Record revision, scope and original evidence
Original evidence and audience, course and unit scopes are preserved. Tracker correction time is not a policy effective date.
The records below reflect this historical version, not the current policy record or current review conclusions.
484926940e308abda85c9633090dc99b70e1883716387161db0220b4c7130a96
{
"addedClaimIds": [],
"updatedClaimIds": [],
"heldClaimIds": []
}Previous baseline and review records- cl-brown-university-gemini-316 — Google Gemini Chat is listed for Brown University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
- cl-brown-university-notebooklm-317 — NotebookLM is listed for Brown University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
- cl-brown-004 — Brown OIT guidance says users should not enter Level 2 or 3 Brown data into publicly available or vendor-enabled AI tools unless Brown has a contract for a specific service that protects the data.
- cl-brown-006 — Brown OIT guidance says Google Gemini Chat and NotebookLM are accessible at no cost to Brown and can be used with data classified as Risk Level 3, unlike consumer AI services named on the page with which Brown does not have agreements.
- cl-brown-002 — Brown Provost guidance says any unapproved use of AI to complete assignments would be covered by Brown’s Academic Code and Graduate Student Edition Academic Code.
- cl-brown-001 — Brown University Provost guidance says the University is not prescribing specific AI policies, and that faculty should give clear, unambiguous information about what AI use is and is not allowed in their courses.
- cl-brown-007 — Brown OIT guidance says Gemini and NotebookLM are optional tools available to Brown students, Brown staff, Brown-paid faculty, and Brown clinical/medical faculty.
- cl-brown-003 — Brown Sheridan Center guidance says instructors should be explicit with students about expectations for generative AI use, including how students should, might, or cannot engage with it.
- cl-brown-009 — Brown OIT research guidance says researchers should deeply review AI-generated code for quality and efficiency.
- cl-brown-005 — Brown OIT guidance says AI tool use is subject to the same policies as other information technology resources, including acceptable use, copyright, conduct, and contract review policies.
- cl-brown-008 — Brown University Communications guidance for Brown communicators says not to input identifying personal information or proprietary information into AI tools.
Institution-wide evidence audit remains PARTIAL. Supplementary quotations are not independently verified by this presentation release.
Current JSON and MCP retain the previous public Claim set. Local candidate corrections and held decisions remain private and pending review.
Source excerpts retain their declared capture limitations. Original official HTTP/PDF bytes were not verified by this release.
Institutional semantic audit remains PARTIAL. Student-facing display is derived from existing published Claims; no new institutional tool record, source verification or strong snapshot approval.