus statements, require students to disclose AI use when incorporated into coursework, and protect student privacy and intellectual property in teaching uses of GenAI.
claim-uregina-instructor-ai-guidelines
How can instructors help to prevent the misuse of ChatGPT and other generative AI in academic work?
These questions will guide you in determining whether or not use is acceptable: 1. Do you have permission to use AI in your program or course work? 2. Have you followed the assignment instructions? ... 4. Have you checked if the GenAI output is accurate? 5. Have you cited GenAI in your work?
Archer Library's student-facing GenAI guidance tells students to check whether they have permission to use AI in their program or coursework, follow assignment instructions, verify GenAI output accuracy, and cite GenAI in their work.
In general, though, you should treat AI-generated materials as a non-recoverable source and/or akin to personal communication... As always, please be sure to check with your instructor if in doubt about when to cite AI and what style to use.
Archer Library's GenAI citation guide says AI-generated materials should generally be treated as a non-recoverable source and/or akin to personal communication, while students should check with their instructor if in doubt about when to cite AI and which style to use.
Data used to develop algorithms or GenAI systems, and any data generated, shared, managed and/or recorded as part of an GenAI system's operation or algorithm, will be considered institutional data and must be managed in alignment with GOV-060-005 Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy policy and the University's data handling standards.
University of Regina policy treats data used to develop, operate, share, manage, or record GenAI systems as institutional data that must align with the University's Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy policy and data handling standards.
Any employee who is considering a GenAI project or system must identify, assess and analyze risks and opportunities... including privacy and security. Any University-wide GenAI project, tool, system or intended use of enterprise-level data requires approval through established IT project approval processes.
For GenAI projects or systems, University of Regina employees are directed to identify, assess, and analyze risks including privacy and security, and University-wide GenAI projects, tools, systems, or intended enterprise-data uses require approval through established IT project approval processes.
It is strongly recommended that instructors incorporate a statement on the use of generative AI into course syllabi... Instructors should require students to disclose when and how they've incorporated AI into their coursework... Instructors should also endeavour to protect the privacy and intellectual property of students in any use of generative AI in teaching.
University of Regina CTL guidance for faculty and instructors recommends that instructors set clear GenAI rules and syllabus statements, require students to disclose AI use when incorporated into coursework, and protect student privacy and intellectual property in teaching uses of GenAI.
claim-uregina-instructor-ai-guidelines
How can instructors help to prevent the misuse of ChatGPT and other generative AI in academic work?
Data used to develop algorithms or GenAI systems, and any data generated, shared, managed and/or recorded as part of an GenAI system's operation or algorithm, will be considered institutional data and must be managed in alignment with GOV-060-005 Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy policy and the University's data handling standards.
University of Regina policy treats data used to develop, operate, share, manage, or record GenAI systems as institutional data that must align with the University's Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy policy and data handling standards.
This policy applies to the development, approval, use and management of GenAI software, systems, or platforms that may be used by University of Regina employees... All University use of GenAI must be ethical, reliable, transparent, secure and compliant with applicable laws and regulations.
University of Regina policy OPS-080-050 says all University use of generative AI must be ethical, reliable, transparent, secure, and compliant with applicable laws and regulations; the policy primarily addresses governance and operations uses by employees.
Any employee who is considering a GenAI project or system must identify, assess and analyze risks and opportunities... including privacy and security. Any University-wide GenAI project, tool, system or intended use of enterprise-level data requires approval through established IT project approval processes.
For GenAI projects or systems, University of Regina employees are directed to identify, assess, and analyze risks including privacy and security, and University-wide GenAI projects, tools, systems, or intended enterprise-data uses require approval through established IT project approval processes.
Due to the unreliability of AI-detection tools, and the possibility of false positives, the AI-detection report cannot be considered conclusive proof of academic misconduct... Turnitin is presently the only institutionally adopted plagiarism- and AI-detection tool and... instructors are not permitted to use non-approved tools for the purpose of AI-detection.
University of Regina CTL guidance says Turnitin is the only institutionally adopted plagiarism- and AI-detection tool, the AI-detection report is not conclusive proof of academic misconduct, and instructors are not permitted to use non-approved tools for AI detection.
claim-uregina-ai-detection-tools
Can/should instructors use tools to detect AI-generated content?
Due to the unreliability of AI-detection tools, and the possibility of false positives, the AI-detection report cannot be considered conclusive proof of academic misconduct... Turnitin is presently the only institutionally adopted plagiarism- and AI-detection tool and... instructors are not permitted to use non-approved tools for the purpose of AI-detection.
University of Regina CTL guidance says Turnitin is the only institutionally adopted plagiarism- and AI-detection tool, the AI-detection report is not conclusive proof of academic misconduct, and instructors are not permitted to use non-approved tools for AI detection.
claim-uregina-ai-detection-tools
Can/should instructors use tools to detect AI-generated content?
Individual instructors may determine whether the use of AI will be permitted, and to what extent, when it comes to assigned course work... improper or unauthorized use of AI can constitute academic misconduct.
The University of Regina Provost's message to students says individual instructors may determine whether and to what extent AI is permitted in course work, and warns that improper or unauthorized AI use can constitute academic misconduct.
These questions will guide you in determining whether or not use is acceptable: 1. Do you have permission to use AI in your program or course work? 2. Have you followed the assignment instructions? ... 4. Have you checked if the GenAI output is accurate? 5. Have you cited GenAI in your work?
Archer Library's student-facing GenAI guidance tells students to check whether they have permission to use AI in their program or coursework, follow assignment instructions, verify GenAI output accuracy, and cite GenAI in their work.
In general, though, you should treat AI-generated materials as a non-recoverable source and/or akin to personal communication... As always, please be sure to check with your instructor if in doubt about when to cite AI and what style to use.
Archer Library's GenAI citation guide says AI-generated materials should generally be treated as a non-recoverable source and/or akin to personal communication, while students should check with their instructor if in doubt about when to cite AI and which style to use.
Due to the unreliability of AI-detection tools, and the possibility of false positives, the AI-detection report cannot be considered conclusive proof of academic misconduct... Turnitin is presently the only institutionally adopted plagiarism- and AI-detection tool and... instructors are not permitted to use non-approved tools for the purpose of AI-detection.
University of Regina CTL guidance says Turnitin is the only institutionally adopted plagiarism- and AI-detection tool, the AI-detection report is not conclusive proof of academic misconduct, and instructors are not permitted to use non-approved tools for AI detection.
claim-uregina-ai-detection-tools
Can/should instructors use tools to detect AI-generated content?
It is strongly recommended that instructors incorporate a statement on the use of generative AI into course syllabi... Instructors should require students to disclose when and how they've incorporated AI into their coursework... Instructors should also endeavour to protect the privacy and intellectual property of students in any use of generative AI in teaching.
University of Regina CTL guidance for faculty and instructors recommends that instructors set clear GenAI rules and syllabus statements, require students to disclose AI use when incorporated into coursework, and protect student privacy and intellectual property in teaching uses of GenAI.
claim-uregina-instructor-ai-guidelines
How can instructors help to prevent the misuse of ChatGPT and other generative AI in academic work?
Individual instructors may determine whether the use of AI will be permitted, and to what extent, when it comes to assigned course work... improper or unauthorized use of AI can constitute academic misconduct.
The University of Regina Provost's message to students says individual instructors may determine whether and to what extent AI is permitted in course work, and warns that improper or unauthorized AI use can constitute academic misconduct.
In general, though, you should treat AI-generated materials as a non-recoverable source and/or akin to personal communication... As always, please be sure to check with your instructor if in doubt about when to cite AI and what style to use.
Archer Library's GenAI citation guide says AI-generated materials should generally be treated as a non-recoverable source and/or akin to personal communication, while students should check with their instructor if in doubt about when to cite AI and which style to use.
Any employee who is considering a GenAI project or system must identify, assess and analyze risks and opportunities... including privacy and security. Any University-wide GenAI project, tool, system or intended use of enterprise-level data requires approval through established IT project approval processes.
For GenAI projects or systems, University of Regina employees are directed to identify, assess, and analyze risks including privacy and security, and University-wide GenAI projects, tools, systems, or intended enterprise-data uses require approval through established IT project approval processes.
Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.
Update records are not available for this page yet.
Reviewed record
Reviewed claims
8 reviewed claims
Academic Integrity 3 reviewed claims
Academic Integrity
The University of Regina Provost's message to students says individual instructors may determine whether and to what extent AI is permitted in course work, and warns that improper or unauthorized AI use can constitute academic misconduct.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%
Normalized value: Student AI use is course/instructor-specific, and unauthorized use can be academic misconduct.
Last checked
May 25, 2026
Last changed
May 25, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
Individual instructors may determine whether the use of AI will be permitted, and to what extent, when it comes to assigned course work... improper or unauthorized use of AI can constitute academic misconduct.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
5668f134…
Retrieved
May 25, 2026
Evidence locator
Message to students from the Provost
Academic Integrity
Archer Library's student-facing GenAI guidance tells students to check whether they have permission to use AI in their program or coursework, follow assignment instructions, verify GenAI output accuracy, and cite GenAI in their work.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%
Normalized value: Library guidance frames acceptable GenAI use around permission, assignment instructions, accuracy checks, and citation.
Last checked
May 25, 2026
Last changed
May 25, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
These questions will guide you in determining whether or not use is acceptable: 1. Do you have permission to use AI in your program or course work? 2. Have you followed the assignment instructions? ... 4. Have you checked if the GenAI output is accurate? 5. Have you cited GenAI in your work?
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
b1121fb5…
Retrieved
May 25, 2026
Evidence locator
When can I use Generative AI?
Academic Integrity
Archer Library's GenAI citation guide says AI-generated materials should generally be treated as a non-recoverable source and/or akin to personal communication, while students should check with their instructor if in doubt about when to cite AI and which style to use.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence84%
Normalized value: Library citation guidance advises instructor confirmation and style-specific treatment for AI-generated materials.
Last checked
May 25, 2026
Last changed
May 25, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
In general, though, you should treat AI-generated materials as a non-recoverable source and/or akin to personal communication... As always, please be sure to check with your instructor if in doubt about when to cite AI and what style to use.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
2cd38ba0…
Retrieved
May 25, 2026
Evidence locator
Citing GenAI
Teaching 1 reviewed claim
Teaching
University of Regina CTL guidance for faculty and instructors recommends that instructors set clear GenAI rules and syllabus statements, require students to disclose AI use when incorporated into coursework, and protect student privacy and intellectual property in teaching uses of GenAI.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence89%
Normalized value: Faculty/instructor guidance recommends clear rules, disclosure, and privacy/IP protection for GenAI in coursework.
Last checked
May 25, 2026
Last changed
May 25, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
It is strongly recommended that instructors incorporate a statement on the use of generative AI into course syllabi... Instructors should require students to disclose when and how they've incorporated AI into their coursework... Instructors should also endeavour to protect the privacy and intellectual property of students in any use of generative AI in teaching.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
165d1213…
Retrieved
May 25, 2026
Evidence locator
How can instructors help to prevent the misuse of ChatGPT and other generative AI in academic work?
Privacy 1 reviewed claim
Privacy
University of Regina policy treats data used to develop, operate, share, manage, or record GenAI systems as institutional data that must align with the University's Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy policy and data handling standards.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%
Normalized value: GenAI project and system data is institutional data governed by privacy and data handling rules.
Last checked
May 25, 2026
Last changed
May 25, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
Data used to develop algorithms or GenAI systems, and any data generated, shared, managed and/or recorded as part of an GenAI system's operation or algorithm, will be considered institutional data and must be managed in alignment with GOV-060-005 Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy policy and the University's data handling standards.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
0bc7c384…
Retrieved
May 25, 2026
Evidence locator
Policy
Security Review 1 reviewed claim
Security Review
For GenAI projects or systems, University of Regina employees are directed to identify, assess, and analyze risks including privacy and security, and University-wide GenAI projects, tools, systems, or intended enterprise-data uses require approval through established IT project approval processes.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%
Normalized value: GenAI projects require risk assessment, and university-wide or enterprise-data GenAI uses require IT project approval.
Last checked
May 25, 2026
Last changed
May 25, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
Any employee who is considering a GenAI project or system must identify, assess and analyze risks and opportunities... including privacy and security. Any University-wide GenAI project, tool, system or intended use of enterprise-level data requires approval through established IT project approval processes.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
0bc7c384…
Retrieved
May 25, 2026
Evidence locator
Processes
AI tool use 2 reviewed claims
Ai Tool Treatment
University of Regina policy OPS-080-050 says all University use of generative AI must be ethical, reliable, transparent, secure, and compliant with applicable laws and regulations; the policy primarily addresses governance and operations uses by employees.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%
Normalized value: Formal GenAI operations policy for employee governance and operations use.
Last checked
May 25, 2026
Last changed
May 25, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
This policy applies to the development, approval, use and management of GenAI software, systems, or platforms that may be used by University of Regina employees... All University use of GenAI must be ethical, reliable, transparent, secure and compliant with applicable laws and regulations.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
0bc7c384…
Retrieved
May 25, 2026
Evidence locator
Introduction; Policy
Ai Tool Treatment
University of Regina CTL guidance says Turnitin is the only institutionally adopted plagiarism- and AI-detection tool, the AI-detection report is not conclusive proof of academic misconduct, and instructors are not permitted to use non-approved tools for AI detection.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%
Normalized value: Turnitin is the institutionally adopted AI-detection tool; non-approved AI-detection tools are not permitted.
Last checked
May 25, 2026
Last changed
May 25, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
Due to the unreliability of AI-detection tools, and the possibility of false positives, the AI-detection report cannot be considered conclusive proof of academic misconduct... Turnitin is presently the only institutionally adopted plagiarism- and AI-detection tool and... instructors are not permitted to use non-approved tools for the purpose of AI-detection.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
165d1213…
Retrieved
May 25, 2026
Evidence locator
Can/should instructors use tools to detect AI-generated content?
Source record
Official sources
5 sources
5 official URLs; 5 source attributions and their captured versions retained.
Academic Integrity and Artificial Intelligence
www.uregina.ca
University official source
uregina.ca
Hash and captured version
Academic Integrity and Artificial Intelligence · 2026-05-25T06:24:18.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Regina AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 25, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-regina
Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.
Saved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.
Questions students ask
Questions students ask
Can I use AI for my coursework?
University of Regina has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
