Bu kayıt güncellemesi ne anlama geliyor
Yapılandırılmış kayıt özeti
İlgili kayıtlar: 16 (15 düzeltildi / ayarlandı · 1 eklendi)
Yapay Zekâ Aracı Muamelesi · Diğer kayıtlar · 3 konu daha
Bu revizyon için henüz bağımsız olarak incelenmiş bir özet yok.
Bu, tarihsel bir kayıt özetidir; güncel bir iznin veya yeni bir üniversite kuralının teyidi değildir.
Akademik dürüstlük · İlgili kayıtlar: 7 (7 düzeltildi / ayarlandı)
Site düzeltmesi
Site sonuç metni değişiklikleri
−Eski metinStaff setting summative assessment must: declare whether/how students can use AI; review assessment design for alignment with permitted AI use; ensure equality of baseline AI tool provision where authorised; specify declaration forms for student AI use; only identify suspected unauthorised AI use through marking or university-endorsed detection tools (none currently endorsed); and handle misconduct under usual disciplinary regulations.
+Yeni metinStaff setting summative assessment must: declare whether/how students can use AI; review assessment design for alignment with permitted AI use; ensure equality of baseline AI tool provision where authorised; specify declaration forms for student AI use; only identify suspected unauthorised AI use through marking or university-endorsed detection tools (the public page says none had received endorsement at its last update); and handle misconduct under usual disciplinary regulations.
Site düzeltmesi
Karşılaştırılabilir eski ve yeni metin mevcut değil.
Eski metinStudents undertaking summative assessment must: complete assessment in line with the AI use declaration for each assignment; acknowledge their AI use via a formal declaration in the prescribed format; and understand that submitting work breaching AI specifications constitutes cheating and may constitute plagiarism, handled under usual disciplinary regulations.
Yeni metinStudents undertaking summative assessment must: complete assessment in line with the AI use declaration for each assignment; acknowledge their AI use via a formal declaration in the prescribed format; and understand that submitting work breaching AI specifications constitutes cheating and may constitute plagiarism, handled under usual disciplinary regulations.
Site düzeltmesi
Site sonuç metni değişiklikleri
−Eski metinOxford requires postgraduate research students to include a statement on their use of generative AI in their final thesis submission.
+Yeni metinMPLS guidance for DPhil and MSc by Research summative assessment requires a statement on GenAI use in the final thesis for submissions from Trinity Term 2026. The statement goes immediately after the abstract and covers compliance, uses and referencing. This is MPLS guidance, not proof of an identical rule in every division.
Site düzeltmesi
Site sonuç metni değişiklikleri
−Eski metinFor PGR summative assessment (transfer, confirmation, thesis), the following AI uses are permitted without declaration: local editing tools (grammar assistants, spell-checkers, code debuggers making small local changes); AI for background research, language translation, bibliography creation, and general subject understanding; and AI for coding where coding serves a research purpose but is not the substantive output. Students remain responsible for correctness of any code used.
+Yeni metinFor MPLS postgraduate research summative assessment, local editing and debugging tools are permitted without declaration. Background research, translation, bibliography indexes and general understanding are allowed without declaration. AI coding is permitted when it serves a research purpose and is not the substantive project output; students remain responsible for correctness and should declare AI-generated code, excluding debugging.
Site düzeltmesi
Site sonuç metni değişiklikleri
−Eski metinFor PGR students, the following uses of generative AI are not permitted in summative assessments: substantive original writing by GenAI (verbatim or closely paraphrased for chapters or parts thereof) which constitutes plagiarism; using AI to produce plots or data visualisations directly from prompts; and entering private or confidential data into third-party AI tools.
+Yeni metinMPLS postgraduate research guidance prohibits substantive AI-written thesis content, including close paraphrases, and producing plots or data visualisations directly from prompts. It distinguishes refining plotting code from generating research results. Confidential/private data use remains subject to applicable University data rules and approved institutional services.
Site düzeltmesi
Site sonuç metni değişiklikleri
−Eski metinUnauthorised use of generative AI falls under the University's plagiarism regulations and is subject to academic penalties in summative assessments. Students must learn and practise academic skills of note-taking and clear attribution to differentiate their own work from AI-derived material. Where AI use is authorised, students should give clear acknowledgment of how it has been used.
+Yeni metinOxford’s public summative-assessment policy says work breaching the assignment’s AI specifications constitutes cheating and may constitute plagiarism; suspected misuse is handled under usual disciplinary regulations and processes. It does not establish an AI-specific penalty.
Site düzeltmesi
Karşılaştırılabilir eski ve yeni metin mevcut değil.
Eski metinThe University's policy on AI use in summative assessment is based on three principles endorsed by Education Committee in Trinity term 2025: (1) educational practice must be grounded in values of integrity, honesty and transparency, which must be clearly articulated and frequently discussed; (2) every discrete unit of assessment must be carefully designed to be fit for its specific purposes, clearly articulated to students; (3) every summative assessment must be accompanied by a clear explanation of what appropriate assistance is permitted and what is forbidden, specifying how students should report assistance received.
Yeni metinThe University's policy on AI use in summative assessment is based on three principles endorsed by Education Committee in Trinity term 2025: (1) educational practice must be grounded in values of integrity, honesty and transparency, which must be clearly articulated and frequently discussed; (2) every discrete unit of assessment must be carefully designed to be fit for its specific purposes, clearly articulated to students; (3) every summative assessment must be accompanied by a clear explanation of what appropriate assistance is permitted and what is forbidden, specifying how students should report assistance received.
Araştırma · İlgili kayıtlar: 1 (1 eklendi)
Kayıt ekleme
Eklendi
+Oxford’s research policy says users of a discrete GenAI tool should declare substantive use in their work. Where relevant they must make prompts and outputs available under open research principles. Its scope defines exclusions for certain assistance tasks; assessment research must also meet summative-assessment rules.
Yapay Zekâ Aracı Muamelesi · İlgili kayıtlar: 4 (4 düzeltildi / ayarlandı)
Site düzeltmesi
Site sonuç metni değişiklikleri
−Eski metinChatGPT Edu is listed for University of Oxford in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.
+Yeni metinOxford’s public AI Competency Centre tool guide lists ChatGPT Edu as a University SSO platform with a Confidential TPSA rating. Standard access is listed as free; Microsoft 365 Copilot and Google Gemini Pro are separate paid products. The guide has moved to OxIntranet and is no longer maintained; check successor guidance for current terms. Tool access is not assessment permission.
Site düzeltmesi
Site sonuç metni değişiklikleri
−Eski metinCodex is listed for University of Oxford in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.
+Yeni metinOxford’s public AI Competency Centre tool guide lists Codex as a University SSO platform with a Confidential TPSA rating. Standard access is listed as free; Microsoft 365 Copilot and Google Gemini Pro are separate paid products. The guide has moved to OxIntranet and is no longer maintained; check successor guidance for current terms. Tool access is not assessment permission.
Site düzeltmesi
Site sonuç metni değişiklikleri
−Eski metinGoogle Gemini is listed for University of Oxford in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.
+Yeni metinOxford’s public AI Competency Centre tool guide lists Google Gemini as a University SSO platform with a Confidential TPSA rating. Standard access is listed as free; Microsoft 365 Copilot and Google Gemini Pro are separate paid products. The guide has moved to OxIntranet and is no longer maintained; check successor guidance for current terms. Tool access is not assessment permission.
Site düzeltmesi
Site sonuç metni değişiklikleri
−Eski metinMicrosoft Copilot Chat is listed for University of Oxford in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.
+Yeni metinOxford’s public AI Competency Centre tool guide lists Microsoft Copilot Chat as a University SSO platform with a Confidential TPSA rating. Standard access is listed as free; Microsoft 365 Copilot and Google Gemini Pro are separate paid products. The guide has moved to OxIntranet and is no longer maintained; check successor guidance for current terms. Tool access is not assessment permission.
Kaynak Durumu · İlgili kayıtlar: 3 (3 düzeltildi / ayarlandı)
Site düzeltmesi
Site sonuç metni değişiklikleri
−Eski metinExternal custom GPTs should not be used to process confidential University data or sensitive personal data. No non-public University data (including confidential, internal, or personal data) may be incorporated in any custom GPT shared with external users.
+Yeni metinThe former Oxford public Information Security URL cited for external custom GPT use now says the content has moved. The earlier recorded guidance is historical and is not current approval or prohibition. Consult successor Cyber Security/OxIntranet guidance; current detailed conditions could not be independently retrieved.
Site düzeltmesi
Site sonuç metni değişiklikleri
−Eski metinAll cloud-based generative AI tools must be subject to a security risk assessment before being used with University information. Free and open-source services generally cannot complete a full assessment and should not be used for confidential information.
+Yeni metinThe former Oxford public Information Security URL cited for cloud-AI security assessment now says the content has moved. The earlier recorded guidance is historical and is not current approval or prohibition. Consult successor Cyber Security/OxIntranet guidance; current detailed conditions could not be independently retrieved.
Site düzeltmesi
Site sonuç metni değişiklikleri
−Eski metinUnapproved AI transcription bots should not be used in Teams meetings. The inbuilt Teams Transcription facility or Microsoft Copilot may be used subject to appropriate data protection considerations. Other AI transcription bot services should be avoided, and meeting organisers should set options to prevent participants from adding unapproved transcription bots.
+Yeni metinThe former Oxford public Information Security URL cited for AI transcription bots now says the content has moved. The earlier recorded guidance is historical and is not current approval or prohibition. Consult successor Cyber Security/OxIntranet guidance; current detailed conditions could not be independently retrieved.
Diğer kayıtlar · İlgili kayıtlar: 1 (1 düzeltildi / ayarlandı)
Site düzeltmesi
Site sonuç metni değişiklikleri
−Eski metinChatGPT Edu and Google Gemini, when licensed via the AI Competency Centre, have been approved for processing of Confidential University data by the Information Security team. University data processed through these licensed platforms will not be used to train AI models. Confidential data must only be used with the University's approved, SSO-protected platforms.
+Yeni metinThe public Oxford AI Competency Centre guide lists ChatGPT Edu, Codex, Google Gemini and Microsoft Copilot Chat with Confidential TPSA ratings and University SSO. It now states that the public guide is no longer maintained and points to successor University guidance. This does not approve GitHub Copilot or personal consumer accounts.
Resmi kaynaklar · Kaynak kontrolü
Kaynak kontrolü
Karşılaştırılabilir eski ve yeni metin mevcut değil.
Kaynak kontrolü
Karşılaştırılabilir eski ve yeni metin mevcut değil.
Kaynak kontrolü
Karşılaştırılabilir eski ve yeni metin mevcut değil.
Kaynak kontrolü
Karşılaştırılabilir eski ve yeni metin mevcut değil.
Kaynak kontrolü
Karşılaştırılabilir eski ve yeni metin mevcut değil.
Kaynak kontrolü
Karşılaştırılabilir eski ve yeni metin mevcut değil.
Kaynak kontrolü
Karşılaştırılabilir eski ve yeni metin mevcut değil.
Kaynak kontrolü
Karşılaştırılabilir eski ve yeni metin mevcut değil.
Kaynak kontrolü
Karşılaştırılabilir eski ve yeni metin mevcut değil.