This policy specifically addresses the use of AI for Teaching, Research and Administration in the Department of HSS, IIT Bombay. The use of AI according to the strict demands of academic and professional integrity is the ultimate responsibility of the user/author/writer, whether one is faculty, researcher, student or staff. Human verification of the accuracy of AI content by the user of AI is mandatory in all cases of permissible use.
IIT Bombay's Department of Humanities and Social Sciences AI policy says it specifically addresses AI use for teaching, research, and administration in HSS; users are responsible for academic and professional integrity, and human verification of AI-content accuracy is mandatory for permissible use.
Explicit prior permission from the instructor or supervisor is mandatory for the use of AI, except for the use of basic functions like grammar and spell-check. For the latter, Institute subscribed and recommended (if any) AI platforms must be used. However, use of grammar and spell-checking tools must be acknowledged (see Point No.11).
The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy requires explicit prior permission from the instructor or supervisor for AI use, except for basic grammar and spell-check functions, and says grammar and spell-checking tools must be acknowledged.
Use of AI without human verification is not permissible for any task that involves evaluation or assessment of a student, staff or researcher, including (but not limited to) assessment of student submissions by faculty, of staff by Department functionaries, and screening of applications for admission, recruitment and promotion. AI detection tools (such as Turnitin) cannot be used as the sole criterion for disciplinary action without human verification.
The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy says AI use without human verification is not permissible for tasks involving evaluation or assessment of students, staff, or researchers, and AI detection tools cannot be the sole criterion for disciplinary action without human verification.
This policy specifically addresses the use of AI for Teaching, Research and Administration in the Department of HSS, IIT Bombay. The use of AI according to the strict demands of academic and professional integrity is the ultimate responsibility of the user/author/writer, whether one is faculty, researcher, student or staff. Human verification of the accuracy of AI content by the user of AI is mandatory in all cases of permissible use.
IIT Bombay's Department of Humanities and Social Sciences AI policy says it specifically addresses AI use for teaching, research, and administration in HSS; users are responsible for academic and professional integrity, and human verification of AI-content accuracy is mandatory for permissible use.
Explicit prior permission from the instructor or supervisor is mandatory for the use of AI, except for the use of basic functions like grammar and spell-check. For the latter, Institute subscribed and recommended (if any) AI platforms must be used. However, use of grammar and spell-checking tools must be acknowledged (see Point No.11).
The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy requires explicit prior permission from the instructor or supervisor for AI use, except for basic grammar and spell-check functions, and says grammar and spell-checking tools must be acknowledged.
Use of AI without human verification is not permissible for any task that involves evaluation or assessment of a student, staff or researcher, including (but not limited to) assessment of student submissions by faculty, of staff by Department functionaries, and screening of applications for admission, recruitment and promotion. AI detection tools (such as Turnitin) cannot be used as the sole criterion for disciplinary action without human verification.
The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy says AI use without human verification is not permissible for tasks involving evaluation or assessment of students, staff, or researchers, and AI detection tools cannot be the sole criterion for disciplinary action without human verification.
Explicit prior permission from the instructor or supervisor is mandatory for the use of AI, except for the use of basic functions like grammar and spell-check. For the latter, Institute subscribed and recommended (if any) AI platforms must be used. However, use of grammar and spell-checking tools must be acknowledged (see Point No.11).
The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy requires explicit prior permission from the instructor or supervisor for AI use, except for basic grammar and spell-check functions, and says grammar and spell-checking tools must be acknowledged.
Use of AI within permissible limits should be duly acknowledged with proper citation in all types of teaching materials and research outputs. Citation must include: (a) prompts used, (b) AI tools used, and (c) clear demarcation of the content/output generated by or with the aid of AI. Along with specific citations (see point No. 11), all dissertations and research reports submitted for evaluation in the Department of HSS must include a declaration of AI use/non-use by the student/researcher as per IIT Bombay requirement.
The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy says permissible AI use should be acknowledged with proper citation in teaching materials and research outputs, including prompts, AI tools used, and clear demarcation of AI-generated or AI-aided content; HSS dissertations and research reports submitted for evaluation must include an AI use or non-use declaration.
In the interest of intellectual property rights, privacy and confidentiality, we must not feed any information into AI platforms that must not be available in the public domain, including institutional and sensitive material. It is mandatory to abide by the regulations of the Institute Ethics Committee (IEC) or Review Board (IRB) regarding collection of data from human respondents for maintaining confidentiality, anonymity and consent requirements. Therefore, use of AI for transcription of interviews and survey data is not permissible. Any data containing personally identifiable information must not be uploaded in any platform, including AI platforms
The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy says users must not feed non-public, institutional, sensitive, or personally identifiable information into AI platforms, and it says AI transcription of interview and survey data is not permissible when confidentiality, anonymity, consent, or DPDP Act obligations would be affected.
This policy specifically addresses the use of AI for Teaching, Research and Administration in the Department of HSS, IIT Bombay. The use of AI according to the strict demands of academic and professional integrity is the ultimate responsibility of the user/author/writer, whether one is faculty, researcher, student or staff. Human verification of the accuracy of AI content by the user of AI is mandatory in all cases of permissible use.
IIT Bombay's Department of Humanities and Social Sciences AI policy says it specifically addresses AI use for teaching, research, and administration in HSS; users are responsible for academic and professional integrity, and human verification of AI-content accuracy is mandatory for permissible use.
In the interest of intellectual property rights, privacy and confidentiality, we must not feed any information into AI platforms that must not be available in the public domain, including institutional and sensitive material. It is mandatory to abide by the regulations of the Institute Ethics Committee (IEC) or Review Board (IRB) regarding collection of data from human respondents for maintaining confidentiality, anonymity and consent requirements. Therefore, use of AI for transcription of interviews and survey data is not permissible. Any data containing personally identifiable information must not be uploaded in any platform, including AI platforms
The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy says users must not feed non-public, institutional, sensitive, or personally identifiable information into AI platforms, and it says AI transcription of interview and survey data is not permissible when confidentiality, anonymity, consent, or DPDP Act obligations would be affected.
This policy specifically addresses the use of AI for Teaching, Research and Administration in the Department of HSS, IIT Bombay. The use of AI according to the strict demands of academic and professional integrity is the ultimate responsibility of the user/author/writer, whether one is faculty, researcher, student or staff. Human verification of the accuracy of AI content by the user of AI is mandatory in all cases of permissible use.
IIT Bombay's Department of Humanities and Social Sciences AI policy says it specifically addresses AI use for teaching, research, and administration in HSS; users are responsible for academic and professional integrity, and human verification of AI-content accuracy is mandatory for permissible use.
Use of AI without human verification is not permissible for any task that involves evaluation or assessment of a student, staff or researcher, including (but not limited to) assessment of student submissions by faculty, of staff by Department functionaries, and screening of applications for admission, recruitment and promotion. AI detection tools (such as Turnitin) cannot be used as the sole criterion for disciplinary action without human verification.
The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy says AI use without human verification is not permissible for tasks involving evaluation or assessment of students, staff, or researchers, and AI detection tools cannot be the sole criterion for disciplinary action without human verification.
Use of AI within permissible limits should be duly acknowledged with proper citation in all types of teaching materials and research outputs. Citation must include: (a) prompts used, (b) AI tools used, and (c) clear demarcation of the content/output generated by or with the aid of AI. Along with specific citations (see point No. 11), all dissertations and research reports submitted for evaluation in the Department of HSS must include a declaration of AI use/non-use by the student/researcher as per IIT Bombay requirement.
The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy says permissible AI use should be acknowledged with proper citation in teaching materials and research outputs, including prompts, AI tools used, and clear demarcation of AI-generated or AI-aided content; HSS dissertations and research reports submitted for evaluation must include an AI use or non-use declaration.
Explicit prior permission from the instructor or supervisor is mandatory for the use of AI, except for the use of basic functions like grammar and spell-check. For the latter, Institute subscribed and recommended (if any) AI platforms must be used. However, use of grammar and spell-checking tools must be acknowledged (see Point No.11).
The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy requires explicit prior permission from the instructor or supervisor for AI use, except for basic grammar and spell-check functions, and says grammar and spell-checking tools must be acknowledged.
This policy specifically addresses the use of AI for Teaching, Research and Administration in the Department of HSS, IIT Bombay. The use of AI according to the strict demands of academic and professional integrity is the ultimate responsibility of the user/author/writer, whether one is faculty, researcher, student or staff. Human verification of the accuracy of AI content by the user of AI is mandatory in all cases of permissible use.
IIT Bombay's Department of Humanities and Social Sciences AI policy says it specifically addresses AI use for teaching, research, and administration in HSS; users are responsible for academic and professional integrity, and human verification of AI-content accuracy is mandatory for permissible use.
Explicit prior permission from the instructor or supervisor is mandatory for the use of AI, except for the use of basic functions like grammar and spell-check. For the latter, Institute subscribed and recommended (if any) AI platforms must be used. However, use of grammar and spell-checking tools must be acknowledged (see Point No.11).
The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy requires explicit prior permission from the instructor or supervisor for AI use, except for basic grammar and spell-check functions, and says grammar and spell-checking tools must be acknowledged.
Use of AI without human verification is not permissible for any task that involves evaluation or assessment of a student, staff or researcher, including (but not limited to) assessment of student submissions by faculty, of staff by Department functionaries, and screening of applications for admission, recruitment and promotion. AI detection tools (such as Turnitin) cannot be used as the sole criterion for disciplinary action without human verification.
The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy says AI use without human verification is not permissible for tasks involving evaluation or assessment of students, staff, or researchers, and AI detection tools cannot be the sole criterion for disciplinary action without human verification.
Use of AI within permissible limits should be duly acknowledged with proper citation in all types of teaching materials and research outputs. Citation must include: (a) prompts used, (b) AI tools used, and (c) clear demarcation of the content/output generated by or with the aid of AI. Along with specific citations (see point No. 11), all dissertations and research reports submitted for evaluation in the Department of HSS must include a declaration of AI use/non-use by the student/researcher as per IIT Bombay requirement.
The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy says permissible AI use should be acknowledged with proper citation in teaching materials and research outputs, including prompts, AI tools used, and clear demarcation of AI-generated or AI-aided content; HSS dissertations and research reports submitted for evaluation must include an AI use or non-use declaration.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
Security and procurementIndian Institute of Technology Bombay (IITB)
Not mentioned in reviewed sources
Status & scope
Scope stated in the cited claims
Original official evidence
No reviewed evidence is included for this topic. This does not establish that no rule exists.
More policy information
Published source-based additions (7)
These tracker summaries are based on retained official-source material. Present applicability has not been independently confirmed. English summaries and original-language quotations are retained unless a checked Chinese summary is available.
Assessment permission
AI-specific provision
Site summary · original evidence below
Explicit prior instructor/supervisor permission is mandatory for AI except basicgrammar/spelling functions. Those basicfunctions must use Institute-subscribed/recommended platforms if any, and must still be acknowledged; the exception is not an exemption from disclosure.
Scope
Students · department · DepartmentofHumanitiesandSocialSciences(HSS) · HSSonly, no Institute-wide adoptioninference · OriginalPDFTLSfailed; frozenFirecrawlMarkdown; documentendswithtruncateditem16, nofactextractedfromthatitem
6. Explicit prior permission from the instructor or supervisor is mandatory for the use of AI, except for the use of basic functions like grammar and spell-check. For the latter, Institute
subscribed and recommended (if any) AI platforms must be used. However, use of grammar and spell-checking tools must be acknowledged (see Point No.11).
For CS748Spring2026, LLMs must not be used for anywritten course submission, including readingresponses/projectproposal/midreport/finalreport. They may be used for coding/othercourseprojectresearch subject to declareduse, with questions directedtoinstructor. This does not overrideHSSpolicyelsewhere.
Scope
Students · course · CS748 Spring2026 · Specificpastsemester/course; notInstituteorHSS generalpolicy
integrity and academic honesty. Academic violations, as detailed
below, will be dealt with strictly, in accordance with the
institute's procedures
and disciplinary
actions for academic malpractice.
Students may freely collaborate with their peers towards their
research projects, but any assistance received from colleagues must be
properly acknowledged in the corresponding presentations and
reports. Failure to list any source used in responses to reading
assignments will be considered an academic violation.
Students are allowed to verbally discuss the readings with their
peers. However, they must not view, access, or consult any others'
written responses. It is all right to read related papers from the
published literature, blogs, and so on. However, students must
cite every resource consulted or used, as a part of their
response itself. As stated earlier, LLMs must not be consulted in
any manner for preparing any written submission.
Students may use existing code and libraries towards their research
project, and also use LLMs for assistance with coding and research
(for example to discover relevant papers). However, students must
take care to provide appropriate attribution in the relevant
reports. Failure to list any resource used will be considered an
academic violation.
If in any doubt as to what is legitimate collaboration/usage of AI
tools and what is not, students must ask the instructor.
PermittedAI use must be acknowledged with prompts, tools and clearidentification of AIcreated/aided output, with relevantinteractions available if required. All listed HSS dissertations/researchreports need AIuse/nonuse declarations; instructors can also request declarations for courseassignments.
Scope
Students · department · DepartmentofHumanitiesandSocialSciences(HSS) · HSSonly, no Institute-wide adoptioninference · OriginalPDFTLSfailed; frozenFirecrawlMarkdown; documentendswithtruncateditem16, nofactextractedfromthatitem
11. Use of AI within permissible limits should be duly acknowledged with proper citation in all types of teaching materials and research outputs. Citation must include: (a) prompts used, (b) AI tools used, and (c) clear demarcation of the content/output generated by or with the aid of AI. If required, the user should be able to produce relevant interactions with AI for verification. Methods and examples of citation style can be found in the links below:
<u>[https://apastyle.apa.org/blog/cite-generative-ai-references](https://apastyle.apa.org/blog/cite-generative-ai-references)</u>
<u>[https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/qanda/data/faq/topics/Documentation/faq0](https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/qanda/data/faq/topics/Documentation/faq0)</u>
<u>422.html</u>
12. Use of AI without human verification is not permissible for any task that involves evaluation or assessment of a student, staff or researcher, including (but not limited to) assessment of student submissions by faculty, of staff by Department functionaries, and screening of applications for admission, recruitment and promotion.
13. When there is any case of inappropriate AI use by students/research scholars, instructors/supervisors must report the academic malpractice to D-ADAC (Departmental Academic Disciplinary Action Committee) or ADAC ([Institute-level] Academic Disciplinary Action Committee) rather than resolving the issue at a personal or individual level. The malpractice or misconduct will be verified by D-ADAC/ADAC. Disciplinary measures will be decided as per gravity of the malpractice and as per prevalent Institute rules and regulations. [see: <u>https://acad.iitb.ac.in/files/2024-04/punishments</u> <u>201521July.pdf</u>)
14. Along with specific citations (see point No. 11), all dissertations and research reports (such as Annual Progress Seminar [APS], Pre-Synopsis Seminar, MA/MA.Res. project
and other seminar reports) submitted for evaluation in the Department of HSS must include a declaration of AI use/non-use by the student/researcher as per IIT Bombay requirement (see <u>https://acad.iitb.ac.in/files/2024-04/Dissertation17june09-10.pdf</u>; rule No.3.10). Instructors can also ask for such a declaration for course assignments submitted for evaluation.
Institutional/sensitive/nonpublic information must not be entered into AI. AI transcription of humaninterviews/surveydata is not permissible under the stated consent/confidentiality rules, and uploading identifiabledata in violation of DPDPAct is forbidden. These conditions are retained, not broadened into banning allanonymousdata analysis.
Scope
Students · department · DepartmentofHumanitiesandSocialSciences(HSS) · HSSonly, no Institute-wide adoptioninference · OriginalPDFTLSfailed; frozenFirecrawlMarkdown; documentendswithtruncateditem16, nofactextractedfromthatitem
5. In the interest of intellectual property rights, privacy and confidentiality, we must not feed any information into AI platforms that must not be available in the public domain, including institutional and sensitive material.
6. Explicit prior permission from the instructor or supervisor is mandatory for the use of AI, except for the use of basic functions like grammar and spell-check. For the latter, Institute
subscribed and recommended (if any) AI platforms must be used. However, use of grammar and spell-checking tools must be acknowledged (see Point No.11).
7. Students and researchers will be held responsible for the use of AI in any work submitted in the department for evaluation and any violation of academic integrity with respect to the use of AI will be solely their responsibility.
8. It is mandatory to abide by the regulations of the Institute Ethics Committee (IEC) or Review Board (IRB) regarding collection of data from human respondents for maintaining confidentiality, anonymity and consent requirements. Therefore, use of AI for transcription of interviews and survey data is not permissible. Any data containing personally identifiable information must not be uploaded in any platform, including AI platforms, in ways that will violate the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act, 2023 of the Government of India (<u>[https://www.meity.gov.in/documents/act-and-policies](https://www.meity.gov.in/documents/act-and-policies)</u>).
AI without humanverification is impermissible for student/staff/researcher evaluation, including submissionassessment and admissions/recruitment/promotion screening. This is a humanverification requirement, not a prohibition on all AI-assisted evaluation.
Scope
evaluators · department · DepartmentofHumanitiesandSocialSciences(HSS) · HSSonly, no Institute-wide adoptioninference · OriginalPDFTLSfailed; frozenFirecrawlMarkdown; documentendswithtruncateditem16, nofactextractedfromthatitem
12. Use of AI without human verification is not permissible for any task that involves evaluation or assessment of a student, staff or researcher, including (but not limited to) assessment of student submissions by faculty, of staff by Department functionaries, and screening of applications for admission, recruitment and promotion.
Instructors/supervisors must report inappropriate AIuse by students/researchscholars to D-ADAC or InstituteADAC rather than resolve it personally. The committees verify malpractice; discipline depends on gravity and prevailing Institute rules. No tariff is inferred from the linked2015 punishment filename.
Scope
Students · department · DepartmentofHumanitiesandSocialSciences(HSS) · HSSonly, no Institute-wide adoptioninference · OriginalPDFTLSfailed; frozenFirecrawlMarkdown; documentendswithtruncateditem16, nofactextractedfromthatitem
13. When there is any case of inappropriate AI use by students/research scholars, instructors/supervisors must report the academic malpractice to D-ADAC (Departmental Academic Disciplinary Action Committee) or ADAC ([Institute-level] Academic Disciplinary Action Committee) rather than resolving the issue at a personal or individual level. The malpractice or misconduct will be verified by D-ADAC/ADAC. Disciplinary measures will be decided as per gravity of the malpractice and as per prevalent Institute rules and regulations. [see: <u>https://acad.iitb.ac.in/files/2024-04/punishments</u> <u>201521July.pdf</u>)
The HSS policy says tools such as Turnitin cannot be the sole criterion for discipline without humanverification. This is an evidence constraint, not a ban on all detectoruse or evidence that the Institute has activated a particular product.
Scope
Students · department · DepartmentofHumanitiesandSocialSciences(HSS) · HSSonly, no Institute-wide adoptioninference · OriginalPDFTLSfailed; frozenFirecrawlMarkdown; documentendswithtruncateditem16, nofactextractedfromthatitem
Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.
Update records are not available for this page yet.
Reviewed record
Reviewed claims
5 reviewed claims
Academic Integrity 1 reviewed claim
Academic Integrity
The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy requires explicit prior permission from the instructor or supervisor for AI use, except for basic grammar and spell-check functions, and says grammar and spell-checking tools must be acknowledged.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%
Normalized value: HSS policy makes most AI use permission-based and requires acknowledgement for grammar or spell-check tools
Last checked
May 14, 2026
Last changed
May 14, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
Explicit prior permission from the instructor or supervisor is mandatory for the use of AI, except for the use of basic functions like grammar and spell-check. For the latter, Institute subscribed and recommended (if any) AI platforms must be used. However, use of grammar and spell-checking tools must be acknowledged (see Point No.11).
Localized display only
HSS requires prior instructor or supervisor permission for AI use except basic grammar and spell-check tools, which still need acknowledgement.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
e66d054a…
Retrieved
May 14, 2026
Evidence locator
Numbered point 6
Teaching 1 reviewed claim
Teaching
The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy says AI use without human verification is not permissible for tasks involving evaluation or assessment of students, staff, or researchers, and AI detection tools cannot be the sole criterion for disciplinary action without human verification.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%
Normalized value: HSS policy requires human verification for AI-assisted evaluation and bars AI detection tools as the sole disciplinary criterion
Last checked
May 14, 2026
Last changed
May 14, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
Use of AI without human verification is not permissible for any task that involves evaluation or assessment of a student, staff or researcher, including (but not limited to) assessment of student submissions by faculty, of staff by Department functionaries, and screening of applications for admission, recruitment and promotion. AI detection tools (such as Turnitin) cannot be used as the sole criterion for disciplinary action without human verification.
Localized display only
HSS requires human verification for AI-assisted assessment and says AI detection tools cannot be the sole basis for discipline.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
e66d054a…
Retrieved
May 14, 2026
Evidence locator
Numbered points 12 and 15
Privacy 1 reviewed claim
Privacy
The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy says users must not feed non-public, institutional, sensitive, or personally identifiable information into AI platforms, and it says AI transcription of interview and survey data is not permissible when confidentiality, anonymity, consent, or DPDP Act obligations would be affected.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%
Normalized value: HSS policy bars non-public or sensitive uploads to AI platforms and bars AI transcription of interview and survey data in the stated privacy context
Last checked
May 14, 2026
Last changed
May 14, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
In the interest of intellectual property rights, privacy and confidentiality, we must not feed any information into AI platforms that must not be available in the public domain, including institutional and sensitive material. It is mandatory to abide by the regulations of the Institute Ethics Committee (IEC) or Review Board (IRB) regarding collection of data from human respondents for maintaining confidentiality, anonymity and consent requirements. Therefore, use of AI for transcription of interviews and survey data is not permissible. Any data containing personally identifiable information must not be uploaded in any platform, including AI platforms
Localized display only
HSS bars non-public, institutional, sensitive, and personally identifiable information from AI platforms and bars AI transcription of interview or survey data in this research-data context.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
e66d054a…
Retrieved
May 14, 2026
Evidence locator
Numbered points 5 and 8
Research 1 reviewed claim
Research
The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy says permissible AI use should be acknowledged with proper citation in teaching materials and research outputs, including prompts, AI tools used, and clear demarcation of AI-generated or AI-aided content; HSS dissertations and research reports submitted for evaluation must include an AI use or non-use declaration.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%
Normalized value: HSS policy requires citation and demarcation of permissible AI use plus AI use/non-use declarations for HSS dissertations and research reports
Last checked
May 14, 2026
Last changed
May 14, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
Use of AI within permissible limits should be duly acknowledged with proper citation in all types of teaching materials and research outputs. Citation must include: (a) prompts used, (b) AI tools used, and (c) clear demarcation of the content/output generated by or with the aid of AI. Along with specific citations (see point No. 11), all dissertations and research reports submitted for evaluation in the Department of HSS must include a declaration of AI use/non-use by the student/researcher as per IIT Bombay requirement.
Localized display only
HSS requires citation of permissible AI use, including prompts/tools/demarcation, and AI use/non-use declarations for HSS dissertations and research reports.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
e66d054a…
Retrieved
May 14, 2026
Evidence locator
Numbered points 11 and 14
AI tool use 1 reviewed claim
Ai Tool Treatment
IIT Bombay's Department of Humanities and Social Sciences AI policy says it specifically addresses AI use for teaching, research, and administration in HSS; users are responsible for academic and professional integrity, and human verification of AI-content accuracy is mandatory for permissible use.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%
Normalized value: HSS policy scopes AI use to HSS teaching, research and administration and requires user responsibility plus human verification
Last checked
May 14, 2026
Last changed
May 14, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
This policy specifically addresses the use of AI for Teaching, Research and Administration in the Department of HSS, IIT Bombay. The use of AI according to the strict demands of academic and professional integrity is the ultimate responsibility of the user/author/writer, whether one is faculty, researcher, student or staff. Human verification of the accuracy of AI content by the user of AI is mandatory in all cases of permissible use.
Localized display only
HSS IIT Bombay scopes the policy to HSS teaching, research and administration and requires user responsibility plus human verification.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
e66d054a…
Retrieved
May 14, 2026
Evidence locator
Numbered points 1-3
Source record
Official sources
1 source
1 official URLs; 1 source attributions and their captured versions retained.
AI Policy for Teaching, Research and Administration in the Department of HSS, IIT Bombay
www.hss.iitb.ac.in
University official source
hss.iitb.ac.in
Hash and captured version
AI Policy for Teaching, Research and Administration in the Department of HSS, IIT Bombay · 2026-05-14T13:25:41Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IITB) AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 14, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/indian-institute-of-technology-bombay
Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.
Saved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.
Questions students ask
Questions students ask
Can I use AI for my coursework?
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IITB) has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
