Tilføjet
The guidelines state that authors remain fully responsible for verifying the accuracy of AI-assisted work, rigorously fact-checking it and proactively confirming it is free from plagiarism.
Postrevision
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IITD)
Opdateringer af dette websteds gennemgåede post, ikke en bekræftelse af, at universitetet har ændret sin politik.
Trackerens publiceringstidspunkt er ikke en universitetspolitiks ikrafttrædelsesdato.
Hvad denne postopdatering betyder
Involverede poster: 7 (7 tilføjet)
Behandling af AI-værktøjer · Akademisk integritet · 2 emner mere
Akademisk integritet · Involverede poster: 2 (2 tilføjet)
Tilføjet
Course-level plagiarism policies are expected to set differentiated consequences for AI misuse while rewarding honest, responsible engagement with AI tools.
Undervisning · Involverede poster: 2 (2 tilføjet)
Tilføjet
IIT Delhi's committee holds that outright restriction of GenAI tools is neither enforceable nor desirable and recommends that each course instructor develop their own plagiarism policy governing AI use.
Tilføjet
Academic Units are advised to reevaluate assessment methods, prioritizing approaches that AI tools cannot easily replicate.
Privatliv · Involverede poster: 1 (1 tilføjet)
Tilføjet
The guidelines direct all users to exercise caution when entering data into GenAI tools and to screen out sensitive or private details before use.
Behandling af AI-værktøjer · Involverede poster: 2 (2 tilføjet)
Tilføjet
IIT Delhi's GenAI guidelines call for full disclosure of any work or content generated with the assistance of GenAI tools, including noting AI-created images, tables, data visualizations, or significant text sections.
Tilføjet
The committee recommends that IIT Delhi acquire institute-wide licenses for paid GenAI tools such as ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot to ensure equitable access.
Officielle kilder · Kildekontrol
Sammenlignelig gammel og ny tekst er ikke tilgængelig.