이 기록 업데이트의 의미
구조화된 기록 개요
관련 기록: 26 (12개 정정/조정됨 · 14개 추가됨)
AI 도구 처리 · 교수 활동 · 주제 4개 더 보기
이 개정에 대해 독립적으로 검토된 요약이 아직 없습니다.
이는 과거 기록 요약이며, 현재 허용 여부나 새로운 대학 규정을 확인하는 것이 아닙니다.
학문적 진실성 · 관련 기록: 9 (2개 정정/조정됨 · 7개 추가됨)
기록 추가
추가됨
+The SAP decision is Monash’s final internal decision; Student Complaints Policy or University Student Ombudsman Policy cannot dispute that discipline outcome. External review avenues include the Victorian or National Student Ombudsman. Under§7.6.2, Malaysia students may appeal in writing to the Malaysian Registrar General of Private Higher Educational Institutions within14days of RECEIPT of the SAP decision. This external deadline is distinct from the internal20workingday notice-date deadline.
기록 추가
추가됨
+Monash internal appeals must meet the grounds in§5.2 (bias subject to the prior-objection limitation, potentially material procedural unfairness, excessive penalty, materially relevant new evidence not reasonably available, or an unreasonable decision on the evidence). Under§5.3, written grounds go to the University Registrar within20workingdays from the notice date, subject to extraordinary circumstances. Admitted misconduct permits appeal of penalty only.
기록 추가
추가됨
+Under§5.5, Responsible Officer or SMP suspension/exclusion should not be enforced until the appeal is determined or its filing period expires, unless extenuating circumstances relate to wellbeing or community welfare. This is not a universal stay of all penalties.
기록 추가
추가됨
+When artificial intelligence is permitted in an assessment task and a student completes the task without using AI tools, university guidelines require the student to explicitly submit an acknowledgment of non-use.
기록 추가
추가됨
+No commercial AI detection tools have been approved by eSolutions or the University Data Protection and Privacy Office, and AI detectors absolutely cannot be used as evidence for reporting student breaches of assessment conditions. Text-based assignments remain subject to similarity-detection systems (Turnitin/MOSS) under Student Academic Integrity Procedure §2.7, where markers must apply academic judgement rather than relying on raw scores.
기록 추가
추가됨
+Under Student Academic Integrity Procedure V4.1 §4.6, unless otherwise stated in the LMS, students can have another person or entity proofread their work limited strictly to identifying errors and suggesting spelling/grammar corrections, but not rewriting text, changing words, reformatting, adding material, or checking calculations/formulas. Specific assessment prohibitions in Moodle override this default proofreading permission.
기록 추가
추가됨
+Under Student Academic Integrity Procedure, minor, trivial or frivolous breaches due to inappropriate academic practice receive the educative response in §6.1: the Chief Examiner/RO/nominee provides support and a written warning outcome, and awards a mark reflecting the practice without imposing a penalty (§6.1.1). For alleged misconduct, where evidence was not provided with the notice of allegation, students must have a reasonable opportunity of not less than five working days to respond to the allegation and evidence before RO determination (§8.3). Invited students may bring a support person who cannot represent or advocate; at Monash Malaysia a staff member or student may represent them (§8.4). Under §11.1, a finding and penalty, or penalty alone, may be appealed; students who admitted the misconduct may appeal only the penalty. The Hearing and Appeals Panels Procedure governs that process. At Malaysia, §11.2 separately permits a written appeal to the Malaysian Registrar General within 14 days of receiving the decision. Where an academic misconduct allegation occurs WITH a research misconduct allegation, §7.6 instead refers the matter to the research-misconduct RO and this coursework procedure does not investigate or determine it.
사이트 수정
사이트 결론 텍스트 변경
−이전 텍스트When allowed or required to use AI in an assessment, students must follow all instructions and restrictions on its use, clearly document the type of AI used and how it contributed, and provide written acknowledgment of the use of AI and its extent.
+새 텍스트Whenever AI is allowed or required in an assessment, students must follow task instructions/restrictions, document the type of AI and its contribution, and provide written acknowledgement of use and extent. When necessary, cite and reference using the closest source types in the required style.
사이트 수정
사이트 결론 텍스트 변경
−이전 텍스트Using AI in a way not permitted in an assessment, or failing to acknowledge its use correctly, may breach assessment conditions under the Student Academic Integrity Procedure.
+새 텍스트Using AI in a way not permitted in an assessment or failing to acknowledge its use correctly breaches assessment conditions under Student Academic Integrity Procedure V4.1 §4.7.
교수 활동 · 관련 기록: 6 (2개 정정/조정됨 · 4개 추가됨)
기록 추가
추가됨
+No AI detection tools have been approved by eSolutions or the University Data Protection and Privacy Office, and AI detectors absolutely cannot be used as evidence for reporting a student for suspected breach of assessment conditions. Staff marking assessments must submit text work through similarity-detection systems (Turnitin/MOSS) under Student Academic Integrity Procedure §2.7 and must apply academic judgement rather than relying on raw scores.
기록 추가
추가됨
+Under Assessment Regime Procedure V12 §1.7–1.7.2, Chief Examiners must determine where and how generative AI can be used in a unit, an assessment task, or part of a task; all specifications must be published in the LMS before the teaching period or at least 4 weeks before assessment task details are made available to students (while Table 2 specifies a 4-week deadline before the assessment due date or timetable release), and educational reasoning must be stated when AI is disallowed.
기록 추가
추가됨
+Monash assessment tasks on Moodle must display one of four standard AI statements: (1) Without Any Limits (AI permitted broadly, with mandatory declaration, verification, and ownership); (2) Guided (AI permitted strictly as specified in assessment instructions); (3) Must Not Be Used (AI prohibited across brainstorming, drafting, coding, and proofreading); or (4) Not Applicable (non-assessed learning activities exempt from formal declarations).
기록 추가
추가됨
+Students sitting scheduled electronic examinations (eExams) must not use generative AI to generate content or materials unless specifically permitted by the Chief Examiner and displayed on the eExam landing page. In closed book and open book (not open access) assessments, online spell check, grammar, and translation tools are strictly prohibited.
사이트 수정
사이트 결론 텍스트 변경
−이전 텍스트Chief Examiners have overarching responsibility for designing and setting assessment conditions, including communicating and verifying the responsible use of AI within assessment tasks.
+새 텍스트Under Assessment Regime Procedure V12 §1.7–1.7.2 and Table 2, Chief Examiners must determine where and how generative AI can be used in a unit or assessment task, clearly publish use specifications in the required LMS section before the teaching period or at least 4 weeks before task details are released (with Table 2 noting a 4-week deadline before the due date / timetable release), and provide educational reasoning when AI is disallowed.
사이트 수정
비교 가능한 이전 텍스트와 새 텍스트가 없습니다.
이전 텍스트Responsible use of AI should be explainable in terms of what AI was used, which AI tools assisted in producing the work, how many versions and drafts were produced, and how outputs were adapted.
새 텍스트Responsible use of AI should be explainable in terms of what AI was used, which AI tools assisted in producing the work, how many versions and drafts were produced, and how outputs were adapted.
개인정보 보호 · 관련 기록: 2 (2개 정정/조정됨)
사이트 수정
사이트 결론 텍스트 변경
−이전 텍스트Monash enterprise systems such as Copilot have enterprise data protections identified under the green shield in Monash Copilot. Students should use their Monash email address to access Microsoft Copilot which provides data protection for Monash.
+새 텍스트Students should use their Monash email address to access Microsoft Copilot (with commercial data protection under the green shield) or Google Gemini to ensure enterprise data protections apply; user prompts are protected and not used to train foundational AI models, but users must avoid uploading personal, sensitive, copyrighted, or confidential data.
사이트 수정
비교 가능한 이전 텍스트와 새 텍스트가 없습니다.
이전 텍스트Students should not upload personal, sensitive, copyrighted, or licensed material to AI tools, as many AI tools cannot guarantee privacy, strong data security, or the protection of intellectual property.
새 텍스트Students should not upload personal, sensitive, copyrighted, or licensed material to AI tools, as many AI tools cannot guarantee privacy, strong data security, or the protection of intellectual property.
보안 검토 · 관련 기록: 1 (1개 추가됨)
기록 추가
추가됨
+Under Artificial Intelligence Operations Procedure §1.3–1.3.1, using AI to assist in making a decision that could affect an individual's rights or interests (including student recruitment, admissions, assessment marking, and feedback) is permitted only where the decision is reviewed and finalised by an accountable Monash staff member, and can only be supported by Monash-procured AI systems.
연구 · 관련 기록: 2 (1개 정정/조정됨 · 1개 추가됨)
기록 추가
추가됨
+Higher Degree by Research (HDR) students should discuss with, and seek guidance from, their supervisors on any intended use of Generative AI and how to best acknowledge and cite its use in their work. Students are asked about Generative AI use in their research at each progress management review milestone and must confirm that use is consistent with Monash policies and guidance with due acknowledgement. Generative AI disclosure questions are included on the online thesis submission form, and thesis preliminary pages prompt candidates and supervisors to acknowledge Generative AI use.
사이트 수정
사이트 결론 텍스트 변경
−이전 텍스트Thesis examiners are not permitted to use Generative AI technologies (such as ChatGPT) during the thesis examination process to support, prepare, or write their examiners' report.
+새 텍스트To preserve the confidentiality of thesis examination, thesis examiners are not permitted to use Generative AI technologies (such as ChatGPT) during the thesis examination process to support, prepare, or write their examiners' report.
AI 도구 처리 · 관련 기록: 6 (5개 정정/조정됨 · 1개 추가됨)
사이트 수정
사이트 결론 텍스트 변경
−이전 텍스트Google Gemini is listed for Monash University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
+새 텍스트Google Gemini is available to Monash staff and students aged 18 and over via an institutional opt-in portal (aioptin.monash.edu) in the Google Education environment; access does not confer blanket assessment permission.
사이트 수정
사이트 결론 텍스트 변경
−이전 텍스트Microsoft Copilot is listed for Monash University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
+새 텍스트Microsoft Copilot is officially supported for all Monash students and staff with enterprise data protection; permissible coursework usage is determined strictly by assessment-specific Moodle instructions.
사이트 수정
사이트 결론 텍스트 변경
−이전 텍스트NotebookLM is listed for Monash University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
+새 텍스트NotebookLM (Gemini Notebook) is available to Monash students (18+) and staff through the Google Education environment via opt-in; it operates as a source-grounded assistant for user-provided materials and remains subject to assessment task rules.
기록 추가
추가됨
+Monash provides institutional access to Microsoft Copilot (with enterprise data protections upon logging in with Monash credentials) and opt-in access to Google Gemini and NotebookLM for students aged 18 and over via eSolutions. The university tool directory also references Zoom AI Companion among approved enterprise tools. However, institutional tool provision does not establish student assessment permission, which remains subject to Chief Examiner instructions in Moodle; specific student eligibility or restriction for other enterprise services is not established in the reviewed student policies.
사이트 수정
사이트 결론 텍스트 변경
−이전 텍스트Monash's AI responsible use principles include community benefit, education and research excellence, fairness, transparency, integrity and accountability, and data security and privacy.
+새 텍스트Monash's AI responsible use principles establish five institutional pillars: community benefit, education and research excellence; fairness; transparency; integrity and accountability; and data security and privacy.
사이트 수정
사이트 결론 텍스트 변경
−이전 텍스트Microsoft Copilot is a generative AI program that has capabilities to generate text and images in response to user prompts. Monash recommends logging in using Monash credentials to ensure data is more protected.
+새 텍스트Microsoft Copilot is available to Monash students and staff; logging in with Monash credentials provides enterprise commercial data protection where user data is not used to train AI models.
공식 출처 · 출처 확인
출처 확인
비교 가능한 이전 텍스트와 새 텍스트가 없습니다.
출처 확인
비교 가능한 이전 텍스트와 새 텍스트가 없습니다.
출처 확인
비교 가능한 이전 텍스트와 새 텍스트가 없습니다.
출처 확인
비교 가능한 이전 텍스트와 새 텍스트가 없습니다.
출처 확인
비교 가능한 이전 텍스트와 새 텍스트가 없습니다.
출처 확인
비교 가능한 이전 텍스트와 새 텍스트가 없습니다.
출처 확인
비교 가능한 이전 텍스트와 새 텍스트가 없습니다.
출처 확인
비교 가능한 이전 텍스트와 새 텍스트가 없습니다.
출처 확인
비교 가능한 이전 텍스트와 새 텍스트가 없습니다.
출처 확인
비교 가능한 이전 텍스트와 새 텍스트가 없습니다.
출처 확인
비교 가능한 이전 텍스트와 새 텍스트가 없습니다.
출처 확인
비교 가능한 이전 텍스트와 새 텍스트가 없습니다.
출처 확인
비교 가능한 이전 텍스트와 새 텍스트가 없습니다.
출처 확인
비교 가능한 이전 텍스트와 새 텍스트가 없습니다.
출처 확인
비교 가능한 이전 텍스트와 새 텍스트가 없습니다.
출처 확인
비교 가능한 이전 텍스트와 새 텍스트가 없습니다.
출처 확인
비교 가능한 이전 텍스트와 새 텍스트가 없습니다.
출처 확인
비교 가능한 이전 텍스트와 새 텍스트가 없습니다.
출처 확인
비교 가능한 이전 텍스트와 새 텍스트가 없습니다.