Change log

Australian National University (ANU)

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 10, 2026Last changedMay 10, 2026Claims29Sources12

University page Public JSON

Australian National University (ANU) currently has 29 source-backed claim records and 12 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 10, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

11 # Australian National University (ANU) AI policy record
2+source_status: ANU approved six institutional AI principles via Academic Board in June 2023, covering excellence/integrity, research engagement, clear guidance, AI literacy, access/privacy/security, and collaborative policy development.
3+Evidence (en, e1b0ca8c18b2): These six guiding principles on the use of artificial intelligence at the ANU were approved by the Academic Board in June 2023. We will maintain our commitment to excellence and integrity in teaching, learning, assessment and research as the applications of AI in university settings evolve.
4+academic_integrity: Submitting AI-generated content as one's own work constitutes a breach of ANU's academic integrity rules.
5+Evidence (en, c7252a03435c): Inappropriate use of AI is unacceptable and constitutes a breach of academic integrity. If students submit AI-generated content as their own work, they are not submitting original work.
6+privacy: ANU academic staff are not permitted to upload student data or academic work to generative AI platforms.
7+Evidence (en, c7252a03435c): Academic staff are not permitted to upload student data or academic work to GenAI platforms. Therefore, it is not currently possible to generate student feedback or results using student work.
8+privacy: ANU prohibits using AI to collect, use, store, or disclose personal information without express consent from the individual(s).
9+Evidence (en, b0510bd3358a): Do not use AI to collect, use, store and/or disclose personal information, without the express consent of the individual(s).
10+procurement: ANU requires that only university-approved AI solutions/software be used to ensure appropriate data governance, information security, and licensing.
11+Evidence (en, b0510bd3358a): Only utilise AI solution/software approved for use by the University, to ensure appropriate data governance, information security and licencing.
12+privacy: Students retain IP ownership of their assignments at ANU; staff may not upload student work to AI platforms without express student consent.
13+Evidence (en, b0510bd3358a): Students retain Intellectual Property ownership of their assignments, even when they have been submitted for assessment. Therefore, staff are not permitted to upload student work to an AI platform without their express consent.
14+academic_integrity: At ANU, using AI-generated content when not permitted and claiming authorship without acknowledgment constitutes a breach of academic integrity.
15+Evidence (en, 789884f8c5a0): Using AI-generated content when not permitted and claiming authorship without acknowledgment constitutes a breach of academic integrity.
16+privacy: ANU prohibits uploading student work to AI platforms without consent, including for feedback or marking purposes, citing privacy and data security reasons.
17+Evidence (en, 789884f8c5a0): For privacy and data security reasons, uploading student work directly into an AI platform without their consent is not permitted, including for the purpose of feedback or marking.
18+academic_integrity: ANU Law School prohibits using generative AI to draft assessment content; all submitted work must be the student's own independent and original work.
19+Evidence (en, 33a276e33e05): All work submitted for assessment at the ANU Law School must be your own independent and original work. This means that you must not use generative AI to draft your assessment content.
20+academic_integrity: ANU Law School requires students to explicitly declare AI tool usage in the first footnote of submitted work, including tool names, purpose, and extent of use.
21+Evidence (en, 33a276e33e05): In any piece of submitted work where you have used AI tools, you must explicitly declare: The name(s) of the application(s) used, The purpose for their use, The extent and frequency of their use. This declaration should be included in the first footnote.

Claim changes

29 claim records

source_status

ANU approved six institutional AI principles via Academic Board in June 2023, covering excellence/integrity, research engagement, clear guidance, AI literacy, access/privacy/security, and collaborative policy development.