Diferencias de la versión
University of California, Berkeley (UCB)
Diferencia del seguimiento unificado para public-release-20260523-001. El texto completo de la página fuente no se publica; se muestran fragmentos cortos de pruebas en el idioma original para el contexto de la cita.
Diferencia unificada
Cambios en el seguimiento de versión a versión generados desde instantáneas públicas de lanzamientos.
Universidad of California, Berkeley (UCB) public-release-20260523-001 diferencias
Lanzamiento inicial con seguimiento.
+54-0
11 # University of California, Berkeley (UCB) AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+other: UC Berkeley's Office of Ethics, Risk and Compliance provides centralized resources and guidance on the ethical and appropriate use of artificial intelligence, specifically generative AI, with a focus on privacy and compliance with existing laws and policies.
5+Evidence (en, 5c102cb9aa4f): The Office of Ethics, Risk and Compliance is providing resources and guidance about how to use artificial intelligence (AI), specifically generative AI, in an ethical and appropriate manner. This page will help guide you to available tools with a focus on privacy and compliance with existing laws and policies.
46 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
57 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
8+other: UC Berkeley warns that individuals who accept click-through agreements for AI tools (such as OpenAI and ChatGPT terms of use) without delegated signature authority may face personal liability, including responsibility for compliance with terms and conditions.
9+Evidence (en, 53fb3a36f07d): Certain generative AI tools use click-through agreements. Click-through agreements, including OpenAI and ChatGPT terms of use, are contracts. Individuals who accept click-through agreements without delegated signature authority may face personal consequences, including responsibility for compliance with terms and conditions.
610 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
711 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
12+other: UC Berkeley requires researchers to comply with varying license agreement terms before using or training AI tools with materials acquired from library-licensed resources or databases. Violations can result in personal liability and campus-wide loss of access to critical research resources.
13+Evidence (en, 53fb3a36f07d): Before using or training AI tools with materials acquired from Library-licensed resources or databases, researchers must comply with varying license agreement terms. Violations can result in personal liability and campus-wide loss of access to critical research resources.
814 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
915 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
16+other: UC Berkeley states that use of generative AI tools should be consistent with UC Berkeley's Principles of Community and the UC Principles of Responsible AI.
17+Evidence (en, 53fb3a36f07d): In all cases, use should be consistent with UC Berkeley's Principles of Community and the UC Principles of Responsible AI.
1018 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1119 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
20+other: UC Berkeley states that units offering AI tools separately from campus or systemwide agreements should clearly advise staff and users of the appropriate use and Protection Level limitations of those tools.
21+Evidence (en, 53fb3a36f07d): Units offering such tools should clearly advise staff and users as to the appropriate use and Protection Level limitations of the AI (and all) tools that they offer. Units are encouraged to use and refer people to the campus Data Classification Standard and Guidelines for assistance with determining the Protection Level of data being contemplated for use in unit-provided AI tools.
1222 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1323 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
24+other: UC Berkeley offers an 'AI Essentials' training for employees — a approximately 30-minute course covering foundational AI concepts, UC policies regarding AI tool usage, and opportunities for application in higher education.
25+Evidence (en, 2bf26ddd14aa): UC Berkeley AI Essentials — ~30-minute employee training covering foundational AI concepts, UC policies regarding the usage of AI tools, and opportunities for application in higher ed. Authentication required.
1426 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1527 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
28+other: The UC Berkeley Academic Senate recommends that all faculty include a clear statement on their syllabus about course expectations regarding the use of Google Gemini or any other generative AI tool for course-related work. In the absence of such a statement, students may be more likely to use these technologies inappropriately.
29+Evidence (en, c6786c351541): We recommend that all faculty include a clear statement on their syllabus about course expectations regarding the use of Google Gemini or any other GenAI tool for course-related work. In the absence of such a statement, students may be more likely to use these technologies inappropriately or fail to utilize them effectively as a learning tool.
1630 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1731 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
32+other: The UC Berkeley Academic Senate states that generative AI detection tools are increasingly less accurate and that there are no validated generative AI detection tools available.
33+Evidence (en, c6786c351541): GenAI detection tools are increasingly less accurate; there are no validated GenAI detection tools.
1834 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1935 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
36+other: The UC Berkeley Academic Senate provides three sample syllabus statement frameworks for faculty: 'Full AI' (GenAI required), 'Some AI' (limited permitted use with restrictions), and 'No AI' (all GenAI use prohibited). Faculty should modify these to fit their course requirements.
37+Evidence (en, c6786c351541): We provide three sample statements. Instructors should modify them to fit their course requirements. The three statements include the two extremes, with the most and least GenAI use. We also include a third option that is approximately in the middle between the two.
2038 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
2139 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
40+other: The UC Berkeley Academic Senate recommends that for assignments where GenAI is not permitted, instructors should adopt enforcement mechanisms such as in-person proctored exams, an additional oral exam component, or a written statement of academic integrity, since no validated GenAI detection tools exist.
41+Evidence (en, c6786c351541): GenAI detection tools are increasingly less accurate; there are no validated GenAI detection tools. Therefore, assignments or learning activities where GenAI is not permitted should consider adopting one or more of the following solutions: Written Statement of Academic Integrity; In-person proctored exams/activities; An additional interview component (or oral exam) to an assignment where students are graded on an explanation of their work.
2242 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
2343 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
44+other: The UC Berkeley Academic Senate's 'Some AI' syllabus framework requires students to include an acknowledgement of their use of any generative AI system in submitted work, along with the prompts used and how the output was utilized.
45+Evidence (en, c6786c351541): When assignments in the course permit or incorporate the use of GenAI tools, the assignment will ask you to include an acknowledgement of your use of any type of GenAI in your submitted work and share the prompts and outputs utilized at the time of submission. The suggested format is as follows: I acknowledge the use of [insert AI system(s) and link] to [specific use of GenAI]. The prompts used include [list of prompts]. The output from these prompts was used to [explain the use].
2446 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
2547 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
48+other: At UC Berkeley, publicly-available information classified as Protection Level P1 may be freely used in generative AI tools.
49+Evidence (en, 53fb3a36f07d): Publicly-available information (Protection Level P1) can be used in generative AI tools.
2650 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
2751 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
52+other: The UC Berkeley Academic Senate advises that for assignments where instructors encourage or require GenAI tools, instructors must ensure students have access to the necessary computing resources. If non-campus-sanctioned resources are required, the instructor is responsible for providing access.
53+Evidence (en, c6786c351541): For any assignments where the instructor encourages or requires the use of GenAI tools, instructors should ensure that students have access to the necessary computing resources to run those GenAI tools. If non-campus-sanctioned resources are required, it is the instructor's responsibility to provide access to those resources.
2854 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
2955 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
56+other: The University of California system has established Responsible AI Principles comprising eight principles: Appropriateness; Transparency; Accuracy, Reliability and Safety; Fairness and Non-Discrimination; Privacy and Security; Human Values; Shared Benefit and Prosperity; and Accountability.
57+Evidence (en, fe63cb6b7f43): UC has several AI principles: Appropriateness; Transparency; Accuracy, Reliability and Safety; Fairness and Non-Discrimination; Privacy and Security; Human Values; Shared Benefit and Prosperity; and Accountability.
3058 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
3159 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
60+other: UC Berkeley has AI risk assessment pre-screening questions that employees can use to gauge the level of risk involved for an AI use case where AI is integrated into a product, service, or feature at the university. Depending on the risk level determined, the CERC-AIR subcommittee may be engaged for a broader risk assessment.
61+Evidence (en, fe63cb6b7f43): UC Berkeley also has AI risk assessment pre-screening questions that can be used by employees to gauge the level of risk involved for an AI use case (whereby AI is integrated into a product, service or feature at the university). Depending on the level of risk determined, a subcommittee may be engaged and the broader risk assessment conducted.
3262 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
3363 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
64+other: UC Berkeley requires users to use UC-licensed AI tools rather than individual consumer accounts to benefit from UC's contractual data protections when working with information more sensitive than Protection Level P1.
65+Evidence (en, 53fb3a36f07d): UC has license agreements for certain AI tools, which provide protection for use with more sensitive information. It is important to be sure you are using licensed tools, rather than individual consumer accounts, to benefit from UC's contractual protections.
3466 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
3567 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
68+other: At UC Berkeley, AI tools procured by individual units must adhere to the approved Protection Level limitations advised by that unit, and units should clearly advise staff and users of the appropriate use and Protection Level limitations of their AI tools.
69+Evidence (en, 53fb3a36f07d): Use of AI tools procured by units separately from the campus or systemwide agreements mentioned above must also adhere to the approved Protection Level limitations advised by the unit to ensure compliance with the agreement and appropriate protections relative to the safety features of the tool. Units offering such tools should clearly advise staff and users as to the appropriate use and Protection Level limitations of the AI (and all) tools that they offer.
3670 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
3771 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
72+other: UC Berkeley prohibits the use of generative AI tools to complete academic work in a manner not allowed by the instructor.
73+Evidence (en, 53fb3a36f07d): Completion of academic work in a manner not allowed by the instructor.
3874 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
3975 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
76+other: UC Berkeley prohibits entering personal, confidential, proprietary, or otherwise sensitive information classified as Protection Level P2, P3, or P4 into generative AI tools, unless specifically allowed under UC's negotiated contracts with AI providers.
77+Evidence (en, 53fb3a36f07d): Unless specifically stated in the 'Allowable Use' section above, no personal, confidential, proprietary, or otherwise sensitive information may be entered into or generated as output from models or prompts. Such information includes: Student records subject to FERPA, Non-public instructional materials, Proprietary or unpublished research, Any other information classified as Protection Level P2, P3, or P4 (unless specifically allowed under UC's contracts).
4078 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
4179 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
80+other: UC Berkeley prohibits entering FERPA-protected student records, non-public instructional materials, and proprietary or unpublished research into generative AI tools.
81+Evidence (en, 53fb3a36f07d): Such information includes: Student records subject to FERPA; Non-public instructional materials; Proprietary or unpublished research.
4282 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
4383 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
84+other: UC Berkeley requires that any new use of generative AI in studies or work must receive approval from the instructor or responsible unit head, and users should complete the AI Essentials Training and consult the CERC-AIR committee.
85+Evidence (en, 53fb3a36f07d): If you are considering a new use of Generative AI in your studies or work, it is your responsibility to consider the ethics and risks involved and obtain approval from your instructor/responsible unit head. Be sure to take the AI Essentials Training and consult CERC-AIR, a committee that assesses and offers guidance for mitigating AI risks.
4486 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
4587 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
88+other: UC Berkeley warns that AI use involving highly-consequential automated decision-making requires extreme caution and should not be employed without prior consultation with appropriate campus entities including the responsible unit head. Examples include legal analysis, recruitment/personnel decisions, replacing represented employees, facial recognition security tools, and grading or assessment of student work.
89+Evidence (en, 53fb3a36f07d): Use of AI that involves highly-consequential automated decision-making requires extreme caution, and should not be employed without prior consultation with appropriate campus entities, including the responsible Unit head, as such use could put the University and individuals as significant risk. Examples include, but are not limited to: Legal analysis or advice; Recruitment, personnel, or disciplinary decision-making; Seeking to replace work currently done by represented employees; Security tools using facial recognition; Grading or assessment of student work.
4690 ## Source attribution added
4791 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
92+Source https://academic-senate.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/genai_guidance_for_instructors_2025.pdf snapshot c6786c3515412e68fd1dbf47435e92fe1b5fed2fccb8e2d0e73b2fb44ea3ff9b
93+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T04:55:45Z
4894 ## Source attribution added
4995 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
96+Source https://ai.berkeley.edu/guidance-use-ai snapshot 2bf26ddd14aad49a54c68a5cc18bca60e80b2299496a508d8d24a1846dbeaa37
97+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T04:55:45Z
5098 ## Source attribution added
5199 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
100+Source https://oercs.berkeley.edu/appropriate-use-generative-ai-tools snapshot 53fb3a36f07d32da35583cf1daae65c4be93b999fd5fb8804fe292d571dd5076
101+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T04:55:45Z
52102 ## Source attribution added
53103 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
104+Source https://oercs.berkeley.edu/artificial-intelligence snapshot 5c102cb9aa4fc0297302db4905d56a4b2b4bb279703db075a3cbedd4a025c4dc
105+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T04:55:45Z
54106 ## Source attribution added
55107 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
108+Source https://re-ai.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/responsible_use_of_generative_ai_uc_berkeley_2025.pdf snapshot fe63cb6b7f4325b31394cfb5c0f6a26ffdd6eb32d5c71b2e0c1a22537c83d6c3
109+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-06T04:55:45Z
Cómo leer esta diferencia
Metadatos de la versión del rastreador, no prueba directa del momento de publicación universitaria.
Las afirmaciones extraídas recientemente son adiciones al seguimiento y no necesariamente han sido publicadas por la universidad. Los cambios en las instantáneas de origen significan que la misma URL produjo un hash diferente; esto puede deberse al texto de la política, el diseño, la navegación o los metadatos.
Límite
Solo metadatos del rastreador
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.