University of Vermont

UVM's Code of Academic Integrity states that work generated by artificial intelligence is not considered created by the student and is not permitted unless the instructor expressly states otherwise.

UVM's Code of Academic Integrity says course expectations may vary by instructor and students must understand expectations for each assignment and course.

UVM Libraries' student guide tells students to have a plan for giving credit when using generative AI and notes that APA, MLA, and Chicago have guidelines for citing generative AI.

UVM's faculty AI guidance says there is not a mandated one-size-fits-all classroom AI approach and tells faculty to clearly communicate how their AI stance shapes course policies and assignments.

UVM's approved AI tools page says approved AI applications are approved by data risk level, and a tool approved for one risk level is not approved for higher-risk data.

UVM's approved AI tools page lists general AI tools such as ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini as public-information-only unless another use case goes through Contract Review.

UVM Graduate College AI guidance tells graduate researchers not to share confidential, proprietary, or IP-sensitive data or information with an open-source AI engine.

UVM Graduate College AI guidance says students should seek guidance on AI platform use in class assignments, theses, dissertations, and other academic or professional writing.

UVM's student AI guidance tells students that the key course-context question is what the instructor has said about AI use, and that students should check syllabi and assignment instructions.

UVM Libraries' student guide states that UVM does not currently have a policy on ChatGPT, while instructors may have assignment-specific policies on how ChatGPT may or may not be used.